The ever-changing Obama nativity story ~ By Joseph Farah

From WorldNetDaily

By Joseph Farah Posted: October 30, 2009 ~ 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 In another month or so, millions will be reading the Nativity story – the one so well-chronicled by gospel-writer Luke. It's amazing to me that the details of a birth that took place nearly 2,000 years ago are so precise – complete with genealogical records dating back eons. Yet, today, even the most basic birth information about the man occupying arguably the most powerful office in the world is murky – and ever-changing. Nevertheless, if you dare to ask questions about Barack Obama's birth, even questions about facts required to establish his constitutional eligibility for office, you will be pilloried, ridiculed, written off as a wacko, characterized as a "fringe" extremist, even labeled a "racist." What raises this issue for me, again, is the fact that even Barack and Michelle Obama are telling two entirely contradictory stories about his birth – and even this raises no questions in the minds of uniformly unquestioning media types. In case you missed it, Michelle Obama stated at a public event last year during the campaign that Barack Obama's mother was unmarried when she gave birth. Now, I don't really care, except for the fact that Barack Obama has told a different story – in his autobiography and elsewhere. Is it important in and of itself? No. But what's important to note is that there is no documentation to ascertain the facts. And that's what the so-called "birther" issue is all about. Yes, I am nearly alone among the press in demanding that Barack Obama actually produce some evidence that he is eligible to serve as president. I also insist on seeing documentation of other claims he has made about his life – school records, travel records, health records, selective service registration records and so on. Why? [CLICK HERE TO READ MORE]