Glenn Beck's departure from Fox News, Part 2 ~ By Robert Ringer

Somebody would like Glenn Beck to be silent...

When I posted Part 1 of Robert Ringer's column about Glenn Beck yesterday, I had no idea that there would be two great surprises waiting for me. First, I had the largest number of page views on this blog for a single day, and of course, mostly for Robert Ringer's column. Second, I had assumed that Ringer would come out with Part 2 next week. Surprise! Here it is already! Hooo-RAH!

When I wrote my introduction yesterday for Part 1, I said the following:

Though I am greatly looking forward to the next part of Robert's series about Glenn, I am afraid I have thought of some possibilities already why he could be departing Fox News. It could be very ugly. I'm always afraid - very afraid - that somebody may not want Glenn to be talking about certain crimes and misdemeanors... And Glenn's current Crime Inc and Global Governance series may be more than some people want the "sheeple" to know. Please join me in praying for Glenn, his family, and his staff, for their safety.

As you read this installment Robert's column about Beck, you will see that I had hit at least one of his thoughts on the head. And again, please keep Glenn, his family and his staff in your prayers.

And before you get started reading this outstanding Robert Ringer piece, I will leave you with another video segment from the Glenn Beck show, this time from May 11, 2010. This video will also show you, as did the one I included yesterday, why Glenn is such a danger to the Obama agenda:

May 11, 2010 - Glenn Beck: Something's not right (May 11, 2010) Part 3 of 3

Video provided by TheREALjohnny2k

Do you see now why what Ringer writes - especially today - is so ominous? But yet, Robert has one other point to make, too, which may surprise you the most. Just sayin'...

Much like the Founding Fathers, I believe Beck has committed himself to using his fame, his fortune and his enormous talents to help defeat the poisonous progressive movement that is fundamentally transforming the United States into a destitute socialist nation.

So, the $64 question is: Will Glenn Beck ultimately conclude that he has no choice but to run for president?

And the $128 question is: Would enough Americans be willing to open their minds to the truths he would expose to elect him president?

By Robert Ringer

Posted: May 28, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

In Part 1 of this article, I expressed my concern that Glenn Beck might not be around for the long term at Fox News. As I watch him strip BHO and other members of Crime Inc. down to their dirty underwear every day at 5 p.m., I ponder what the Obamaviks will do to try to stop him from destroying their efforts to transform the U.S. into a collectivist paradise.

In that regard, I can envision four possibilities for Beck's exit:

Assassination. On more than one occasion, Beck has alluded to cement boots and his ending up at the bottom of the East River. He has also assured his audience that he has no inclination to jump off a tall building, and if something like that would ever happen to him, it would not be accidental.

Even more ominous is that Beck continually tells his audience that this isn't about him, that each and every one of them must stand up and carry on the fight. When he says this, it sparks memories of Martin Luther King Jr.'s famous words at a Memphis rally the night before he was murdered: "I may not get there with you, but I want you to know tonight that we as a people will get to the promised land."

Anyone reasonably knowledgeable about political history knows that those on the far left unabashedly believe that their morally superior objectives justify the use of violence. The problem they have with Beck is that using violence to eliminate him is problematic, given that he has already warned the public to be on the lookout for his untimely demise.

So, let's assume – and hope – that no harm befalls Glenn Beck. What else, then, might cause him to leave Fox?

Roger Ailes retires or passes on. Roger Ailes has almost single-handedly propped up the free press in this country, being so good at his job that Fox News has been able to render its left-wing media competition almost irrelevant. When Ailes, who recently turned 70, leaves Fox, there is no assurance that Rupert Murdoch will pick a replacement with equally strong conservative beliefs.

If Roger Ailes is replaced by a "moderate," the new president of Fox would undoubtedly either terminate Beck or place restrictions on what he could and could not say. And if the latter occurred, you can be sure Beck would depart Fox – with his honor intact, as promised.

Rupert Murdoch passes on. Rupert Murdoch is still going strong, but the reality is that he's 79 years old. And Murdoch's children are liberals who have long complained that Fox News is too conservative. With Murdoch gone, there would surely be a major shakeup, and both Roger Ailes and Glenn Beck would quickly be out the door.

The Godfather option. Barack Obama knows that time is against him. With liberal Democrats dropping like flies in primaries and special elections, he can't afford to wait too long for Roger Ailes to retire or Rupert Murdoch to die.

Solution? Just send "the boys" over to have a little chat with Murdoch and make him "an offer he can't refuse." In keeping with diversity czar Mark Lloyd's stated objective to force "some people to step down to make room for others," the offer might be as straightforward as: If you get rid of Glenn Beck, Fox News can stay on the air. Otherwise …

Kind of the Obamafia's version of putting a bloody horse's head in someone's bed to improve his perception of reality.

So where does Beck go if he departs Fox News? On at last one occasion, he said that even if the bad guys succeed in forcing him off radio and television, he will come back with a louder voice and larger platform than ever. I found that to be a tantalizing statement, one that caused me to speculate on what such a platform might be.

Of course, the biggest platform of all would be president of the United States. Beck says he would never run for president, because he wouldn't want to risk losing his soul, the implication being that a person can't run for president and keep his honor intact.

I thought about this recently when Beck did an in-depth show on George Washington. He emphasized that what made Washington unique was that he did not want to be president. He accepted the office only out of a sense of duty, and refused to stay in office longer than two terms.

I believe Beck sees himself in much the same way. I think he feels a sense of duty to do whatever he can to save America. He knows George Washington did not want to be president, and says that "Americans are looking for someone like George Washington."

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Profits derived from your purchases
will help me to attend tea party rallies,
(especially the one in Las Vegas, on July 15-17)!

Glenn Beck's departure from Fox News, Part 1 ~ By Robert Ringer

Glenn Beck

As always, I haven't used the complete, full text of the column in this post. So, I implore you to read the full column by Robert Ringer.

Being that I have been a follower of Glenn Beck on his radio show for at least four years, and started watching him on TV since shortly before he departed CNN, there wasn't anything in this column I wasn't already well aware of or didn't agree with. However, for you that haven't been following Beck as much or at all, you may not be aware that there is something very special about Glenn. And Robert hits it right on the nose. It is in the part that I didn't copy and paste to this post. And that is why you need to read this and then go read the full column!

I pray for Glenn every day, because I know what he has been doing both on the radio and his show on Fox News. Though I am greatly looking forward to the next part of Robert's series about Glenn, I am afraid I have thought of some possibilities already why he could be departing Fox News. It could be very ugly. I'm always afraid - very afraid - that somebody may not want Glenn to be talking about certain crimes and misdemeanors... And Glenn's current Crime Inc and Global Governance series may be more than some people want the "sheeple" to know. Please join me in praying for Glenn, his family, and his staff, for their safety. Just sayin'...

Video provided by TheREALjohnny2k

Not long ago, Beck came right out and said, "I'm going out swinging." That statement carried with it some very strong implications. Clearly, something has to give.

My best guess? I hope I'm wrong, but I have long had the feeling that Glenn Beck will be leaving Fox News other than through old-age retirement.


How might his departure come about? The way I see it, there are four possible avenues of exit, which I will discuss in detail tomorrow in Part 2 of this column.

By Robert Ringer

Posted: May 26, 2010 ~ 10:01 pm Eastern

© 2010

On rare occasions, a unique figure bursts onto the national stage and has a dramatic impact on politics, culture, or both. Glenn Beck is one of those figures. He is surely the biggest, fastest, most controversial star in the political commentary business in my lifetime.

Beck is a real-life version of Howard Beale, the fictional television commentator in the 1976 film classic "Network." Beale whipped his cultish TV audience into a frenzy, exhorting them to stick their heads out the window and chant, "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!"

Much to the chagrin of the oligarchy in Washington, however, Glenn Beck is not a fictional character. He's real, and he has succeeded in enlightening his audience far beyond Beale's simple rants about the unfairness of life. Beck is much more knowledgeable, much more factual, much more rational and much more focused on the key issue: America's loss of liberty.

I find it more than just a bit ironic that ultra-liberal CNN Headline News gave Beck his first forum on television. There, he created a huge stir with his "rodeo-clown" antics and his willingness to talk openly about his drug- and alcohol-addicted past. But as he increasingly added his political views to the mix, people started asking, "Why isn't this guy on Fox News?"

Of course, Roger Ailes was closely observing Beck all along, and, in January 2009, he brought him to Fox and fit him into the 5 p.m. time slot. While Beck had been moving more and more toward political commentary at CNN Headline News, from the moment he came to Fox his transition to near-total politics was swift.

Combining his incredible talents with the work of his equally incredible research staff, Beck became a household name seemingly overnight. In truth, of course, he had been in media for 30 years, but he had never before had a forum like Fox News.

Beck's show is so good that I'm convinced if a person doesn't watch it on a regular basis, it's almost impossible for him to understand the true causes of the moral and economic collapse of the United States – or even that it is collapsing – because no one else on TV covers most of the stories he dissects in impeccable detail. His modus operandi has been to expose the bad guys through their own words by playing audio and video of them shooting off their mouths and by quoting their writings.

For quite some time now, I have believed that Beck has become so good at exposing the truth, so well-respected and so powerful that the Forces of Darkness in the White House and Congress view him as a major threat to their aspirations to eliminate the Constitution, the rule of law and individual sovereignty in the United States. (In fact, they now refer to him as "the Beck problem.")

But, as I have written in the past, the Obamafia is in a no-win situation with Beck. If its leaders ignore him, he will continue to disrobe Chairman Obama and his malevolent progressive pals through their own spoken and written words.

On the other hand, as they have already discovered, the more they try to discredit Beck, the more attention they draw to him – and the more people will learn about the details of how they plan to fundamentally transform America. Worse, their childish mudslinging is no match for Beck's 60 minutes of hard-core truth five days a week (not to mention his three-hour daily radio show).

So Beck keeps raising the ante, and there is no question in my mind that the oligarchy in Washington sees him as a major obstacle between where they are today and their ultimate goal: a firmly entrenched, all-powerful federal government that controls every aspect of people's lives.

Listening to Beck this past year has convinced me that he senses he has been chosen by a Higher Power to lead the charge against the evildoers in government. If so, it's not the first time God has surprised the world with his choice of a messenger.

You MUST READ the FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com!

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Profits derived from your purchases
will help me to attend tea party rallies,
(especially the one in Las Vegas, on July 15-17)!

Coffee party: Either ignoramuses or Marxists ~ By Robert Ringer

When you read this column, you will quickly understand that the "coffee-party" is the TRUE "astroturf" movement, and is in no way any kind of grassroots group. Of course, Robert Ringer doesn't actually use that word, but being that "astroturf" was something that Nancy Pelosi would say to ridicule the TEA Party movement, I guess we can't blame him.

My advice to the tea-party people is to ignore the coffee-party phonies. They are not a real movement, thus they will always lack the one thing the tea-party people have in abundance: passion. The tea-party movement is a true grass-roots movement whose only agenda is to remove the criminal class in Washington and work to elect some semi-honest politicians to office – then hold them accountable for defending the Constitution of the United States.

Isn't it interesting that the coffee party does not so much as mention the Constitution in its mission statement? That's because the chief purpose of the Constitution is to put restraints on government.

By Robert Ringer

Posted: May 14, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

Not long ago, I caught the tail end of a television interview with Obama supporter Annabel Park, founder of the Coffee Party USA. What little I heard of the interview sounded like it was the progressives' answer to the tea-party movement. The party's mission statement, as posted on its website, is as follows:

The Coffee Party Movement gives voice to Americans who want to see cooperation in government. We recognize that the federal government is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will, and that we must participate in the democratic process in order to address the challenges that we face as Americans. As voters and grass-roots volunteers, we will support leaders who work toward positive solutions, and hold accountable those who obstruct them.

The above is clearly a not-so-subtle attack on the tea-party people. While it is vague, it's easy to spot its progressive tone when you break it down into its component parts.

• "The Coffee Party Movement gives voice to Americans who want to see cooperation in government."

This is code for "conservatives and libertarians should go along with Obama's socialist agenda." Personally, I don't want to see "cooperation" in Washington. Like most Americans, I want to see government gridlock. Giving these scoundrels our money is one thing; having them use it to impose more laws on us is another.

• "We recognize that the federal government is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will, and that we must participate in the democratic process in order to address the challenges that we face as Americans."

Sorry, coffee people, but I'm not buying it. Government is the enemy of the people, because it violates the natural rights of its citizens. The Founding Fathers repeatedly warned us to distrust government. It is the very attitude of the coffee-party people that has brought the U.S. to the verge of collapse and dictatorship.

Regarding the expression of our "collective will," as with the "common good," there is no such thing. The government is an expression of a criminal class that increasingly violates our liberty. With some notable exceptions, politicians lie, steal, cheat and deceive the public while enriching themselves at our expense.

As to "participating in the democratic process," the tea-party people have been doing just that, and the result has been nonstop verbal abuse from the president, progressives in Congress and, above all, the cheerleading media. Those in power are most decidedly against the democratic process, the essence of which is public demonstration and the expression of discontent with those in power.

• "As voters and grass-roots volunteers, we will support leaders who work toward positive solutions, and hold accountable those who obstruct them."

Hmm … I just can't imagine which leaders they might be referring to when they allude to "work toward positive solutions." (Hint: government's recent takeover of health care.)

As to "holding accountable those who obstruct them," didn't one of those "leaders who work toward positive solutions" once yell out to members of the opposing party, "If you misrepresent what's in the plan, we will call you out." Gosh, what a coincidence. Epithets such as "hold you accountable" and "call you out" are nothing more than threats from those who don't like to hear opposing opinions.

In her television interview, Annabel Park said that she wants to see cooperation in government to "get things done for the common good." Once someone uses an abstract phrase such as "the common good," it automatically puts them in one of two categories: ignoramus or Marxist.

There is no such thing as the common good, because what is good for me may be bad for you, and vice versa. Civilized people work to improve their own well-being, and they do so while respecting the rights of others to do the same.

I don't know whether BHO's henchmen are behind the coffee "movement" or not, but one thing is certain: The progressive power holders will give it their full support, as will their media pawns (ABC, CBS, NBC, the New York Times, etc.).

The bottom line to the coffee party's mission statement is this: Paint the tea-party people to be terrorists, fascists, racists, obstructionists … all the things BHO and his surrogates having been trying, unsuccessfully, to do for the past year.

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Profits derived from your purchases
will help me to attend tea party rallies!

When Republicans were Nazis ~ By Jack Cashill

Commentary from WorldNetDaily

By Jack Cashill Posted: November 26, 2009 ~ 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 I had the occasion this past week to meet with former Attorney General John Ashcroft. I asked him how he felt when Democrats express outrage about accusations of fascism against the Obama administration. Ashcroft smiled. He knows a little something about such accusations. Five years ago I wrote about the subject on these pages, and I thought it worth a revisit. Back then, one progressive friend after another alerted me to a rather scary development: U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft had become a Nazi – "another Hitler" as one fretfully described our former Missouri governor and senator. This all came as news to me. I had met Ashcroft a few times, and he had exhibited no signs of latent Nazism: no heel-clicking or arm-thrusting, no anti-Semitic slurs or "sieg heils," no quiet yearnings for the Fatherland. I wondered, too, how a man of such presumed extremes could manage to win five statewide races in America's most politically indicative state. Still, I could not just dismiss those alarums. At least three of my friendly Cassandras were prominent Missourians. Perhaps they knew something I did not. To test their suspicions, I did a quick online search and got a jolt of confirmation. Some 18,400 Web postings linked "Ashcroft" and "Nazi," at least two-thirds of which accused Ashcroft of being a Nazi. One site served as an unofficial Ashcroft songbook. It posted the lyrics of more than 70 songs, all of which alerted the innocent to the suspected reign of terror at Justice. Indeed, it must have taken an act of deep courage to pen a song like "The Obnoxious Right Wing Nazi Pig Dog From Missouri" (sung to tune of "Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy") knowing that the aforementioned "pig dog" was creating "Dachaus" for his political opponents. I could not write off these suspicions as mere Internet blather. On one even more damning site, America's erstwhile "most trusted man," the late Walter Cronkite, denounced Ashcroft as the "Torquemada of American law." Torquemada was the proto-fascist responsible, according to Cronkite, for the unholy methods of the Spanish Inquisition, "including torture and the burning of heretics – Muslims in particular." Egads! No wonder my friends were upset. As I learned in my investigation, progressives do not upset easily. During World War I, the Espionage and Sedition Acts allowed Woodrow Wilson's progressive administration to prosecute those reckless enough to voice anti-war sentiments. Socialist presidential candidate Eugene Debs spent 10 years in prison as a result. He was one of 2,000 so prosecuted. During World War II, the always progressive FDR interned – by executive order – 120,000 ethnic Japanese with the full-throated support of the Supreme Court. The Clinton years witnessed a renewal of the left's selective affection for civil rights. When, for instance, Ashcroft's predecessor as attorney general, Janet Reno, launched a tank assault on a religious community outside of Waco, killing 80 people, more than half of them minorities, 20 of them children, my friends kept silent. [CLICK HERE TO READ MORE]

White House stonewalls on 'radical' adviser

From WorldNetDaily

Won't explain how admitted 'rowdy communist' became 'green jobs czar' Posted: August 27, 2009 ~ 12:15 am Eastern By Aaron Klein © 2009 WorldNetDaily JERUSALEM – More than five months after the Obama administration announced the hiring of its "green jobs czar," Van Jones, the White House has refused to explain whether it knew of Jones admitted black nationalist and radical communist history and just who hired the adviser. Also questions continue to fester about how Jones, who has an arrest history, passed security clearances for his White House position. Cliff Kincaid, an editor at Accuracy in Media, attempted to answer some of these questions when he used the Freedom of Information Act in April to request immediate access to all documents relating to the appointment of Jones to the White House Council on Environmental Quality, where he serves as special adviser for green jobs, enterprise and innovation. The council, which hired Jones, replied that it "searched its records system and found none responsive" for Kincaid's request. The council recommended more information be sought at the White House Press Office, which did not respond to Kincaid's requests about how Jones was hired. [READ ENTIRE STORY]

The Silencing of the Sheeple ~ By John Kubicek

By John Kubicek I came up with the idea for this writing when I saw the following segment on Fox & Friends:

We all know that eventually, as we age, we come down with the CRS (Can't Remember Stuff) disease, but I was able to remember when those that protested the War In Iraq complained about being called unpatriotic because they disagreed with the war effort, especially in Iraq. That was back in the days when people still remembered the horrors of 9/11, and of course, anyone that complained about the course of action was just so unpatriotic. They were un-American. They were demonized. And the war protesters made a valid point that it was their right to speak out - even if they were part of the Code Pink minions. But, isn't it weird that those same people, those who claimed their rights to speak up were being taken away, seem to be the same people that are now calling the Town Hall dissenters "mobs," and Tea Party participants "teabaggers?" The same mainstream media that criticized the Bush administration for calling those that dissented against the War on Terror as being unpatriotic, are now calling people that voice their dissent on health care reform (known as ObamaCare), "un-American."[READ COMPLETE COLUMN]

Red Alert! Infowars under direct attack by Obama Brownshirts

http://www.infowars.com/red-alert-infowars-under-direct-attack-by-obama-brownshirts/

Alex Jones
Infowars
August 8, 2009

There can longer be any doubt, the White House and their army of cult followers are publicly censoring the news and restricting free speech.

People in opposition to Obama’s policies are now being beaten up in the streets everywhere and the White House has unleashed tattle tale squads to flag and report dissenters. We have now been directly censored. Even we are shocked.

It’s just like what Obama did with Odinga in Kenya– my God, these people are for real.

Again, we are under attack right now. Within the next hour, we’ll have a video and story up, so watch this space.

The enemy is moving against everyone, not just us.

It’s like 1918 in Russia, or the takeover in China by Mao or the rise of Hitler.

I’m working feverishly with my team. We’ll have details for you within the next 2 hours. Please stand by to get this info out to everyone you know.

This is a Red alert.

I told everyone on Friday the country is on the edge of Revolution. The bankers know this; they knew there’d be resistance to their corporate takeover of the United States, so they are trying to restrict dissent and take over public meetings, because their illusion is in trouble.

Tyrannts slowly get you to accept their abuse, until all of a sudden you wake up and realize that you’re under the oppression seen in Germany in 1935.

This is a rush report; more to follow soon.

[This short report has been re-published in full from InfoWars.com. Be sure to stand by for any further reports.]

UPDATE: As mentioned above, there was more to follow. See "Obama Speech Police Shutdown Top You Tube Videos."

Memo to CNN President Jon Klein ~ By Joseph Farah

By Joseph Farah Posted: August 08, 2009 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 It has been more than a week now since you wrote a memo to your entire editorial team explaining that the Obama birth certificate story was "dead" because Hawaii had destroyed all original, long-form, hospital-generated documents. In fact, it has been a week since the state of Hawaii repudiated your baseless assertion. Isn't it time to apologize for your error and to Lou Dobbs for attempting to intimidate him for covering the story? And since your basis for not covering the story has been blown to smithereens, isn't it time for you to issue a new edict to your news team to get back on the story? What am I missing? Perhaps you were just looking for an excuse not to cover the story in the first place? Your network is going to be left in the dust on one of the biggest stories in the history of the country. But I don't suppose that matters to you. My guess is that you are one of those media executives who puts politics ahead of news. That's what I surmise of your network's coverage of this story as well as many others. Your original position, which I can only assume you have modified after being proven wrong, was laughable even if your facts were correct. I don't know if you're old enough to remember Watergate. I was trying to imagine Ben Bradlee or Katherine Graham calling off the Washington Post's Watergate investigation because an 18-and-a-half-minute gap had been discovered in a critical White House recording. It's a good thing we had more determined media executives – and reporters – in the 1970s than we have today. While most of the big corporate media coverage of this story has been AWOL, CNN's is in a class by itself. It speaks for itself as well. As an example, I would cite this report CNN prepared on Lou Dobbs' program when he was absent.

Is this what you would call an "objective" report? Is this what you would call "balanced"? Is this what you would call "fair"? It's a 6-minute-45-second report. More than half was a one-sided set-up. Then two people who actually know something about the controversy are given less than two minutes to explain to the nation why the president of the United States has never proven his constitutional eligibility for office. Then two people who know nothing about the issue go on a name-calling binge – including maligning my own news agency, the only one that has actually investigated the story. [CONTINUE READING]

White House bashed for health care 'snitch' program

Senator says there's no precedent for citizens reporting 'fishy' comments Posted: August 05, 2009 9:28 pm Eastern By Bob Unruh © 2009 WorldNetDaily Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, today demanded that President Obama either halt a program already widely known in the blogosphere as the "snitch" program or define how he will protect the privacy of those who send or are the subject of e-mails to the flag@whitehouse.gov e-mail address. The White House announced the program only a day earlier, pleading with people around the nation to forward to the White House e-mail address anything they might see "about health insurance reform that seems fishy." "I am not aware of any precedent for a president asking American citizens to report their fellow citizens to the White house for pure political speech that is deemed 'fishy' or otherwise inimical to the White House's political interests," the Texas senator wrote in a letter today to Obama. "By requesting that citizens send 'fishy' e-mails to the White House, it is inevitable that the names, e-mail addresses, IP addresses, and private speech of U.S. citizens will be reported… You should not be surprised that these actions taken by your White House staff raise the specter of a data collection system." [CONTINUE READING]

Glenn Beck Exposes America's ENEMIES

From USArulesOverObama on June 14, 2009:

Obama talks, but his words cover other actions. He looks cool and calm, but he is cold and steely. He's in a position of public service, but he sees himself as the ruler. He spoke an oath to uphold the United States Constitution ... His plan is to tear it down ... and he is tearing it down with the blessing of the Congressional Democrat majority and corrupt judges slipped into the court system long ago. No newspaper is investigating it. No TV news is reporting it. No one is exposing it, save one. Glenn Beck on FOX NEWS ("fair and unafraid") is exposing treason happening under our very noses, within our very gates, in a corrupted government ripe for a Progressive take-over. And they are taking over even as you read this: "For a long time, I went, 'how did we possibly get here'? And I didn't want to believe that we were headed down the path that we looks like we are. ... My next issue of my magazine, 'Fusion', is all about the cancer that is in this country. This is the problem in our country. It is progressivism. ... We started with this thing with Chrysler and GM, the way they're closing people down. It is, we are on the road to fascism with these czars." R.J. PESTRITTO: "The czar thing is absolutely amazing. This is what they did in the old, in the 30's in Italy. All these things that are going on right now, cars, taking over banks, health care, nation you-name-it, what makes this all fit together, what's the pattern here, we see the pattern here. It's progressivism. It was laid out in book form, in writings, in speeches, in the 1910's and the 1920's. Barack Obama is a disciple of that understanding of things. He's audacious enough to think he can actually bring it off. He's doing it in a very radical way." MATT SPALDING: "The progressives knew that their vision of government could not proceed on the basis of the original model of the separation of powers, as you were pointing in the first segment of your show tonight. So what they argued was that Congress, instead of passing specific laws, which they're supposed to do as your elected representatives, Congress should instead pass very vaguely worded laws, just like the TARP law is, and should set up a kind of network of bureaucratic agencies. And they thought that these agencies would have the expertise, very much along the lines of the czar system that we have under the Obama administration, and thought they'd have the expertise to handle this vast increase in regulation of our economy and society." Who is this Barack Hussein Obama -- A.K.A. Barry Obama -- A.K.A. Barry Soetoro (illegal alien)? http://www.obamacrimes.info/ This "website was created after research indicated that Barack Obama is not a 'natural born' citizen or a Citizen of the United States as required by the United States Constitution to be eligible for the Office of President." ~~ attorney Philip J. Berg (a registered Democrat, BTW)

Obama, Acorn, And Election Fraud

A video from DarcPrynce from October 05, 2008

A video compilation of various news clips regarding Barack Obama, the left-wing activist organization ACORN (now COI) that he used to work for, and the massive voter registration fraud they've perpetrated over the years. Produced by Edward L. Daley

Obama, Acorn, And Election Fraud

It's really too bad that so many people made the mistake of voting for Barack Hussein Obama for President. I guess they should have seen this video. Now, maybe we can work on getting Obama impeached! And he SHOULD be, since he refuses to prove he is a natural born citizen, as required by the Constitution of the United States, by refusing to provide his long-form Birth Certificate. (What is he hiding, anyway?) A must-read RELATED STORY: traces of nuts

Rush Limbaugh pummels Obama on birth certificate ~ By Joe Kovacs

Radio giant clowns about president's similarities, differences with God Posted: June 10, 2009 2:38 pm Eastern By Joe Kovacs © 2009 WorldNetDaily Nationwide attention about President Obama's lack of producing a long-form birth certificate proving his eligibility for office got a boost today when top-rated radio host Rush Limbaugh joked about the subject in comparing Obama to God. Asking rhetorically what God has in common with Obama, Limbaugh said, "Neither has a birth certificate." "How do they differ?" Limbaugh continued. "God does not think he's Obama. And there's another difference. Liberals love Obama." Limbaugh repeated the punch lines several times throughout his show and noted, "another difference is that Obama gets better press. ... Another difference is that God only demands to be worshipped once a week." Later, he sprinkled in other differences, including:

God asks for only 10 percent of your money God gives you freedom to live your life as you choose God's plan to save us is actually written down for you to read

Upon hearing the discussion, one listener in Miami phoned in to tell Limbaugh, "You're acting like you're God." The host responded, "I am better than most people but I don't think I'm God. Obama does. He's got a messianic complex." Limbaugh commented that left-leaning listeners "can't stand any comedy about Obama." The comparison to God comes after recent comments by Newsweek editor Evan Thomas, who said on MSNBC's "Hardball" that Obama was "sort of God." With the exception of extensive coverage by WND, the subject of Obama's eligibility for office based on his birth record has received little, if any, attention from large media outlets. [Continue reading]

Control your government, or it will control you! ~ By Henry Lamb

By Henry Lamb Posted: June 06, 2009 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 Few people know that there is currently legislation pending in Congress that, if enacted, would allow President Obama to run for a third term. House Joint Resolution 5 would repeal the 22nd Amendment, which limits the president to two terms in office. This is not new legislation. Rep. Jose Serrano, a Democrat who represents New York City, has introduced similar legislation in every Congress since 1997. No one has paid much attention – until now. This legislation would require approval by two-thirds of both houses, and ratification by 38 states within seven years to become law. This is a very high hurdle for Obama worshipers to jump. They have launched a website to help persuade people to get busy now so Obama can be re-elected in 2016. Never happen? Perhaps. But one year ago, who could have imagined that President Obama could fire the CEO of General Motors and put 31-year-old Brian Deese, a campaign adviser with no auto industry experience, in charge of reorganizing the corporation. Who would have believed, one year ago, that President Obama would plunge the nation into debt to the tune of nearly $9 trillion – during his first 100 days? Who could have imagined that the U.S. Congress would even consider taxing and rationing energy, as prescribed by The American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES, H.R. 2454)? Who would have believed, a year ago that the nation today would be at the brink of accepting socialized health care? No one thought that the nation could move from moderate, center-right political policies to left-wing command-and-control policies in a matter of months. No one dares scoff at H.J. Res. 5. With a strong Democrat majority in both houses of Congress and a fawning national and international media singing his praises, the president can impose all manner of evil on the nation. [Continue reading]

Notre Dang! – Angels and Demons ~ By Kevin Jackson

As Obama speaks at the Notre Dame, Dan Brown's Angels and Demons coincidentally has opened in theaters across America. Keep in mind that in Angels and Demons dark forces are attempting to destroy the Catholic Church. The irony! Click here to read this great story by Kevin Jackson of The Black Sphere! digg story ~ Submitted by bettverboten

Glenn Beck Exposes ACORN & Their Fraudulent Activities

Friday on Glenn Beck, he interviewed two women who work or worked for ACORN, Marcel Reid and Karen Inman. Reid still works for ACORN, but Inman was fired. They both, however, were removed as board members of the organization. These are two courageous women, and they are BEGGING the government to investigate ACORN and look into their finances. These women are both members of the “ACORN 8,” which they say is much larger than 8 members now.

See two more videos from this segment at Ms. UNDERESTIMATED digg story ~ Submitted by ClariceM

Barack is so articulate - with a teleprompter...

Is Obama a "gifted" speaker, or a "skilled" speaker? To answer that question, I'll ask a few more: Can Obama ever do any more than read from a script on a teleprompter? Can he speak from his heart? Is he able to think on his feet? I think the answers to those questions are clear. And, what does it say about his ability to lead this country? See this video below, or on the TheRealjohnny2k Cbannel: digg story

Obama supporters found guilty of voter fraud in Ohio

During the election, Obama supporters came to Ohio to get out the vote. Some of them voted as well. Today the Columbus Dispatch reported that three leaders of Vote Today Ohio were convicted of voter fraud. More prosecutions are likely. read more | digg story ~ Submitted by wthrockmorton

100 days in office, Obama coronated Messiah ~ By Drew Zahn

"The Truth" by Michael D'Antuono

By Drew Zahn © 2009 WorldNetDaily On his 100th day in office, President Obama will be "crowned" in messianic imagery at New York City's Union Square. Artist Michael D'Antuono's painting "The Truth" – featuring Obama with his arms outstretched and wearing a crown of thorns upon his head – will be unveiled on April 29 at the Square's South Plaza. According to a statement released about the portrait, "The 30" x 54" acrylic painting on canvas depicts President Obama appearing much like Jesus Christ on the Cross: atop his head, a crown of thorns; behind him, the dark veil being lifted (or lowered) on the Presidential Seal. But is he revealing or concealing, and is he being crucified or glorified?" Even the title of the piece, "The Truth," suggests a play on biblical themes, as Jesus said in John 14:6, "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." [Continue reading]

digg story ~ Submitted by ROaks

President Pinocchio ~ By Pat Boone

If there is anything good about Barry Obama being President, it's having outstanding columns being written by Pat Boone and others to read for the next 3 yrs and 265 days, (if the country happens to actually last that much longer, that is). Some people say we should give Obama a chance, but those first 100 days have been a real Pleasure Island. read more | digg story

Tea for 2 … million? ~ By Patrice Lewis

From the article:

Of course, the reason the media claim to be unaware of how many people attended is because they weren't there. Sure, some local TV stations had their rigs, but the big guys? No way. I guess they think if they don't cover tea parties, it means they don't exist or something. That seems to be the government's best defense right now. Marginalize. Trivialize. Aww, isn't it cute that the peasants are having tea. Now that the big day is over, everyone should toddle home like good little sheeple and be quiet. [read more]

digg story