Who are the real conspiracy theorists? ~ By Joseph Farah

Note to Joseph Farah: I loved the column, but there was one slight flaw. When you are called a "conspiracy theorist," it doesn't mean that YOU are part of a conspiracy. What that actually means is that you believe that there was some kind of conspiracy in order to hide Obama's status as a natural born citizen, and be Constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States. As your column states, and as you have mentioned many times in the past, you "remain absolutely agnostic on the question of whether Obama is constitutionally eligible to serve." And that is very much how I feel, and the way Obama and his minions are acting, it does seem to make one feel "certain he's hiding something – deliberately, aggressively, passionately and, I might add, desperately."

I remain absolutely agnostic on the question of whether Obama is constitutionally eligible to serve. I just plain don't know – and I'm honest enough to say it, over and over again.


But, with 35 years of experience in journalism under my belt, I can also say I am 100 percent certain he's hiding something – deliberately, aggressively, passionately and, I might add, desperately.

By Joseph Farah

Posted: March 01, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

There are many in the press today caricaturing me as a "conspiracy theorist" simply because I, like millions of other Americans, insist on actually seeing proof of Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility.

I've never alleged a conspiracy. Obama was given a free pass by an opponent who had his own eligibility issues. Not much of a conspiracy necessary – especially with Obama accountable only to a fawning press and scared-of-their-shadows Republicans.

But "conspiracy theorist" is an easy epithet to hurl.

One good question to ask, the next time you hear someone call me that name, is this: "Who is Joseph Farah conspiring with?"

I'd sure like to know the answer to that question.

I don't see a lot of high-profile or powerful people beating down my door to join "the conspiracy."

All I am doing – and all I have ever done on this issue of constitutional eligibility – is what I would expect every American citizen and especially every member of the press to do: Hold arguably the most powerful politician in the world to accountable to his pledges of "transparency," honesty, the rule of law, his oath of office and the same standard to which his lackluster, unworthy Republican opponent in the 2008 election was held.

Is that too much to ask?

Does that really make me part of the "fringe" in America in 2010?

I make no apologies for pushing this issue. The more I am criticized, the more I realize I am really getting to Obama and his acolytes.

It's hardly a "conspiracy theory" to state the obvious: Obama has not proven he is constitutionally eligible. In fact, he has made no effort to do so. All he does is mau-mau about not questioning his citizenship.

If he can't stand being questioned, he has no business being in public office.

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!