MSNBC's Chris Hayes calls Bundy ranch supporters 'insurgents' ~ By Joe Newby

Of course, when Hayes uses terms like "insurgents" to describe Bundy supporters, he too, is helping to spur the left wing hate machine in its ongoing "two minutes hate" against the Bundys, their supporters and anyone on the right. Hayes was not the only one to call Bundy supporters "insurgents," Watson said.

One of Hayes' guests, leftist author Michelle Goldberg, wasted no time calling Bundy ranch supporters "right wing insurgents." She went on to compare them to Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and accused them of plotting to take over the U.S. government.

"Last time I checked, they just wanted the feds to return Bundy’s cattle," Watson said.

Here is my motivation for posting this story by Joe Newby, along with the associated stories and videos:

Bundy is a domestic terrorist. You've got to be one of the biggest idiots on Facebook. Well, you and Fox News.

The above comment statement appeared on a Facebook group after I shared one of my videos with them. Wow, what a cunning person to come up with something so original! Well... Actually, NOT really, as it smells of the typical liberal troll.  Along with Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) making statements about the supporters of Cliven Bundy being "domestic terrorists" and other false claims, now we have those on the left who are now making even more harsh allegations against those of us that have been reporting on the Bundy Ranch cattle battle.  Richard Escow, writing for Salon.com, claims that Sean Hannity will have blood on his hands for attempting to touch off a tinderbox by promoting "Cliven Bundy’s war."

So, now it isn't just Cliven Bundy and his supporters who are receiving massive focus from Harry Reid and the Liberal Democrat minions, but also those that are trying to report the story in a fair and balanced way. Keep in mind, that when it comes to Fox News, various hosts such as Greta Van Susteren and Megyn Kelly are attorneys, and even they say that Bundy is most likely in the wrong when it comes to the law! It is absolutely laughable that those folks on the Left are now turning their attack towards people like me, or Fox News, but that is just the way they roll.

So, they've done it now.  I've been inspired to include the following two videos that I've recently posted that the liberal columnists and trolls would like to discredit:

Please note:  To see the following videos, you must be logged in to Facebook.
Is Harry Reid just trying to stoke up a violent incident?

Post by Johnny2k's America.

Who are the REAL domestic terrorists?

Post by Johnny2k's America.

So, I'd advise you to back off, Liberal trolls and "Dirty Harry" Reid, but it's probably too late. You aren't going to like the backlash against your false accusations. Stay tuned!  Just sayin'...

RELATED STORIES:

• April 22, 2014 ~ MSNBC Smears Bundy Supporters as “Insurgents,” Attacks Infowars, Drudge ~ By Paul Joseph Watson

• April 22, 2014 ~ Liberals on Twitter demand feds kill Bundy family, supporters with drones ~ By Joe Newby

• April 18, 2014 ~ Harry Reid: Bundy supporters 'domestic terrorists,' hints at federal task force ~ By Joe Newby

• April 16, 2014 ~ VIDEO: What happens when We the People rise up?

*    *    *    *

MSNBC's Chris Hayes calls Bundy ranch supporters 'insurgents'

By Joe Newby

April 23, 2014

From Spokane examiner.com

The propaganda effort to demonize anyone to the right of Josef Stalin continues, as MSNBC's Chris Hayes called supporters of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy "insurgents," Paul Joseph Watson said at Infowars Tuesday. Hayes and his guests spent about 15 minutes in what was clearly a propaganda effort designed to marginalize Bundy supporters and certain alternate media outlets as fringe kooks.

In addition to calling Bundy supporters "insurgents," Watson said Hayes lamented "the threat posed to the establishment by an Alex Jones-Drudge-Fox News-Rand Paul 'axis' that threatens to rock the 2016 presidential race." Hayes also linked Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., to his "axis" for calling Bundy Ranch supporters "patriots."

As a result of heated rhetoric like that used by Hayes, liberals have begun calling for the Bundys and their supporters to be killed by the federal government. As we reported Tuesday, a number of angry leftists have demanded the feds destroy the ranch and kill everyone present with drones.

Is this what Hayes and his ilk ultimately want? It certainly seems so, given that the rhetoric appears to become more shrill and violent every day.

~~~ READ MORE on Spokane examiner.com ~~~

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse!

Please note:  To see the johnny2k’s America videos on this blog, you must be logged in to Facebook.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

New Bill Gives Obama ‘Kill Switch’ To Shut Down The Internet

And yet another story about the Net "Kill Switch" which I am including as it gives another perspective about this situation. (See RELATED STORIES at the bottom of this page following the story.) There are also some links to information that wasn't provided in the two previous stories that I've posted this weekend. But, to be starkly up front with you, what really drew me to this column is the following graphic!

Barry at the Net "Kill Switch"

We have extensively covered efforts to scrap the internet as we know it and move toward a greatly restricted “internet 2″ system. Handing government the power to control the Internet would only be the first step towards this system, whereby individual ID’s and government permission would be required simply to operate a website.

The Lieberman bill needs to be met with fierce opposition at every level and from across the political spectrum. Regulation of the Internet would not only represent a massive assault on free speech, it would also create new roadblocks for e-commerce and as a consequence further devastate the economy.

Government would have “absolute power"
to seize control of the world wide web
under Lieberman legislation

By Paul Joseph Watson

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

The federal government would have “absolute power” to shut down the Internet under the terms of a new US Senate bill being pushed by Joe Lieberman, legislation which would hand President Obama a figurative “kill switch” to seize control of the world wide web in response to a Homeland Security directive.

Lieberman has been pushing for government regulation of the Internet for years under the guise of cybersecurity, but this new bill goes even further in handing emergency powers over to the feds which could be used to silence free speech under the pretext of a national emergency.

“The legislation says that companies such as broadband providers, search engines or software firms that the US Government selects “shall immediately comply with any emergency measure or action developed” by the Department of Homeland Security. Anyone failing to comply would be fined,” reports ZDNet’s Declan McCullagh.

The 197-page bill (PDF) is entitled Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act, or PCNAA.

Technology lobbying group TechAmerica warned that the legislation created “the potential for absolute power,” while the Center for Democracy and Technology worried that the bill’s emergency powers “include authority to shut down or limit internet traffic on private systems.”

The bill has the vehement support of Senator Jay Rockefeller, who last year asked during a congressional hearing, “Would it had been better if we’d have never invented the Internet?” while fearmongering about cyber-terrorists preparing attacks.

The largest Internet-based corporations are seemingly happy with the bill, primarily because it contains language that will give them immunity from civil lawsuits and also reimburse them for any costs incurred if the Internet is shut down for a period of time.

“If there’s an “incident related to a cyber vulnerability” after the President has declared an emergency and the affected company has followed federal standards, plaintiffs’ lawyers cannot collect damages for economic harm. And if the harm is caused by an emergency order from the Feds, not only does the possibility of damages virtually disappear, but the US Treasury will even pick up the private company’s tab,” writes McCullagh.

Tom Gann, McAfee’s vice president for government relations, described the bill as a “very important piece of legislation”.

As we have repeatedly warned for years, the federal government is desperate to seize control of the Internet because the establishment is petrified at the fact that alternative and independent media outlets are now eclipsing corporate media outlets in terms of audience share, trust, and influence. (Emphasis my own)

We witnessed another example of this on Monday when establishment Congressman Bob Etheridge was publicly shamed after he was shown on video assaulting two college students who asked him a question. Two kids with a flip cam and a You Tube account could very well have changed the course of a state election, another startling reminder of the power of the Internet and independent media, and why the establishment is desperate to take that power away.

READ FULL STORY at PrisonPlanet.com

RELATED STORIES:
Should president have Net 'kill switch'? ~ By Joseph Farah
Is Obama getting Web 'kill switch'?

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Dissenters To Be Detained As “Enemy Belligerents”?

I happened to come across this story tonight, and decided that it needed to be posted, even though it is a little over a month old. I am wondering if - especially thanks to this blog - I'd be determined to be an "enemy belligerent"? If so, can you imagine all the people like Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck that I could get to meet in the detention camp?

Homeland Security is already implementing technology to be enforced at “security events” which purportedly reads “malintent” on behalf of an individual who passes through a checkpoint. Perhaps the video below explains just how “enemy belligerents” will be identified on American soil.

New bill allows U.S. citizens to be kidnapped and detained without trial indefinitely based on “suspected activity”

By Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet.com

Monday, March 8, 2010

Since the establishment media is convinced that tea party members, 9/11 truthers, libertarians, Ron Paul supporters, and basically anyone with a dissenting political opinion is a likely domestic terrorist, they should be celebrating the fact that a new bill would allow the government to detain such people as “enemy belligerents” indefinitely and without trial based on their “suspected activity”.

The “Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010,” introduced by Senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman on Thursday with little fanfare, “sets out a comprehensive policy for the detention, interrogation and trial of suspected enemy belligerents who are believed to have engaged in hostilities against the United States by requiring these individuals to be held in military custody, interrogated for their intelligence value and not provided with a Miranda warning,” writes the Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder.

The full bill can be read here (PDF).

The bill does not distinguish between U.S. citizens and non-citizens, and states that “suspected belligerents” who are “considered a “high-value detainee” shall not be provided with a Miranda warning.”

A person is considered a “high value detainee” if they fulfil one of the following criteria.

(1) poses a threat of an attack on civilians or civilian facilities within the U.S. or U.S. facilities abroad; (2) poses a threat to U.S. military personnel or U.S. military facilities; (3) potential intelligence value; (4) is a member of al Qaeda or a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda or (5) such other matters as the President considers appropriate.

Now that the Southern Poverty Law Center and the federal government, via the MIAC report and innumerable other leaked documents, now consider virtually anyone with a dissenting opinion against the state as “posing a threat,” millions of peaceful American citizens could be swept up by this frightening dragnet of tyranny.

However, according to the bill, an individual doesn’t even have to pose a threat to be snatched, detained and interrogated – they can merely be deemed to be of “potential intelligence value” or come under the vague and sweeping mandate of “such other matters as the President considers appropriate”.

This last designation hands Obama dictator powers to have any American citizen kidnapped, detained, and interrogated on a whim.

The only proviso that even hints at some form of check or balance is the measure that states, “The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must make a preliminary determination whether the detainee is an unprivileged enemy belligerent within 48 hours of taking detainee into custody.”

"The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must submit its determination to the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General after consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General make a final determination and report the determination to the President and the appropriate committees of Congress. In the case of any disagreement between the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General, the President will make the determination," states the bill.

READ FULL STORY at PrisonPlanet.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Your purchases will help me to fund attending tea party rallies,

and maybe even buy a new computer someday!