VIDEO: America's Move to War Through Weakness - Part 2

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse!

Post by Johnny2k's America.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

Liz Cheney and 'the DOJ 19' ~ By Ellis Washington

Ellis tells about Liz Cheney's ad, from KeepAmericaSafe.com, and why the "DOJ 19" liberals and RINOs are criticizing her for using the phrase, "The al-Qaida 7."

The Obama administration is seemingly hell-bent on "fundamentally transforming America" as the president has stated on many occasions. One way to achieve his socialist revolution is by deconstructing all of America's fundamental institutions. Giving constitutional rights to avowed Muslim terrorists is merely a means to Obama's diabolical ends to purposely destabilize American society, thus setting the pretext to eventually create a one-party oligarchy.


Remember the words of chief of staff Rahm Emmanuel, which were repeated by both Obama and Hillary Clinton: You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.

By Ellis Washington

Posted: March 13, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

Truth is the best defense.

Attorney General Eric Holder

Liz Cheney, daughter of Dick Cheney, Bush-43's VP, is an unapologetic conservative and cofounder of the advocacy group "Keep America Safe." She has created a recent controversy with liberals and RINOs across America who are feigning outrage at an ad Liz Cheney's organization aired that used the phrase "The al-Qaida 7" – an unflattering epithet implying that seven of the nine Department of Justice lawyers recently appointed by Attorney General Eric Holder have ties to the defense of known Muslim terrorists.

March 03, 2010 ~ Keep America Safe: Who Are The Al Qaeda Seven?

Video provided by PaulWilliamsWorld

The central question regarding the al-Qaida 7 is not whether it is permissible or even expedient for DOJ lawyers to represent the obviously guilty, because under our system of laws, criminals are entitled to counsel, but why did they do it? If they were motivated by empathy for the terrorists, then Liz Cheney is right for stating this fact. However, if they are strict constitutionalists and desire protection of our constitutional principles and were motivated by legal principle, then Cheney is wrong.

In response to Liz Cheney's attacks against the al-Qaida 7 earlier this week, a group of 19 former top officials of the Bush Justice Department signed a declaration defending DOJ policy, including: Larry Thompson (deputy attorney general, Bush-43), Peter Keisler (acting attorney general, Bush-41), Matthew Waxman, Charles "Cully" Stimson (deputy assistant secretary of defense, Bush-43), Brandford Berenson and Daniel Dell'Orto (White House counsel, Bush-41).

Other DOJ sympathizers included John Bellinger III, a former legal adviser to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and currently a partner at the law firm of Arnold and Porter, who said regarding Liz Cheney's criticism of DOJ: "We've had a long-standing tradition in our country for lawyers to represent unpopular causes, and they shouldn't be attacked for doing so." Ken Starr, current dean of Pepperdine Law School, former solicitor general and special prosecutor during the infamous Clinton-Lewinsky sexual harassment scandal of the 1990s, said: "You do not impute the causes of the client to the lawyer who is called upon to make sure that that client's rights are being protected."

Really, Dean Starr? Where is that idea found in the Constitution?

Their GOP credentials notwithstanding, it appears that these lawyers, who I'll call "the DOJ 19" all signed that document defending Holder and seem to hold a biased view against America's original intent of the constitutional framers founded in natural-law jurisprudence. Instead these careerists are zealously defending existential DOJ bureaucracy, centralized big government and the rights of the guilty above the rights of the innocent.

The DOJ 19 defend terrorist-sympathizer Eric Holder and the al-Qaida 7, who have time to do pro bono work for Muslim terrorists – but how much time have they given to defend vilified American heroes like: Michael McCabe, Julio Huertas and Jonathan Keefe who caught Ahmed Hashim Abed, plotter of the murder of four Blackwater USA security guards in Fallujah, Iraq, in 2004? The bodies of the four Americans were burned and hanged from a bridge while Iraqis cheered on in jubilation.

The Liz Cheney controversy brings up deeper constitutional issues of natural law, original intent and the personal guarantees the constitutional framers codified in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

RELATED LINK:
KEEPAMERICAFREE.COM

Be sure to check out johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Keep America Safe

Keep America Safe: "100 Hours" from Keep America Safe on Vimeo.

Question: What does Barack Obama do now that Tiger Woods isn't doing? Answer: Play golf.

Trying terrorists, or Bush-Cheney? ~ By Joseph Farah

From WorldNetDaily

"The Obama administration is more dangerous to America in many ways than any terrorist organization. What this cabal is doing to the country in stripping it of its most cherished values, its basic morality, its foundation on the rule of law, its liberties and its economy is more devastating than anything Mohammed and his zealots could have ever imagined."

By Joseph Farah Posted: November 19, 2009 ~ 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has already had a trial and been convicted of orchestrating the 9/11 attacks on the U.S. that killed nearly 3,000. He should have been put to death by now. Instead, the Barack Obama administration is going to give him another trial – a civilian trial in New York City, of all places – where his defense team will be able to use all the gimmickry and technicalities available to American citizens trying to beat the rap. "Was our client read his Miranda rights?" they will ask. "How many times was he waterboarded?" "Was any of the evidence you are using against our clients obtained illegally?" They will attempt to turn the trial into a circus in which George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are actually accused of crimes – probably much to the satisfaction of the Obama administration, which views their actions in bringing this mass murderer to justice as illegal. Obama's attorney general, Eric Holder, already announced he would investigate whether CIA officers should be prosecuted for their interrogations of Mohammed and others. Maybe instead of prosecuting this monster, he might be called to testify on behalf of the defense. If I were in Mohammed's shoes, I certainly would. Once again, it goes to prove the point that the Obama administration doesn't view even the kind of monstrous terrorism that struck on 9/11 as anything but a criminal justice matter. [CLICK HERE TO READ MORE]

President Obama, time to make a decision ~ By Chuck Norris

From WorldNetDaily

By Chuck Norris Posted: November 02, 2009 ~ 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 Let me see if I have the facts straight. Last May, President Obama removed Gen. David D. McKiernan as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan and replaced him with Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, who in September issued a dire report warning that, without as many as 40,000 more troops for the fight in Afghanistan, the mission "will likely result in failure." President Obama rebuffed that he would make no quick decision but take as long as needed to do a broad study first on the issue. Is this about genuine concern, or could this delay simply be a politically driven tactic for upcoming state elections? Meanwhile, more U.S. troops died at the hands of our enemies. Roughly a month after McChrystal's requests, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel continued to blame the Bush administration for the chaos in the war. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs blamed former Vice President Cheney. Vice President Biden blamed the generals for a bad military plan. And presidential adviser David Axelrod blamed Fox News! Meanwhile, more U.S. troops died at the hands of our enemies. Two weeks ago, when asked about Obama's indecisiveness about McChrystal's requests, White House Press Secretary Gibbs rebuffed, "The president will make a decision in the next few weeks, in the coming weeks. I don't know when that decision will be – it could be before the (Afghanistan political) run off (on Nov. 7), it might be after the run off." Meanwhile, more U.S. troops died at the hands of our enemies. Last Friday, the president met with the joint chiefs of staff and discussed the Afghan-Pakistani situation some more and then said he wants another meeting. It has been almost two months since Gen. McChrystal first warned the president of the dire situation in Afghanistan, and yet our commander in chief continues to delay a response. Meanwhile, record numbers of U.S. troop casualties mount in Afghanistan. When our president and his administration go to war against the former administration and Fox News channel, but do not give our generals on the ground the troops that they need to win the war, something is definitely amiss. Instead of a trip to Dover Air Force Base to greet the dead coming home, Obama should send more troops to Afghanistan to protect them from dying. [CLICK HERE TO READ MORE]

Judge: Eligibility dispute is 'serious'

Says case will be expedited when representation lined up Posted: June 26, 2009 12:00 am Eastern By Bob Unruh © 2009 WorldNetDaily A judge hearing one of the cases challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president has taken the unusual step of describing the dispute as a serious constitutional issue and further has begun adding letters of comment from the public to the court record. Word of the action by U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider in Camden, N.J., comes from attorney Mario Apuzzo, who is handling the Kerchner vs. Obama case. Apuzzo filed his lawsuit in January on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. Named as defendants are Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The case focuses on the alleged failure in Congress to follow the Constitution. That document, the lawsuit states, "provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate 'elected' by the Electoral College Electors." [CONTINUE READING]

What America needs from its leaders ~ By Henry Lamb

By Henry Lamb Posted: May 30, 2009 © 2009 The media appear to delight in exploiting the plight of the Republican Party, particularly the flap between Dick Cheney and Colin Powell. Cheney's comment that he thought Powell had left the Republican Party because he endorsed Obama provided a perfect opportunity for Powell to take the TV podium to tell Republicans they must become more moderate to reverse the flight from their ranks. What America needs cannot be found in either major party at the moment, nor in any of the dozens of other parties hoping to become a "third party." The litmus test for leadership is quite simple. Voters should find candidates – regardless of party – who pass this two-issue leadership test. [Continue reading]

Digg story

Rush Limbaugh on the Glenn Beck Show (video included)

Glenn talks with Rush (by phone) on his show Thursday, 5/21/09. Rush, the former head of the Republican Party who had just stepped down the day before, tells Glenn what is worrying him the most. It's Obama, and who he is — liberal Democrat politicians who are oriented toward acquiring power. What's it going to take for American people to wake up?

read more | digg story

Obama and Cheney battle over war on terror policies

By JOSH GERSTEIN & JONATHAN MARTIN In an extraordinary crosstown debate carried live across the airwaves, President Barack Obama and former Vice President Dick Cheney battled Thursday over the Bush administration’s war on terror, with Cheney issuing a scathing rejection of the new president’s policies and saying Obama is leaving the nation exposed to attack. Cheney accused those who call Bush interrogation practices torture – as Obama has – of engaging in “contrived indignation and phony moralizing on the interrogation methods applied to a few captured terrorists.” And he urged Obama to make future national security choices based not on “slogans and campaign rhetoric, but on a truthful telling of history.” Obama, in turn, said President George W. Bush decimated the nation’s values and beliefs in a hastily conceived, poorly executed plan that left him a “mess” at Guantanamo Bay prison and American’s image abroad in tatters. Obama said the only responsible way to clean up problems at Gitmo is to bring some prisoners to the U.S. for trial, despite the intense resistance to that idea in Congress. [Continue reading at Politico]

President Barack Hussein Obama: VS. Former Vice-President Dick Cheney:

digg story ~ Submitted by vigilante1

Stop whining about Cheney ~ By David Limbaugh

Democratic strategists are free to dramatize their manufactured indignation over the charge of subordinating our national security for political gain, but their chickens are coming home to roost. Their inconsistent, untenable, reckless positions have been exposed, and they've tied themselves in knots... which explains a lot of things. read more | digg story

Obama avoids The Crocodile ~ By Pat Buchanan

If Obama has done anything right, it is in avoiding a fight with Dick Cheney over the "enhanced interrogation techniques" that Cheney approved. Obama does not want this fight, for he knows that it is highly probable that al-Qaida is going to conduct some spectacular attack on this country or its allies, and he would be blamed for it. read more | digg story

Liberal Taliban issues fatwa against Miss California ~ By Ann Coullter

Ann Coulter:

"Not even Dick Cheney can incite the blood-curdling rage of liberals at the sight of a sexy evangelical Christian. Paula Jones, Katherine Harris, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and, most recently, Miss California, Carrie Prejean, have all come under a frenzy of attacks from liberals." [Continue reading]

digg story

Chicago's Nuclear Obama -- False Flag Unfurled

Writes WtheFox in the digg description, "For as long as we held out hope that Barack Hussein Obama would halt the false flag war against the American people, we refrained from publicly impugning him. Now we have to face facts. Willful blindness to treason is a criminal offense. Silence is consent. Our oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, is lifelong..."

By Captain Eric H. May Dr. James Fetzer Major William B. Fox SFC Donald Buswell April 10, 2009

IN MID-DECEMBER, barely a month after the presidential elections and more than a month before the inauguration, we were in the doghouse with our anti-Bush cohorts for co-authoring "Black Bush Barack? False Flag Frankenstein?" In it we argued that what America hoped would be Obamalot might just turn out to be Obamageddon. A week later Pravda echoed our concerns in its equally provocative "USA needs nuclear explosion to turn world into dictatorship". "Is the United States going to put dictatorship into effect under the guise of the anti-terrorist struggle? What may trigger another major transformation in 2009? The answer is obvious: another 9/11 in the USA. Most likely, the world will witness a nuclear blast." After Obama's inauguration, his failure to reverse Bush's quasi-Nazi "Homeland State" reminded observers of the San Francisco Chronicle's astute op-ed "Rule by fear or rule by law?" "In 2007, the White House quietly issued National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51), to ensure 'continuity of government' in the event of what the document vaguely calls a 'catastrophic emergency.' Should the president determine that such an emergency has occurred, he and he alone is empowered to do whatever he deems necessary to ensure 'continuity of government.' This could include everything from canceling elections to suspending the Constitution to launching a nuclear attack. Congress has yet to hold a single hearing on NSPD-51." Obama's cabinet selections have been alarming. Rahm Emanuel, his chief of staff, was so close to Israeli intelligence that in 1998 Bill Clinton had to dismiss him from the White House staff. Robert Gates, his Bush-appointed Secretary of Defense, will likely abide the Bush "moles" in his department who were recently reported by Seymour Hersh, the Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist. Hersh also reported that Dick Cheney used military personnel in an "executive assassination ring." Obama could allay our worst anxieties by fulfilling his one-word campaign promise of change, but he hasn't done so yet, and we doubt he will. It's hard to find the anti-war Obama of two years ago in the terror-war Obama of today, or the former constitutional teacher in the current "unitary executive." His post-inaugural about-face has estranged some of his early supporters. Our co-author Dr. Jim Fetzer, a retired University of Minnesota professor and founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, was one of them. "As one who has been extremely supportive of our new president, what I personally find most troubling about the current situation is that, as a Constitutional scholar, he must know that restoring our republic to its appropriate legal footing requires the repudiation of the Patriot Act, The Military Commissions Act, unlimited surveillance of Americans, and other blatant violations of our rights. That he has yet to do so is causing me to reassess the quality of his leadership. Actions he might yet take may restore my confidence, at least to some degree, but at this point in time I have no choice but to join with my colleagues in this extremely disturbing assessment of how things appear to stand." [Continue reading]

digg story ~ Submitted by WtheFox

The Most Dangerous President Ever

Story by Marc Thiessen So Much for Listening to Dick Cheney Obama, on ABC ’s This Week: “I think that was pretty good advice, which is I should know what’s going on before we make judgments and that we shouldn’t be making judgments on the basis of incomplete information or campaign rhetoric." Less than 48 hours after taking office, Obama has begun dismantling those institutions without taking time to review. read more | digg story, submitted by mustangmike53