Monday, December 21, 2015

Cruz vs. Trump: Not even a contest ~ By Star Parker

Star Parker
Star Parker: It takes a leader that's 'a little bit of a maniac' to turn things around

I am afraid that in this rare time, I may have to contradict Star's title to this column, which is "Cruz vs. Trump: Not even a contest." You see, there is just a little hint of misinformation, at least for some that haven't paid enough attention. There are some... no, wait, that should be MANY Republicans that believe there is no contest: Donald Trump is their guy! No contest.

However, Star isn't writing this as a Trump supporter, but as somebody that sees Ted Cruz as a true contender for that Republican Party nomination.  Star explains why SHE feels that Cruz would be a much better President, with his values still intact, and thus making him a better leader, by example, to turn around the decline of America. Yes, her case is about values, and I can not deny that fact. Here is how Star put it:
Now, with our economy growing well below historic average, with our national debt equal to the size of our entire economy, with Medicare and Social Security insolvent to the tune, by some measures, of $100 trillion, with the American family in shambles and almost half our babies being born to unwed mothers, you have to be on another planet, or a Democrat, not to know America is in decline.

But it takes a leader that’s “a little bit of a maniac” to take on turning this big ship around. It takes someone who cares more about country than about self to stand and fight against an entrenched status quo.

Ted Cruz has stood courageously alone since his first day in the Senate, shining light on what is wrong: about growing debt, about Obamacare, about taxpayer funds going to Planned Parenthood, about immigration. Donald Trump today is reaping the harvest of public awareness Ted Cruz has been sowing for years. Trump should be thanking Ted Cruz.
Please understand that I am not posting this column by Star Parker as an endorsement for Ted Cruz, nor am I predicting that Cruz will be the Republican nominee. I'm just the messenger, telling you what a columnist and author, that happens to be a black female, thinks about the top contenders for the 2016 GOP nomination.

What I will say is that I believe the Republican nomination is now between Ted Cruz and Donald Trump. As for me, I'm weighing all the information about both candidates, the good and the bad. I pay attention to what the MSM says about them, because the Democrat rhetoric will echo the leftist media in the general election next Fall. Just to give the liberal media and DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wassername something to really worry about, maybe the solution is to have Trump and Cruz on the ticket. Hillary wouldn't have a prayer! Just sayin'...

*    *    *    *

Cruz vs. Trump: Not even a contest

New polling shows Ted Cruz picking up major steam and looking very serious in challenging Donald Trump's leadership in the Republican presidential candidate field. A Bloomberg News/Des Moines Register poll shows Cruz now leading in Iowa. A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal national poll shows Cruz jumping up 12 points from 10 percent in late October.…

Sunday, December 13, 2015

Where is the 3rd San Bernardino shooter? ~ By Pamela Geller

Pamela Geller
Pamela Geller recalls early reports of '3 white men in military fatigues'

I was watching Fox News, with the lead anchor Shep Smith, as the "very fluid" situation continued to play out. And I DO remember, vividly, that the talk was about three suspects until a few hours after the two suspects were found in their dark SUV - a Ford, not a Chevy or GM as one of the witnesses seemed to be sure of - the TWO ALLEGED terrorists who were shot dead, and there continued to be talk of a third suspect running down the street.

Scott Pelley of CBS Evening News interviewed one eyewitness, Sara Abdelmageed. She said: “I heard shots fired and it was from – you know – an automatic weapon. … As we looked out the window, a second set of shots goes off … and we saw a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on. They were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors to building three, one of them started to shoot into the room.”

Abdelmageed added that she "couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on – black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side, long sleeve shirt, gloves, huge assault rifle six magazines I just saw three dressed exactly the same."
While this story raises concerns, I still have issues with one of the supposed "witnesses". She said, "couldn't see a face" and "long sleeve shirt, gloves" ... And she knew exactly how many clips they were carrying... So, how could this witness, Sara Abdelmageed, have known they were "white men"? Was she able to see the color of their eyes? I want to re-examine this witness. You see, there are problems with some of these witness' statements. But on the other side of the coin, there tends to be a few problems with the police procedures that afternoon and in the following days. As Pamela points out, it seemed very odd that the suspects' apartment was allowed to be contaminated soon after the FBI left the crime scene.

Alright, then, supposing the latest conspiracy theory is true and the now deceased suspects were NOT the mass killers, what would be the reason for such an operation? Can there be a "greater good" that could have been accomplished? There are two extremely important questions that I have no answers for: Who and Why. There is no way that you will know "Why?" without knowing "Who?" and vice versa. Neither one of those questions can be answered by itself.

I'm sure there will be plenty of theories. It will be discussed that the New World Order, lead by the Illuminati, had it done in order to give an excuse for Obama to declare a ban on guns by Executive Order, and to divide the Republican voters on the immigration of Muslim refugees. As far as I'm concerned, the very same outcome could be achieved by promoting a conspiracy that really didn't happen. Lies will always have more bad affects than Truth. And now, we just don't know which is which; I am so confused! Just sayin'...

*    *    *    *

Where is the 3rd San Bernardino shooter?

Like many shocked and horrified Americans, I watched the events of the San Bernardino jihad massacre unfolding in real time. Several eyewitnesses were certain: There were, from the very first, three shooters. Police scanner broadcasts and news reports all said the same thing. Scott Pelley of CBS Evening News interviewed one eyewitness, Sara Abdelmageed. She said:…

VIDEO: Why the major surge in guns and ammo sales?

Firearms and ammunition sales are obviously surging. In this video, we'll show you the Fox & Friends First story about...

Posted by Johnny2k's America on Saturday, December 12, 2015

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!
are the MOB
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

Friday, December 11, 2015

VIDEO: Citizens schooling local govt. officials on 2nd Amendment

The citizens of North Liberty, Iowa, school the Mayor and City Council on Second Amendment gun rights. Citizens 1, City...

Posted by Johnny2k's America on Wednesday, December 9, 2015

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!
are the MOB
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

Monday, December 07, 2015

The theocracy of climate change ~ By Carl Jackson

Carl Jackson sees Obama 'forcing his redistributionist values on Americans'

Carl Jackson
When minor “setbacks” like the ISIS attack in Paris, France, or the Islamic terrorist attack in San Bernardino occur, he has no problem minimizing their relevancy. Not just because they don’t fit his political narrative, but because they don’t promulgate his moral one – that America is an immoral nation and the cause of much suffering worldwide.

In other words, in President Obama’s eyes, ISIS is a byproduct of American dominance around the world. It doesn’t matter to him whether or not “man-made” climate change is real; what matters to him is that it can be exploited to right his perceived wrong of America stealing the world’s resources. To Obama, addressing climate change is rectifying a greater evil – even greater than ISIS. That’s why it should come as no surprise to us that Obama spoke just a few miles from the site of the Nov. 13 terrorist attack in the French capital and called for urgent action against a challenge he suggested was greater even than the scourge of terrorism.
Don't worry. If you've had a thing for man-made global warming or climate change, we'll forgive you. It had to be difficult to resist the indoctrination you may have received since you were in preschool, courtesy of the leftists that took over all of the public institutions. Oh, and Hollywood? They made sure that most entertainment was produced with the narrative that man-cause climate change because of CO2 was a generally accepted fact.

But then, we had the politicians jumping into the game, which at one time seemed to span over the entire political spectrum. Well, that is until many on the Right were finally able to discern the fraud of global warming caused by man for what it was. Unfortunately, some who claimed to be Conservative gave themselves away, when they continued to be supportive of the big lie about human activity (in capitalist nations) leading to the ultimate destruction of this planet we call Earth.

When I checked out Carl Jackson's Facebook page, I found a link to a very interesting video that explains the truth about that "terrible threat" of "lethal" CO2 gas that is the basis of the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) delusional garbage... and which is actually essential for life on this planet to continue to exist.  See the video below:

There is one important point that needs your attention in Carl's column. It will really help you make sense out of the stupid things that Obama said in Paris, about terrorists being poor downtrodden victims (because of industrial CO2 emissions, of course) of the imperial capitalist West. I think he also injected that belief into his speech from the Oval Office Sunday night; he blamed that 2nd Amendment thing, rather than the radical Islamic terrorists and their goal of global supremacy. It's just his agenda. When you understand that, everything makes sense. Just sayin'...

*    *    *    *

The theocracy of climate change

Leftists count on man-made law to feel moral. Conservatives count on the God that created man to become moral. Webster's dictionary defines a theocracy as a government by officials regarded as divinely inspired. In a theocracy, the individual doesn't have a say in who will run his country or what laws shall be passed. In America…

Sunday, December 06, 2015

Trump followers turn nasty on me ~ By Michael Brown

Dr. Michael Brown
Michael Brown shares vitriolic responses to his opinion of candidate

The Republican Caucus here in Iowa is in less than two months. In my vigilant pursuit of the wisdom to make the right choice about which candidate I will support, I came across this column by Dr. Michael Brown. It really struck me that my thoughts were reflected so well in the following excerpt:
As I’ve said repeatedly, there’s much to like about Donald Trump, and it appears that there are certain things he could do well as a president. And under no circumstances could I vote for any of the current Democratic candidates.

But when I see the irrational response of so many of his supporters, coupled with their demonizing of those who oppose him (along with, often, the demonizing of the other candidates), this only heightens my concerns.

I will certainly pray for Donald Trump and for God’s best for America. At the same time, I will raise concerns as I see them, since my goal is to see our nation blessed.
If you actually read the whole column, which would be a wise thing to do, you'll read about the nasty comments from the Trump followers that Dr. Michael Brown received. As I'm finding out, many of my friends and associates are favoring Donald Trump. I have not experienced any vitriol due to my lack of fealty to the Trump cause.  The truth is, I have not decided on who I will support in the Iowa Caucus.  I will avoid having the Trump followers turning nasty on me, because they're going to want my vote and they know they better behave and schmooze me for their cause.  Just sayin'...

*    *    *    *

Trump followers turn nasty on me
I knew that there would be a strong backlash when I raised concerns about evangelical Christians supporting Donald Trump as the Republican presidential candidate. (I did this by video and column.) But it is the nature of the attacks that concerns me, since it appears that for some staunch Trump supporters, you cannot be a strong…

Thursday, December 03, 2015

Global non-warming will be death of socialism ~ By Lord Christopher Monckton

Lord Monckton
Lord Monckton reveals end result of 'mad climate scare'

So, it is one thing if the Left disparages the global warming deniers, but it is a completely different issue when it comes to what many on the Left would like to do to any of us that question the idea that this world will be doomed because of man-caused global warming:
Let me give you a single, telling statistic. In a recent opinion poll, 27 percent of "Democrats" said they thought that anyone who questioned the party line on climate change should be arrested, charged, detained, interrogated, tried, convicted and imprisoned.

For the sake of argument, let us imagine that the "Democrats" are right and that, unless the West commits economic hara-kiri in the name of saving the planet for socialism, we are all doomed. Let us pretend that the grim profiteer of doom, Lord Stern, was right to assert that unless we shut down the West there is a 1-in-10 chance that the world will come to an end by 2100.

Even if the world really did face Thermageddon within this century, that fact would not in any way justify the “Democrats” in putting questioners of their beliefs into prison.
For now, to the Left's dismay, not only are we able to say what we think about anthropogenic climate change, but the nonconformists like Lord Monckton and people like myself still have the freedom to show the climate change hysteria or what it is: It is backed by both the Socialists and globalists. For now, the deniers only have to face the normal negative feedback from the cyber-bullies, and deal with the possibility of being blackballed in our careers. At this time, we still don't have to face jail time for our writing or speaking about our doubts regarding man-caused climate change.

But, that can change.  In fact, the current President did his best to transform America.  The change, as illustrated and emphasized in the video below, was intended to warm up Americans to accept Socialism.

I am sure hoping that the people who see this post will incite freedom-loving patriots to spread this story around.  There is another election coming in less than one year.  The Democrats will nominate a Socialist, whether it be Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders.  We don't have to allow one of them to occupy the White House.  However, as Lord Monckton mentions in this column, the American people would find out about the evils of Socialism, maybe in one generation.  Unfortunately, it may not take another election, as there is already a Socialist in the Oval Room.  And an election in November 2016 may not even happen.  Just sayin'...

The Socialist
So, I was looking through the videos in my archive, and I came across this one from 2012... It kind of goes along with the Democrat Debate the other night.... and the fact that Democrat=Socialism these days, more than ever! It wasn't exactly the change I was looking for!
Posted by Johnny2k's America on Thursday, October 15, 2015


*    *    *    *

Global non-warming will be death of socialism

The Forces of Darkness are gathering in Paris as I write. My own bags are packed, for the army of light and truth will be there, too, though in far smaller numbers than the enemy. I had hoped – we had all hoped – that with the fall of the Berlin Wall, the future of freedom…

Tuesday, December 01, 2015

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever ~ By Christopher Booker

New data shows that the “vanishing” of polar ice is not the result of runaway global warming
[Paul] Homewood's interest in the Arctic is partly because the "vanishing" of its polar ice (and the polar bears) has become such a poster-child for those trying to persuade us that we are threatened by runaway warming. But he chose that particular stretch of the Arctic because it is where ice is affected by warmer water brought in by cyclical shifts in a major Atlantic current – this last peaked at just the time 75 years ago when Arctic ice retreated even further than it has done recently. The ice-melt is not caused by rising global temperatures at all.
The days of being a "climate change denier," resulting in ostracization, are about over. It is becoming more difficult for the leftist global warming enthusiasts to pressure their colleagues by black-balling them from employment in various industries, academic institutions, and government agencies.

The problem for Al Gore and his sycophants is that, at least for now, there is plenty of information out in the cyber-sphere where it is shown that there is plenty of reason to question the "consensus" of the so-called scientific experts. With evidence that "scientific" data was skewed in order to make their case, the AGW (antropogenic global warming) theory is no longer beyond reasonable doubt.

It's getting extremely difficult to believe that man has the ability to so drastically alter climate. And it is disturbing that so many people don't yet understand, or realize, or believe, that the climate-change-caused-by-man theory is backed by globalists and socialists (Marxists). Those are the last people that we would want to be controlling energy! Just sayin'...


*    *    *    *

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever
By Christopher Homewood

Posted 10:15PM GMT 07 Feb 2015

From The Telegraph (UK)

The “vanishing” of polar ice (and the polar bears) has become a poster-child for warmists. Photo: ALAMY
When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Not a lot of people know that blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record.

~~~ READ MORE at The Telegraph (UK) ~~~

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!
are the MOB
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *