Smoking Gun: Trail of Benghazi lies loops back to White House

Most national news outlets have been either lazy or just derelict in their pursuit of the Benghazi scandal since the story first broke. Now they're going beyond indolent, turning a blind eye -- or at least a jaundiced one -- to damning evidence that's being served up on a platter.

A junior sleuth from a high-school newspaper could connect the dots on this one. There's no elusive paper trail to follow, no obscure documents to uncover, no shadowy Deep Throat sources to interrogate.

The evidence is right there in black and white. It's. All. Right. There.

It's funny, because I didn't even work on a high school newspaper, let alone any media outlet, and here I am writing about this "smoking gun." As a blogger, especially in this venue, I'm not out investigating. I'm just the guy down in his basement - literally - reporting on what I've found out just by paying attention. Just telling you all what is out there, right out in the light of day, in black and white.

The way I figure it, there will be a lot coming out over the next few days, weeks, or months. The question I have to ask is, will people care enough to follow this story for very long? As Shrillary had suggested, "what difference, at this point, does it make?" It scares me that this story could be destined for the back burner, if not the dustbins of history. Whether or not it makes a difference, at this point, I'm not about to let this story go. It was hard enough to have to say goodbye to the missing Flight MH370 story, without a shred of resolution.

Who knows if what I blog can make any difference, other than helping those that haven't been able to follow the story closely. Really, a lot of people do not have the time to see everything going on, and that includes me. However, if you ARE one of those folks that don't have time to see every little bit of information that is available about the Benghazi cover-up of the Obama administration ineptitude, you will want to keep watching this blog site. I'll be doing my very best to keep up with it all. It may start getting pretty interesting. Stay tuned! I'm just getting started! Just sayin'...

RELATED STORY:

• May 2, 2014 ~ Rep. Gowdy: 'I Have Evidence' of Benghazi Cover-Up ~ By Todd Beamon

*    *    *    *

Smoking Gun: Trail of Benghazi lies loops back to White House

By Augusta Chronicle (GA)

May 1, 2014 6:55 am

Via GOPUSA.com

The truth about Benghazi is finally trickling out. The curtains are lifting. The "smoking gun" has been found.

And how do the news media respond to a lying White House caught red-handed -- in a scandal far worse than Watergate, the political scandal by which all others are judged?

They don't.

Virtually all major news outlets Tuesday ignored the newly declassified emails that confirm -- for the first time -- that top White House officials put forth lies about the 2012 attack at the U.S. consulate in Libya that killed four Americans.

The emails, the first hard evidence leading straight to the White House, actually spell out that the purpose of the false narrative was to insulate President Obama from foreign policy criticism during his re-election bid.

~~~ READ MORE on GOPUSA.com ~~~

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

Something rotten in Pennsylvania ~ By Patrick J. Buchanan

Bill Clinton and Joe SestakBefore you read Pat's column, you should know that the problem with Sestak has been solved since this column was published. Apparently, if you can believe it, the White House had requested Bill Clinton to urge Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) to drop out of the race for Arlen Spectre's Senate seat. But as a tweeter, jimgeraghty, tweeted jokingly, "I want you to listen to me. I'm gonna say this again. I did not... have... effectual conversations with that man... Mr. Sestak." In other words, does anyone believe this White House spin? I believe that a tweet written by Fred Thompson amplifies that sentiment: "Re: Clinton & Sestak: the point man on this credibility issue is only President in history to have been impeached for perjury."

With that being said, I can say that I agree with Pat on his assessment, even if we can all legitimately suspect that the matter is being swept under the rug. At any rate, Pat's column does contain some interesting history about other "political deals" that have gone unpunished. Will the Sestak deal go the same way? Do you really think Eric Holder will get a special prosecutor to investigate any improprieties? Are we to believe the only President in history to have been impeached for perjury? The White House is apparently thinking that Clinton's explanation has solved the problem. That's their plan and they're sticking to it. Just sayin'...

RELATED STORY:
White House Asked Bill Clinton to Urge Sestak to Drop Out of Senate Race

Holder should immediately alert the White House counsel's office to gather and preserve all files, records of interrogations and e-mails related to an investigation that exonerated, or perhaps whitewashed, the White House.

Before voters go to the polls, especially before they choose a senator in Pennsylvania, this smelly deal needs to be aired out.

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted: May 27, 2010 ~ 6:10 pm Eastern

© 2010

When does a political deal become a bribe?

At the 1952 Republican National Convention, California's favorite son, Gov. Earl Warren, released his delegation reportedly in return for Ike's promise that he would give Warren the first open seat on the Supreme Court.

In September 1953, Chief Justice Fred Vinson dropped dead of a heart attack. As they say, the rest is history.

In 1824, Andrew Jackson won a plurality of both the popular and electoral votes, but not a majority. Secretary of State John Quincy Adams came in second; Speaker of the House Henry Clay fourth.

Between Jackson and Clay, however, there was a great hate. When Gen. Jackson had gone rogue in Florida, hanging two British subjects for aiding renegade Indians and packing the Spanish governor onto a boat to Havana, almost igniting war with Spain and Britain, Clay had charged Jackson with Caesarism.

The general told friends that when Congress adjourned, he was going to challenge Clay to a duel and kill the speaker of the House.

With no majority in the Electoral College, the contest went to the House. There, Speaker Clay persuaded supporters to back Adams, who emerged with a 13-7 victory among state congressional delegations.

Jackson's supporters were doubly enraged when Adams named as his secretary of state – stepping stone to the presidency for Jefferson, Madison, Monroe and Adams himself – Henry Clay.

"Corrupt bargain!" went the cry. No investigation was held, but a disgusted nation would give Jackson two terms as president and deny Clay his life's ambition in all three of his runs.

At his death in 1845, Jackson reportedly told friends he had but two regrets – that he had not "hanged (John) Calhoun and shot Clay."

Which brings us to Rep. Joe Sestak's claim that he was offered an administration job if he would abandon his race against Sen. Arlen Specter for the Democratic nomination in Pennsylvania. Reportedly, the job offered to the retired admiral was secretary of the navy.

On May 18, Sestak won that primary, and his charge that he was proffered a White House bribe, or deal, went viral.

So, today, Joe has a problem. And so does the White House.

For if Sestak was offered a high post in the administration to abandon his challenge to a U.S. senator endorsed by Obama, this would seem on its face a criminal violation of federal law.

All seven Senate Republicans on the judiciary committee have written Attorney General Eric Holder calling for an independent counsel to investigate the alleged bribe. They cite 18 U.S. Code Section 600, which forbids the offer of any government job "as consideration, favor or reward for any political activity" or "in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office."

If Sestak was offered a high government post to get out of the Pennsylvania race, it would appear an open-and-shut case that a felony was committed by someone high in the White House.

When CNN's John King suggested that such an offer "marches up into the gray area, perhaps the red area of a felony, it is a felony to induce somebody by offering them a job," White House adviser David Axelrod did not disagree with King: "If such things happened, they would constitute a serious breach of the law."

However, Axelrod assured King, "when the allegations were looked into, there is no evidence of such a thing."

And who looked into the allegation that a bribe was offered to Sestak and found "no evidence" of White House wrongdoing?

The White House counsel's office.

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Profits derived from your purchases
will help me to attend tea party rallies,
(especially the one in Las Vegas, on July 15-17)!