The Coming Chaos ~ Ep. 1351 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

From the Dan Bongino Show's description of this episode in his Show Notes (a.k.a. Newsletter!):

In this episode, I address the political chaos unfolding after the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The decision to post this episode was mostly based on the last few moments of this episode. Being that there are so many people subscribing to the Dan Bongino Show channels, both on youtube and Rumble, I am sure many have seen this episode.  So be it.  There are surely a few people out there, though, that haven't yet seen it.  This is for them, and there may be parts you may want to see again if you've already seen this episode 1351.

The fight is coming to our door, for sure. And though this episode came out just after the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett has been made now by the President, it is still important to know what kind of gaslighting the Demonicrats and their mainstream fake news allies will tell you while this is all going on. The word "gaslighting" is used, as they tend to ignore true history, you know, like it never happens like this. No, it has happened in this country's history, 29 times. Don't worry about a thing, Dan will explain it all to you in this episode.

In the last segment of this episode, I was very happy that Dan mentions the awesome appearance of Jim Caviezel on Fox & Friends Weekend, with Pete Hegseth asking Jim a question.  I am including that Fox & Friends segment that I found on youtube.com after I watched this episode.  It's only about 6 minutes long, and it will be a great bonus for you to see that.  

   

 Or, if you prefer, you can watch it on Rumble.com. 

(I know, Dan Bongino would rather that I use the Rumble.com video embedded here, but I'm a little nervous when it comes to using Rumble's java script embed code in my blogs, so that is why I'm still using the youtube embedded video of the episode so you can see it here on this page.) 

BONUS VIDEO:

Jim Caviezel On FOX and Friends Weekend -- What a Powerful Witness of Faith

   

Be sure to see the

SHOW NOTES for Episode 1351

Looking for news? The Bongino Report brings you the top conservative and libertarian news stories of the day, aggregated in an easy to read format to assist the public in getting accurate information.

Obama, Ginsburg, and the Ghost of Margaret Sanger

From American Thinker

Obama, Ginsburg, and the Ghost of Margaret Sanger August 22, 2009 By Miguel A. Guanipa From what surely must vie for the title of "Dingiest Gorge in Hell", the perdition bound soul of Margaret Sanger, posthumous Queen of the radical feminist movement, was unbeknownst summoned -- and just as quickly retired to the infernal pit where it likely makes its eternal home -- by a very artless and candid response from Supreme Court Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg, during a recent, hardly publicized, New York Times Magazine interview. Billed as a serious enquiry into the psyche of the esteemed judge, the interchange consisted primarily of a whole lot of tedious bewailing the female gene's perennial struggle against the oppressive, sexist culture that ostensibly permeates even moderately influential power structures in this country. At times, exposing this presumed, deep-seated, patriarchal impulse of the male species appeared to be the sole objective of the interview. And then, suddenly, and most unexpectedly, Mrs. Ginsburg yielded a rather frank assessment of the Pro-choice movement's little known history of eugenics. As civilized people who stumble upon an embarrassing truth and then try to regain their stoic composure, both the Judge and the unsuspecting enquirer continued undaunted on their merry way to discuss matters of more practical relevance, without even offering Justice Ginsburg's revealing observation nearly a parting glance. If for no other reason than to avoid being charged with having unfairly wrenched Mrs. Ginsburg's poorly "calibrated" remarks from their original context, I now present you with the extract, from what was declared by the publisher as an already condensed and edited version of the interview:

Q: If you were a lawyer again, what would you want to accomplish as a future feminist legal agenda? JUSTICE GINSBURG: Reproductive choice has to be straightened out. There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that had changed their abortion laws before Roe [to make abortion legal] are not going to change back. So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don't know why this hasn't been said more often. Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women? JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae - in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of. (Emphasis Mine)

[READ COMPLETE COLUMN]