Monday, January 20, 2020
The Solution to Mass Shootings, Crime, and Your Own Personal Struggles - JJ McNown - Video
It isn't the proverbial "fad" like some on the left would try to tell you. It isn't a bunch of people that jumped on a bandwagon because it was the cool thing to do - at the moment. No, heck no! It is because a bunch of people found out that there were a bunch of people that felt the same way that a bunch of people felt - which was, this country is falling apart because of a certain mindset in the "political class" known as the Left...
Okay, enough of my rant. Just check these things out. I know you are busy. I know it's hard to keep up on everything, always so much to do. However, I say that with emphasis, I'm about to make my own announcement soon, on a way we can help you stay informed while being so busy with life.
Saturday, January 31, 2015
VIDEO: Why the Left is bashing American Sniper: They just don't get it!
As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text. Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse.
ONE NATION UNDER GOD
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
The Khorosan Group Does Not Exist ~ By Andrew C. McCarthy
You haven’t heard of the Khorosan Group because there isn’t one. It is a name the administration came up with, calculating that Khorosan — the Iranian–Afghan border region — had sufficient connection to jihadist lore that no one would call the president on it.
Barack Obama's administration depends on people being the typical low-info sheeple. That translates into low-info voters. However, now the story is out, and thanks to Andy McCarthy, there's no way to ever get this story erased from the minds of the sheeple if they see or hear about it. Sadly, they probably won't. Isn't it sad that We the People have to be deceived in order for some people to be able to stay in power? Just sayin'...
The Khorosan Group Does Not Exist
It’s a fictitious name the Obama administration invented to deceive us.
Andrew C. McCarthy
By Andrew C. McCarthy
September 27, 2014 4:00 AM
From National Review Online
We’re being had. Again.
For six years, President Obama has endeavored to will the country into accepting two pillars of his alternative national-security reality. First, he claims to have dealt decisively with the terrorist threat, rendering it a disparate series of ragtag jayvees. Second, he asserts that the threat is unrelated to Islam, which is innately peaceful, moderate, and opposed to the wanton “violent extremists” who purport to act in its name.
Now, the president has been compelled to act against a jihad that has neither ended nor been “decimated.” The jihad, in fact, has inevitably intensified under his counterfactual worldview, which holds that empowering Islamic supremacists is the path to security and stability. Yet even as war intensifies in Iraq and Syria — even as jihadists continue advancing, continue killing and capturing hapless opposition forces on the ground despite Obama’s futile air raids — the president won’t let go of the charade.
Hence, Obama gives us the Khorosan Group.
The who?
There is a reason that no one had heard of such a group until a nanosecond ago, when the “Khorosan Group” suddenly went from anonymity to the “imminent threat” that became the rationale for an emergency air war there was supposedly no time to ask Congress to authorize.
~~~ READ MORE on National Review Online ~~~
As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text. Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse.
ONE NATION UNDER GOD
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear
Thursday, March 20, 2014
VIDEO: Be prepared for something big to come soon
Which scenario would help Obama the most, though? Disparaging the thought that there is still terrorism, or a major rescue of the people on that flight, landed somewhere, like in Pakistan?
Wait, maybe the best thing would be to tell the truth, no matter how it all works out. If the missing Flight MH370 went down, it is more likely to have been caused by terrorism than a mechanical failure. If it was a mechanical failure, so they say, hopefully it will be a more convincing theory than a center fuel tank exploding from a spark. I'd hate to see how the Obama minions in the mainstream press try to make it out to be workplace violence.
So, the possible debris from the missing flight is out floating on the ocean. That's pretty convenient, just a day after relatives of Chinese passengers had a melt down about finding their loved ones! I'm just sayin'...
Please note: To see the following video, you must be logged in to Facebook.
As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text. Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse!
Please note: To see the johnny2k’s America videos on this blog, you must be logged in to Facebook.
ONE NATION UNDER GOD
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear
Monday, May 02, 2011
Osama bin Laden dies in firefight, body in U.S. custody
In addition to bin Laden, one of his sons, two couriers and a woman died as she was used as a human shield when the soldiers stormed the house.
Former President George W. Bush said in a statement that he had personally been informed by Obama of the death of the terrorist leader whose attacks forever defined his eight years in office.
"This momentous achievement marks a victory for America, for people who seek peace around the world, and for all those who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001," the former president said.
"The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done."
When I first heard the news and the President's statement, I was very happy about it. But, it hit me soon after: Do we really know it was Osama in Laden? They said a DNA test was done, and it was determined to be bin Laden. But there will always be questions. Not everyone is going to believe the government's story. I'm not sure I do or not yet. Do you? (Please see my latest update below. I DO believe we got bin Laden. He sleeps with the fish!)
UPDATE:
Wait a minute... Something seems to be wrong with this story. What is going on?WASHINGTON | Mon May 2, 2011 3:50am EDT
(Reuters) - The body of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was taken to Afghanistan after he was killed in Pakistan and was later buried at sea, the New York Times reported on Monday.
I heard the news about the burial at sea while listening to Coast to Coast A.M. Monday morning. George Noory, the show's host, was incredulous about the fact that we don't have the body now. Callers to the show in the last few minutes after George had heard the news about the burial at sea from his colleague and frequent guest, Richard Hoagland, were just as incredulous, disbelieving, distrustful, doubtful, dubious, hesitant, mistrustful, questioning, skeptical, suspicious, uncertain, unconvinced, and/or wary as was George. There were many words that could describe the apprehensive response to this news. But every one of the callers and guests to Coast to Coast A.M. could only come up with one thought: Something is very wrong here!
Another update: I just heard that the other bin Laden associates killed along with the terror mastermind have NOT been buried yet (the Muslim tradition is to bury the body within 24 hours of death).
Another update (at 7:50 A.M. Central):
I would not worry about the people that were worrying about Obama sleeping with the fish so quickly. No, I join ALL Americans in the victory rally today! We got the evil man, and let's celebrate! And my thanks to all of our military for all that they do. God bless America! Hoooo-Rah!
Osama bin Laden dies in firefight, body in U.S. custody
Al-Qaida kingpin dies in mansion outside Islamabad
May 01, 2011 ~ 11:24 pm Eastern
© 2011 WorldNetDaily
Al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden is dead and the U.S. has his body, according to U.S. and Pakistani officials.
OSAMA bin LADEN
The terror mastermind of al-Qaida repsonsible for the 9/11 attacks on America was shot in the head by U.S. forces in a mansion outside the Pakistani capital of Islamabad.
President Obama made the announcement in a national address late Sunday night from the White House, calling bin Laden a terrorist responsible for the murder of thousands of American men, women and children.
"Last August, after years of painstaking work by our intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible to lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain and it took many months to run this thread to the ground.
"Last week, I determined that we had enough intelligence to take action and authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden, and bring him to justice. Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties.
"After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body," said Obama. "Justice has been done."
DNA testing confirmed that it was bin Laden, sources told ABC News.
His body is "being handled in accordance with Islamic practice and tradition," one senior administration official said. He is expected to be buried at sea.
The government has not said whether a photo of bin Laden will be released to the media as proof of his death.
Video provided by UpTakeVideo on May 1, 2011
Officials long believed the 54-year-old bin Laden, the most wanted man in the world, was hiding a mountainous region along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.
READ MORE at WND.com
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Give Al Gore his due ~ By Joseph Farah
By Joseph Farah Posted: February 03, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern © 2010 I never thought Al Gore was very bright, but you've got to give the guy his due. He's got the whole world trading carbon credits and measuring carbon footprints. He has turned the economic order of the world upside-down. He's whipped up more apocalyptic hysteria than the Mayan calendar. Al Gore did all that with his invention of manmade, catastrophic global warming. And, make no mistake about it, unlike his claim to birthing the Internet, Al Gore really did invent climate change out of nothing more than computer models, a fertile imagination and political necessity. People like Al Gore actually don't like America. They want to change it in fundamental ways to make it more to their liking and so that America serves their interests rather than the interests of the American people. Think back 20 years if you are old enough. Do you remember what people like Al Gore were pushing back then – before he invented "global warming"? For one thing, they were telling us we had to produce smaller cars and drive them. Before carbon dioxide was the menace that was going to destroy the planet, it was other auto emissions. Back then it was poisonous, toxic emissions that were the problem. And Al Gore used the coercive power of the state to force automakers to reduce those emissions. When no one could rationally argue that those emissions still posed a threat to the quality of life, a new argument to change lifestyles was needed. Leave it to Al Gore to come up with the notion that carbon dioxide and water vapor emissions now threatened to destroy the world. You see, it was never about cleaner air with Al Gore in the first place. It was never about health or the environment. It was always about attacking American industry, prosperity and the free-enterprise system. So he came up with a threat that could never be solved – a phony threat that could never even be measured. READ FULL STORY >
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Bring our troops home, Part 2 ~ By Pat Boone
By Pat Boone Posted: November 21, 2009 ~ 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 I received an amazing response to my last column, in which I called loudly for the president – trying desperately to decide what to do in his newfound role as commander in chief – to issue the executive order to bring every last soldier in the Middle East home. By Christmas. Amazing to me, because most of the response was overwhelmingly affirmative and positive. I write for conservative readers, and most conservatives, like me, want to bring our troops home to waving flags and proclamations of victory. Yet most readers seem to agree with my loud call. What has become increasingly clear is that we won our victory in the first days of the invasion of Iraq. We hunted down and eventually executed Saddam Hussein, established that he had managed to sneak his WMDs over to Syria and out of our reach, and gave the Iraqi people a chance to create their own democracy – if they wanted it enough. We should have come home to the parades, declared "mission accomplished," and sent thousands of fighting men and women back to their families. But no. Partly in hubris, partly in a desire to "spread democracy," and mainly in determination to hunt down and kill Osama bin Laden, we got sucked into a rat hole, ambushed by amateurs with roadside bombs, and pushed into Afghanistan and Pakistan with our tanks and remote-controlled drones and flame throwers – to be confronted with scarcely trained but highly motivated locals who hid in caves and bushes on the hillsides. Locals who were in too many cases eager to strap on bombs and die, killing whomever they could. America's intent was to give the locals a chance at life, a better life, but many of these locals have been brainwashed to actually prefer death, if they can take others, even some of their own countrymen, with them. So what's to win? What is a "victory" for American troops in the Middle East? What can we accomplish that's worth the lives of even more of America's finest young? A couple more corrupt governments, maybe even severe setbacks to al-Qaida, possibly a dead Osama? [CLICK HERE TO READ MORE]
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Send Biden to get Osama ~ By Joseph Farah
By Joseph Farah Posted: October 17, 2009 ~ 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 I don't know why Barack Obama is having so much trouble deciding what to do about Afghanistan. He was so sure before he got elected. For starters, he ought to consult with Vice President Joe Biden. You remember Joe Biden, don't you? He is still vice president, isn't he? Well, just like Obama knew what to do in Afghanistan last year, Biden did, too. Obama wasn't waffling about sending more troops then, when the war seemed to be going better. But now that the war has hit a bit of a snag, he's not so sure. Biden was even more clear. He told us last October: "Ending the [Iraq] war will help us deal with Afghanistan, which we talked about at length this morning. In 2002, I said we should focus on finishing the fight against Osama bin Laden. Throughout this campaign, I have argued that we need more troops and more resources to win the war in Afghanistan, and to confront the growing threat from al-Qaida along the Pakistani border. "Over seven years after 9/11, the situation in Afghanistan is grave. This is the most violent year of the war, with the highest number of American casualties. The Taliban is on the offensive, al- Qaida has a sanctuary across the border in Pakistan, and some experts believe that 50 percent of the Afghan economy comes from the heroin trade. As the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently said, 'The trends across the board are not going in the right direction.' "Make no mistake: we are confronting an urgent crisis in Afghanistan, and we have to act. It's time to heed the call from General McKiernan and others for more troops. That's why I'd send at least two or three additional combat brigades to Afghanistan. We also need more training for Afghan Security forces, more non-military assistance to help Afghans develop alternatives to poppy farming , more safeguards to prevent corruption, and a new effort to crack down on cross-border terrorism. Only a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes Afghanistan and the fight against al-Qaida will succeed, and that's the change I'll bring to the White House." He said all this in his famous speech in which he predicted Obama would be tested in his first six months in office. In fact, he didn't just predict it – he "promised" it. [CLICK HERE TO READ MORE]
Friday, September 11, 2009
Why a lethal surprise like 9/11 may happen again
By Yoel Marcus, Haaretz Correspondent Last update - 03:40 11/09/2009 There are moments in life when the mind does not pick up what is visible to the naked eye. One day, during the afternoon of September 11, 2001, Israel time, I stared at the television while having my hair cut at a barber shop. I was watching the television though I could not hear what was being said in the broadcast. Suddenly, the picture changed to an image of airplanes crashing into the Twin Towers in New York. During those first few seconds, I thought I was watching one of those disaster flicks. Yet, with a thump in my heart, it quickly became apparent that we were bearing witness to the largest, most surprising terrorist attack ever committed. Its name would forever be etched in my world as the attack of "9/11." Nineteen Arab hijackers, some of whom learned aviation in the United States, covertly took control of four civilian passenger aircraft, causing the deaths of about 3,000 people, injuring some 6,000 others and inflicting hundreds of millions of dollars worth of property damage. Worst of all, it shook up the self-confidence of the world's largest superpower. Were the planes to have taken off one hour later, when the Twin Towers would have been filled with even more workers and tourists, the number of deaths could have reached tens of thousands. Nonetheless, 9/11 was a turning point. Israel feared that the Americans - both public opinion and the decision-makers in power - would lay the blame for the attack on its refusal to strike a deal with the Palestinians, causing the outburst of hatred which gave rise to the attack. Fortunately for us, this did not happen - on the contrary, the attack brought Israel closer to America on all matters relating to anti-terror cooperation. On the other hand, the attack proved fertile ground for Arab "anti-Semitism." In action movies of recent years, the bad guys and terrorists are Muslims who are often portrayed by Jewish actors. The attacks heightened the ambivalence of the relationship with Saudi Arabia, the country which gave birth to Osama bin Laden and a number of his cohorts. The humiliation on the one hand and the failure to apprehend bin Laden on the other compelled the administration to become more aggressive, thus complicating its international standing. Bush, who was hell-bent on revenge, plunged America deep into a war in Iraq that has exacted many casualties. This was despite the fact that the lethal weapon which supposedly was in Saddam Hussein's hands turned out to be a bluff. At the same time, the administration is spending billions in the hunt for bin Laden. On many occasion, the CIA and other agencies made contact with tribal leaders who promised to produce bin Laden, dead or alive, in exchange for a handsome reward. Not only did the money disappear, but so did the tribe. [CLICK HERE TO READ ENTIRE COLUMN]
Monday, March 09, 2009
Glenn Beck - Interviews - Glenn Beck talks with Chuck Norris
digg storyGLENN: If we're both sitting there and there's a nuke and you've got the red wire and the green wire and we're both sweating and you're like, I don't know, I'm going to go with my instinct, I think I'd like a little bit more. NORRIS: Hey, actually I did a movie like that called President's Man. Listen to this. No one knows about this. But in 2000 I did a movie of the week called President's Man and what I do as President's Man, when the FBI and the CIA can't take care of a situation for the president, I come in and take care of it for him. And so we did one. It was so successful that CBS wanted me to do another one. So I started thinking about a story for another movie and I was talking to Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison and I said, Kay, I said, what is the greatest threat we have in America? And she says, our greatest fear is Osama Bin Laden's going to sneak a nuclear device into our country. And I said, oh, really? So I got my writers together. We wrote a story about Osama Bin Laden sneaking a nuclear device into America and hiding it actually in Chicago, which we didn't know at the time, and he calls the president and says, "I want you to release my holy warriors from the 1993 bombing or I'm going to explode this nuclear device in your country." So I get called in -- GLENN: Wait, wait, this is in 2000 you did this? NORRIS: Yeah, this is in 2000. So anyway, I go to Afghanistan, I kidnap Osama Bin Laden, and I bring him back to the United States for trial. Then during that time -- and then the attorney general's a Muslim as well, Osama, and they get into a debate about the interpretation of the Qur'an and the, you know, the attorney general says the Qur'an talks about tolerance, you know, not war. GLENN: Did you make this movie? NORRIS: Oh, yeah. Anyway, so I do the movie, I finally find the nuclear weapon, disarm it at the last minute like Jack Bauer did. I was trying to find the right wire to cut down to two seconds. Anyway, we deliver this movie to CBS on September 7th, 2001. GLENN: Holy cow. NORRIS: Then four days later, of course, 9/11 hits. So now CBS doesn't know what to do. You know, the name of it was called Ground Zero was the name of the movie. GLENN: Has it ever been seen? NORRIS: No.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Farewell to George W. Bush - by Jane Chastain
By Jane Chastain © 2009 WorldNetDaily No one is perfect. That is true for your spouse, your children, your mom and (look in the mirror) even yourself. While we readily recognize and accept the flaws and frailties of those closest to us, somehow we expect that the person we elect to be president of the United States will live up to all our grandiose expectations and we are shocked when we discover that he is a mere mortal. That said, I say goodbye to President George W. Bush with a lot of mixed emotions. To be honest, I didn't expect a lot from this man. He had run two companies into the ground and road his father's coattails to become governor of the state of Texas. Surely, the country could do better! I was pleasantly surprised on many levels. The 2000 election was so close that Bush literally backed into the presidency without the usual amount of time one needs to assume the office with a team in place. Nevertheless, he was tested on 9-11-2001, as no other American president has been, and he met that test head-on, with strength and resolve. Nineteen days later, one day after Attorney General John Ashcroft announced that new terrorist attacks may be planned for the country in the coming week, President Bush showed unusual courage when he made good on his promise to throw out the first pitch of Game 3 of the World Series at Yankee Stadium in New York. The country was gripped with fear. We had battened down the hatches. Travel plans were cancelled and shopping trips minimized. I will never forget the night of Oct. 30, 2001, when Mr. Bush, wearing a sweatshirt emblazoned with "FDNY," in honor of the New York City Fire Department, strolled resolutely to the pitcher's mound. Yes, security was tight, but he was alone under the glaring lights, before a sellout crowd of more than 57,000 people, an easy target. How many presidents would have done that? Most would have stayed behind layers of security in the bunker. Bush, looking small and vulnerable scanned the upper decks. He paused and smiled and gave a big "thumbs-up" sign to reassure the crowd, before throwing a strike. Then, he walked off the mound to chants of "USA, USA" and the country slowly got back to normal. [Continue reading]digg story
Sunday, November 09, 2008
Bin Laden Planning to Out-Do Sept. 11 Attack











