Another Fake News Bombshell Collapses ~ Ep. 1287 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

From the Dan Bongino Show's description of this episode on youtube.com/Bongino or in his Show Notes:

In this episode, I address the explosive fake news bombshell planted in The NY Times this weekend. I discuss the tech tyrants outrageous suspension of this conservative superstar. I also address the stellar response to the riots in Oklahoma, contrasted with the explosion of violence and chaos elsewhere.

Of course, I want you to see the whole show, but definitely, you really must watch the first 18 minutes.  Dan lays it out very well, about the danger that this country is in.  What he talks about in this first segment is pretty mind blowing.  These Black Lives Matters protests are a lot different than the good old days, when President Obama was President, and we had plenty of very peaceful Tea Party rallies.  And at that time, the Fake News Media was gaslighting the American public, to believe that tea partiers were racist, because they disagreed with President Obama's policies.  Obviously, that wasn't true.  We were just a rag tag army of gun-toting, bible carrying Walmart deplorables, mostly in flyover country, that didn't care much for Socialism.  But peaceful.  And despite being lied about in the public relations war.

Those times have changed, now.  The Black Lives Matter and Antifa crowds have nothing to lose.  They have resorted to violence.  They destroy property and take lives, if not gravely injuring people, including law enforcement officers.  How long will it be before somebody decides to defend themselves and protect their property, and tragically have to take somebody's life?  Keep in mind that the protestors that are incited into terrorism (because that is what it is), are shot and killed while trying to do harm to private citizens?  Or a cop?

All the while, many police departments in Blue states and cities are told to stand down, or threatened with defunding.  Communist NYC Mayor Bill DeBlasio has already began to neuter the NYPD.  And the number of retirements from the PD force are astronomical.  So, without the police around, who are you going to call when there is a life threatening situation?  911?  Well, apparently not in Fredericksburg, Virginia.  But yes, give somebody at city hall a call (if you survive).

I surely hope that people listen to Dan, both with his warning, and what the solutions are. Also, be sure to see the bonus video I'm including below. Tucker Carlson adds some additional details and insight to the situation with the McCloskeys down in St. Louis, defending their property. I assure you, when you see the reaction from politicians, it will bake your bagels.

Be sure to see the
SHOW NOTES for Episode 1287

MUST SEE BONUS VIDEO:

Tucker: Ordinary citizens stand up as politicians cower to the rage mob

The Battle Lines Have Been Drawn ~ Ep. 1269 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

From the Dan Bongino Show's description of this episode on youtube.com/Bongino or in his Show Notes:

In this episode I address the insane “defund the police movement” and I debunk liberal myths about policing which are being used to fuel rage. I also address the inside story of the NYPD chaos and the Secret Service’s political fights.

So, there is this little piece of advice that Dan Bongino has for those out there that want to defund the police.  This is being discussed in liberal cities, like in Minneapolis, Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York.  And it isn't just stopping at defunding the police. In Minneapolis, they actually voted to dismantle the police force.  I really think that they should reconsider that proposal.  Doing away with the police force is not going to lead to any great civilization with no crime.  Actually, it would have the exact opposite affect.  Yep, just my personal opinion, based on what I know is true.  There are still unbelievably evil sociopathic people out there, and without any type of law enforcement, it would be total chaos and anarchy. 

There are three big reasons for having plenty of very well trained law enforcement officers:  The police are there to possibly prevent crimes when possible, stop crimes while they are occurring, and investigating crimes that have already occurred.   In this post, I want to focus on explaining and exploring each of those elements, which should help people understand why defunding the police is a really horrible idea. 

In the case of crime prevention, there's a thing called deterrence.  I'm sorry, but anybody that thinks that the criminal thinks about what happens if they get caught, prosecuted and found guilty, and incarcerated, is a deterrent, I would have to say they are wrong.  I know that seems hard to believe.  I couldn't even fathom the thought of being locked up in a cell, for any amount of time.  Of course, now, people are being let OUT of jail because of the Wuhan Coronavirus, so even the thought of incarceration isn't going to deter many of the hardened criminals.  The REAL deterrent to keep a crime from occurring is a police presence.   Police patrols in the squad cars, plainly marked and obvious to the criminals, and even the walking beat patrols, DO deter crime.  Defunding the police would greatly reduce the manpower needed for this element of fighting crime:  Prevention by deterrence.

The next element is very critical to your safety in this world.  Being able to call 911 when a crime is being committed, and having officers arrive soon enough to possibly save your life, would be very beneficial for your health and safety.  Of course, they can't always get to you in time, but they will try their hardest:  Lights, sirens and the whole nine yards.  But throw in a huge manpower shortage, and large gaps in coverage, and you're going to have a very serious problem.  Sadly, there are areas that would see much less coverage than is needed, and that would be in the rougher neighborhoods.  They would suffer the most.   Like Dan talks about in this episode, the police come to emergencies sometimes just to protect the fire fighters and/or the EMTs.  And who is going to direct traffic in the case of accidents on the freeway, to keep everybody safe, including you?

Finally, there is the third element for the need for plenty of funding for the police.  It always seems to be a problem when a crime has been committed, and that hopefully somebody will investigate it.  That could be you, someday:  Wanting justice for a crime that hurts you or a loved one.  Now think about it, if police departments are defunded, and they don't have the personnel to investigate, you'll be left in the dark, with no recourse (except for being a real life Charles Bronson "Death Wish" vigilantes, which you DON'T want!).   Of course, with a lack of funding, and many officers leaving the police departments, you then lose the experienced officers you would want as investigators.  There is only so much they can do.  And yet, you will still want the crime solved, and not become a cold crime.  But no, your police department was defunded, and all the good investigators went elsewhere. 

Now, when I was watching this episode, I heard Dan say that when a crime is being committed, "Who are you going to call, Ghost Busters?"  That hit me on two different levels.  First of all, that is the perfect description of the ignorance of the Liberals, and tells you how little they have thought through their suggestion that the police can be defunded or eliminated.  But the second level, one that I care about, and might mean nothing to you, is my question in the back of my mind:  Is Dan Bongino reading my blogs or tweets?  Just wondering.  I'd be honored if he was.

Please watch this episode if you haven't already.  Let me know if you think I am right, which you can do by sharing the link and tweet(s) I do to promote this wonderful episode.  Thank you, Dan Bongino, for all that you do, and have done in law enforcement.

SHOW NOTES for Episode 1269

• Why Socialism Sucks. An Interview with Dinesh D’Souza ~ Ep. 1268 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

My Apologies ~ Ep. 1265 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

From the Dan Bongino Show's description of this episode on youtube.com/Bongino or in his Show Notes:

In this episode, I address the exploding controversy over this action by President Trump. I discuss the new revelations in the Mike Flynn case which will rock your core. I also address my appearance on Hannity last night and I explain what happened.

On a very sincere note to begin the show, Dan gives a very heart felt mea culpa for using the Lord's name in vain when he was on the Sean Hannity Show on Tuesday (June 2, 2020).  He was in total repentance, fully acknowledging his guilt, and apologizing for what he did.  Umm, do you remember when former President Obama's pastor, "Reverend" Jeremiah Wright gave his mea culpa for using the Lord's name in vain?  Well, I don't either!  I don't think he did, unless the press never reported that.

It was great to see Dan getting back to the Gen. Mike Flynn saga in the show.  I thought it was a highlight moment of the ages when Dan briefed us on the Noel Francisco Brief in regard to Michael Flynn's Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.  So, the Solicitor General of the United States would just make it all up?  Just alluding to what Liberals will probably tell you.  You better try real hard, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff or CNN and PMSNBC dimwits, because it's going to be pretty difficult to discredit the people that signed that little note to an Appeals Court.  Good luck with that.  They'd have to be morons to attempt that sabotage.  Oh, wait...

Okay, I'm on a roll here, but there is SO much to this show for you to see and hear for yourself.  Only if you are trying to write a blog about it do you have to keep going back to his Show for information, because otherwise, this one will tell you right up front that this is about a true battle between good and evil.  And you know?  I think the police are the good guys!  And they will try to keep protestors and the public safe to the best of their abilities, and sometimes at a very high cost. I hope and pray that the protestors get very smart, which they truly are, and start turning in the REAL bad guys that have been hijacking a legitimate cause, for very evil purposes.  I'll let Dan explain.

SHOW NOTES for Episode 1265

Muslims' and blacks' 'oppression' racket ~ By Erik Rush

Erik discusses how America was taught "tolerance" of the radical racism and sedition from those who were once "oppressed" through two generations of propaganda. Obviously, there are still some of us left that see and understand how suicidal it is for America to virtually ignore the dangers that face this country. Too many Americans may not know that our freedom could be at stake. Just sayin'....

So, Americans are being admonished to minimize or ignore clear threats to our security and survival and tolerate the racism and sedition of those who were once oppressed by virtue of the fact that they were once oppressed. Thanks to two generations of propaganda, there are now enough Americans receptive to these messages to "buy" them – insane and suicidal though they may be.

These beliefs survive and flourish because that is now what the market will bear.

By Erik Rush

Posted: June 10, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

For centuries, it has been Muslims' standard operating procedure to build mosques in the places of conquered enemies' razed churches, temples, government buildings, palaces, etc. This bit of historical trivia and its implications are not being reported by the establishment press, however. It has been left for others to call the mosque slated to be built within a stone's throw of Ground Zero in New York City what it is: a massive wad of germy, gelatinous phlegm launched directly into America's face.

Last month, when they should have been beaten in the street for even considering the approval of the mosque's construction, New York City's Community Board 1 unanimously approved the plan for Cordoba House, a 15-story "mosque, museum and cultural center." Apparently, the duplicitous Imam Feisal Abdula Rauf (a principal of the Cordoba Initiative) managed to convince the Manhattan intellectuals on the Board that this effort will help to "heal" the rift between Muslims and New Yorkers.

Sort of like erecting a statue of Adolf Hitler in Tel Aviv might have improved the relationship between Germans and Jews in the late 1940s, I suppose. Rauf is also a member of the Free Gaza Movement, which helped bankroll the flotilla intercepted by the Israeli navy on May 31.

On June 6, author/activist Pamela Geller, director of Stop the Islamization of America, appeared on CNN with Muslim journalist Ahmed Soliman to discuss the local uproar that arose following the city's approval of the project. As Gellar calmly explained what an affront this disgrace would be and why, the insipid CNN anchorette absolutely could not restrain herself from defending the scheme and repeatedly interrupting Geller. The smarmy Soliman obviously knew he was in a friendly country.

Americans are not being informed of the fact that it is Islamic practice to build over "conquered territory" as well as lie to infidels, much in the same way a law-enforcement official might lie to a seasoned criminal during an interrogation; in the case of jihad, this sort of action is considered quite moral.

Moderate-appearing Muslim leaders lie regarding their radical intentions, and Americans buy it because CNN anchorettes tell them to – much in the same way they habitually misrepresent subversive machinations in general these days.

Meanwhile, there is a symposium being organized by the New Black Panther Party, some of its satellite organizations and old-school black radicals for this fall in New York – this, of course, unless they all manage to gun each other down in the interim. At first blush, I'm sure many a reader will muse as to why an outfit such as the New Black Panther Party (whose slogan is "Freedom or Death") even exists, but it does.

"The 2010 Black Power Convention" will be put down as political eccentricity to some, but it represents a potent anti-American, anti-white and anti-Semitic creed that is more dangerous in some ways than the 1960s brand of radical black nationalism. Given the duration and consistency of the "black oppression" message as it has been advanced by career civil-rights activists since desegregation, many blacks – particularly young ones – are even more cynical and jaded today vis-à-vis their future, their place in America and whites than were their grandparents.

Malik Zulu Shabazz, national chairman of the New Black Panther Party, and "Minister" Hashim Nzinga, the party's national chief of staff, are advertised as "the conveners" of this event. Neither of these gentlemen – and I use the term loosely – appears old enough to have experienced any meaningful instances of racism in America, yet their rhetoric more than suggests that blacks are in imminent danger of outright enslavement once again.

So, what's the tie-in between a proposed mosque in New York and an NBPP hate-fest in the fall?

Well, when superstar athletes are paid tens of millions, or even hundreds of millions of dollars in endorsements by multi-billion dollar merchandisers, people ask in astonishment how these corporations can justify bestowing such princely sums upon these people.

The answer? Because that's what the market will bear. The benefit to the companies outweighs the cost – which means they're making a whole lot more than they're paying the superstars.

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Profits derived from your purchases
will help me to attend tea party rallies,
(especially the one in Las Vegas, on July 15-17)!

Fretting: Nearly 2 of 3 expect terror trials to spark attack

From WorldNetDaily

Survey: Fear of retribution very real across America By Bob Unruh Posted: December 27, 2009 - 8:06 pm Eastern © 2009 WorldNetDaily Editor's note: This is another in a series of monthly "WND/WENZEL POLLS" - polls conducted exclusively for WND by the public opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies. Nearly two out of three Americans expect another new terror attack to accompany the New York City court trials for detainees who are suspects in the 9/11 attacks in 2001, according to a new poll from Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies. "The fear of retribution from terrorists is very real all across America, the survey shows. Nearly two out of every three respondents – 61 percent – said they think it is likely that New York City will experience a terrorist attack, either before, during, or immediately after the terrorist trials," Wenzel said. "Just 28 percent said they thought it was unlikely that such an attack would occur. In a year that saw President Obama's job approval rating move from 69 percent positive the day after he took office to just 41 percent positive in this survey, this has got to be seen as one of the reasons. Obama has pursued an agenda that has been opposed by a majority of Americans since their announcement, and as he continues to push them through to fruition, the American public is responding with unprecedented negativity," he said. The WND/Wenzel telephone survey was conducted Dec. 18-21 using an automated telephone technology calling a random sampling of listed telephone numbers. The survey included 26 questions and carries a 95 percent confidence interval. It included 823 likely voters. It carries a margin of error of 3.4 percentage points. READ FULL STORY >