Here Comes Big Brother

Home Visiting Laws Threaten Parental Rights Nationwide

April 8, 2019

by Karen R. Effrem, MD

From The National Pulse

This story is bad news for freedom lovers in America. Here is the disturbing part:

"Any parent knows that there are a myriad of views on a whole range of parenting issues from discipline to if, how and when children are evaluated and treated for social, emotional issues when the screening instruments are admitted to be far from reliable. These differences are exacerbated by cultural differences among the many ethnic groups that may be receiving home visits."

Related information:
Iowa House Bill H.F. 272

Whom is Obama kidding? ~ By Joseph Farah

Yes, Americans want government out of our personal and private family lives. But government is ordained to protect innocent lives from being destroyed. And that's what happens every time an abortion takes place.

Obama doesn't care about the rights of women. He doesn't care about privacy. He doesn't care about "choice." And he doesn't care about or believe in the sanctity of human life.

In this column, Joseph Farah blasts Barack Obama's double-talk about "rights." When Obama says, "Government should not intrude on private family matters," as Joseph explains, it is obviously opposite of what Obama has done. Yes, actions speak much louder than words.

Whom is Obama kidding?

JOSEPH FARAH

By Joseph Farah

January 28, 2011 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2011

On the 38th anniversary of one of the worst Supreme Court rulings in the history of the Constitution and the American republic, Barack Obama expressed his firm support of Roe v. Wade and abortion on demand, saying, "Government should not intrude on private family matters."

Government should not intrude on private family matters?

Whom is this guy kidding?

Can we even count the ways Obama and his administration seek to intrude on private family matters?

• The hallmark legislation of his regime is Obamacare, a completely unconstitutional program that mandates individuals and families purchase government-approved health-care insurance. There is to be no "choice" in the matter. The government intrudes directly in the doctor-patient relationship, determining what is appropriate care and what is not. And, of course, Obama himself has stated unequivocally his preference is for a single-payer system in which government is ultimately responsible for all health-care decisions.

• Obama and his party approve of legislation that will eventually ban "choice" in what kind of light bulbs individuals and families can purchase.

• How about private family matters like personal finance? Obama not only wants to preserve a tax system that requires individuals and families to make all the details of their personal, private financial matters available to the government, he has sought to raise taxes on the most productive individuals because, after all, it's not really their money. It belongs to the government to redistribute as it sees fit.

• Obama seeks to monitor and regulate how much energy individuals and families use in their homes and offices.

• Obama wants individuals and families accountable to government on how they educate their children.

• Obama supports rewriting the laws of nature and nature's God in redefining what constitutes a family.

I could go on and on. This is not a matter of "privacy rights" for Obama. He doesn't believe in privacy rights.

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Hands off our children! ~ By Barbara Simpson

There is an ongoing search for Daniel Hauser, the 13 yr old with Hodgkins lymphoma, and his mother. That's a big story, but the bigger story that isn't being talked about, is if parents make a medical decision the "state" doesn't like, they lose custody. The "state" will soon be declaring parents unable to influence/teach their own children. read more | digg story

Constitutional Amendment to Protect Parental Rights

Wednesday, April 01, 2009 By Ryan Byrnes (CNSNews.com) - Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) and Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-MI) on Tuesday introduced a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at bolstering parental rights in the face of government intrusion. The Parental Rights Amendment, the latest in a series of similar proposals, would establish in the U.S. Constitution that parents – not government or any other organization – have “a fundamental right to raise their children as they see fit,” Hoekstra’s office said in a statement. “The Parental Rights Amendment would help stop the assault on parental rights, whether it is an assault from Congress, from the courts or the U.N.,” Hoekstra told CNSNews.com on Tuesday. “We’ve seen rights that have traditionally been reserved for parents being taken by schools and other institutions,” Hoekstra added. “That’s a mistake.” The Parental Rights Amendment is a response to both domestic and international actions that Hoekstra said have contributed to an erosion of family values. On the international side, Hoekstra mentioned a recent push to have the United States Senate ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. [Continue reading]

digg story ~ Submitted by MightyRighty

Parents? We don't need no stinkin' parents! - By Patrice Lewis

Our parental rights will become null and void under an upcoming treaty called the "U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child." What a relief that after 233 years of independence, the United States is voluntarily ceding its sovereignty to the U.N. Under international law, if this treaty is ratified, it overrides our state Constitutions. Oh, great!

read more | digg story