Why is the Media Ducking the Biden Trainwreck? ~ Ep. 1197 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

Dan Bongino Show's description of Episode 1197 on his youtube channel:

In this episode, I discuss President Trump’s eye-opening comments last night about Joe Biden and I address the explosive scandal he was referring to. I also address the inside story of the Coronavirus response that the media is largely ignoring.

The Ukrainian Andrii Telizhenko, of Blue Star Strategies. Remember that name. That company was a lobbying firm that was trying to get U.S. lawmakers to make the Burisma Holdings investigations just kind of go away. Of course, that was while Joe Biden was still Vice President for Barack Obama, and Barack's point man for Ukraine, and Joe's son Hunter Biden just happened to have a board position at Burisma. And guess what, Senator Ron Johnson is subpoenaing some memos between Blue Star and Burisma. Oh, yes, Dan hits it out of the park in this segment.

The show started out with Dan providing a lot of information about the President's handling of the Coronavirus, Covid-19. Yes, it IS serious, but the important information that is needed out there is not being provided by the mainstream media. That would make the President look good, like he knows what he's doing, you know. The segment is right at the beginning of the video, so be sure to watch that.

Actually, the part of this episode that I really want people to see, is about Biden vs Bernie. Seriously, Bernie is NOT out of the race. Dan explains it a lot better than I could, so make sure you see that segment.  Just don't take Bernie lightly. And, there will be plenty of Demonicrats that will eventually realize that Joe Biden may not be able to even finish the campaign, and they will have to support Bernie.  It is kind of scary!



Seriously, folks, if you haven't already subscribed to Dan Bongino Show episodes and his newsletter, you have already missed out on a lot. Okay, you have the weekend to start getting caught up. Ready? Go. Get. Started. Now.

YouTube video: Clinton Body Count +5 in Just 6 Weeks

So, believe me, if you looked at each of the five recent deaths on a case by case basis, it would be difficult to definitively make any connection to Hillary Rodham Clinton, the 2016 Demonicrat nominee for President.  But when you see all of these cases together, you can begin to connect the dots for all these deaths that do have some suspicious circumstances, arousing our trepidation that something gruesomely evil is going on.

Now, with that being said, the "Clinton Body Count" has always been one of the reasons that I've been very apprehensive about either Bill or Hillary Clinton being in office. Wanting to keep Hillary out of the Oval Office has been my objective since the candidates started entering the race over a year ago. When the GOP candidates took the pledge in a debate a year ago to support who ever won the nomination - the pledge that some of those candidates have already broken - I also took that pledge. I pledged my support, not as a candidate, but as a citizen that utilizes my First Amendment rights by writing what I believe is the truth. In my eyes, I think that only by supporting Donald Trump as a unified party can we defeat the likes of Hillary Clinton.

While the "Clinton Body Count" has mostly involved some kind of connection to people and nefarious activities that could implicate the Clinton political power machine, there is another worry: What happens if that body count starts to include people that are merely reporting on the various conspiracy theories involving the Clintons?

Video published on August 5, 2016 by TRUTHstreammedia

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

VIDEO: Sen. Rand Paul calls out DNC Chairwoman on abortion

Late last week, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) called out DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz on abortion.April 17, 2015...

Posted by Johnny2k's America on Thursday, April 23, 2015

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

VIDEO: It's time to stop the hubris... (AFTER you see this video!)

Post by Johnny2k's America.

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

DNC chair: 'We're going to hold the Senate'

Noting close poll numbers in crucial states, she said the Democratic Party's advantages are "superior to the ones that Republicans have."

"When we keep races this close, Democrats win," said Wasserman Schultz.

The upbeat assessment stood in stark contrast to the conclusions drawn by Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus during the same segment.

"Our ground game is whipping their ground game," Priebus said, adding later, "We're going to have a great night."

As written by Conservative Intel on November 3, 2014, "Democrat National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz apparently has no problem waxing quixotic in public pronouncements."

Sure, it is totally okay to denigrate Debbie, she seems to earn the Crazy Lady In the Attic Award for her extremely absurd statement. What was she thinking? Is she not paying attention to any of the polls?  Is she getting desperate because she's trying to save her job?

However, in Conservative Intel, where I first heard about this story, the people that commented on the story have a different theory.  It seems quite cynical in their thinking that there's something sinister going on.

Lewis Clements Sr.:

I am sad to say MS.Debbie Wasserman Schultz is right, "When we keep races this close, Democrats win." Their Voter Fraud always seems to overcome a one to two point lead. BY Hook or Crook!

Barbara Carpenter:

I guess she has an inside track on the voter fraud the Dems continue to perpetrate.

Jeffrey Raum · Atlanta, Georgia:

Democrats will win if the electronic voting machines are allowed! Lie, Cheat, and Steal has always been the Democratic motto! It worked in 2012, with votes being change from R to D on machines in several states. Now it has already showed up in early voting! Why is it these calibration errors only changes Republican vote to Democrat, never the other way around?
Why do you think Obama was taunting the American public about any vote for a Democrat was a vote for his policies? They know it's rigged, and there is nothing that will be done about it!

I am a just a little bit skeptical about the theory that the Democrats will steal the election. Wouldn't that be rather obvious if it actually happened? The polls and pundits seem to indicate a large landslide for the Republicans in this midterm election.

Well... whatever.   But if Debbie Whatshername ends up being right, and all of the close races do end up going in the Democrat direction, there will be a great amount of suspicion, if not downright anger across the country. That wouldn't be why DHS beefed up security at federal facilities last week, would it? Just sayin'...

RELATED STORIES:

• October 31, 2014 ~ VIDEO: Hmmm..... What's this about?

• October 31, 2014 ~ VIDEO: The reason for beefing up the security at fed facilities?

*    *    *    *

DNC chair: 'We're going to hold the Senate'

By Elise Viebeck

November 2, 2014

From THE HILL

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) predicted Sunday that her party would hold the Senate in Tuesday's midterm elections, thanks to its "superior" ground games in critical states.

"I think we're going to hold the Senate," Wasserman Schultz said during an interview with ABC's "This Week." "We have a ground game that I know [the GOP] would take over theirs any day of the week."

Wassermann Schultz also cited the high-level surrogates working with Democratic candidates on the campaign trail, including former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vice President Biden.

~~~ READ MORE on THE HILL ~~~

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

VIDEO: GOP, tell them the difference between Republicans and Democrats!

Post by Johnny2k's America.

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

David Axelrod's pattern of sexual misbehavior ~ By Ann Coulter

In this column, Ann Coulter makes a concluding statement that just may say it all:

This time, Obama's little helpers have not only thrown a bomb into the Republican primary, but are hoping to destroy the man who deprives the Democrats of their only argument in 2012: If you oppose Obama, you must be a racist.

One of the things I had asked in a recent post here was, who would be responsible for this horrid character assassination of Herman Cain?

After Herman Cain's excellent press conference today, there was a conversation on "The Five" (Fox News), where a debate came up about who is responsible for the attacks on Herman Cain. Could it have been the DNC because Obama is afraid to face Cain? Could it have been other campaigns running for the Republican nomination? Could it be the media? Or, how about Cain's own staff in order to get him more face time?

And that would be totally absurd for anyone to hold Cain's own staff to be responsible, but I had to say it to reflect on the absurdity of the media to make their suggestions that it was anyone else but the Democrats!

Ann seems to answer the question here by showing the motive and opportunity for the Democrats being responsible for getting this story about the harassment allegations started. And this also provides me with information that makes me even more confident that the sexual allegations against Herman Cain are completely untrue. It's almost as if the Democrats, assuming they are responsible, have a lynch mob mentality. I'm just sayin'...

RELATED COLUMN:
Why the Establishment Wants to Destroy Herman Cain ~ By Dr. Alveda King

*     *     *     *

David Axelrod's pattern of sexual misbehavior

ANN COULTER

By Ann Coulter

November 09, 2011 ~ 5:05 pm Eastern

© 2011

Herman Cain has spent his life living and working all over the country – Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, Washington, D.C. – but never in Chicago.

So it's curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago: home of the Daley machine and Obama consigliere David Axelrod.

Suspicions had already fallen on Sheila O'Grady, who is close with David Axelrod and went straight from being former Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley's chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association (IRA), as being the person who dug up Herman Cain's personnel records from the National Restaurant Association (NRA).

The Daley-controlled IRA works hand-in-glove with the NRA. And strangely enough, Cain's short, three-year tenure at the NRA is evidently the only period in his decades-long career during which he's alleged to have been a sexual predator.

After O'Grady's name surfaced in connection with the miraculous appearance of Cain's personnel files from the NRA, she issued a Clintonesque denial of any involvement in producing them – by vigorously denying that she knew Cain when he was at the NRA. (Duh.)

And now, after a week of conservative eye-rolling over unspecified, anonymous accusations against Cain, we've suddenly got very specific sexual assault allegations from an all-new accuser out of ... Chicago.

READ MORE on WND.com

American media doing a 'hatchet job' on me ~ By Herman Cain

This has definitely been a difficult week for Herman Cain, and for his supporters. Allegations of sexual harassment don't look good, even when they may not be true. If they were true, it would make Herman Cain look pretty slimy. However, even if they are not true, it would make Herman Cain look pretty slimy, at least to those that do not know him.

After Herman Cain's excellent press conference today, there was a conversation on "The Five" (Fox News), where a debate came up about who is responsible for the attacks on Herman Cain. Could it have been the DNC because Obama is afraid to face Cain? Could it have been other campaigns running for the Republican nomination? Could it be the media? Or, how about Cain's own staff in order to get him more face time?

Well, at any rate, it really doesn't matter, does it? I think Herman Cain is making it absolutely clear that he is staying in the race.

And I could do without this kind of politics of character assassination without facts, but a whole lot of innuendo. Cheap campaign tricks do not impress me, folks. Like Herman says, how about just staying focused on what our problems are in this country, and how to solve them! I'm just sayin'...

*     *     *     *

American media doing a 'hatchet job' on me

HERMAN CAIN

By Herman Cain

November 06, 2011 ~ 4:24 pm Eastern

© 2011

I am a serious person, seeking the opportunity to do a serious and very important job. Our nation has very serious problems, particularly of an economic nature, and Barack Obama does not have the skill, knowledge or will to solve them.

I do.

Unfortunately, the media-driven process by which one must seek this opportunity is fundamentally unserious. I have touched on this before – the emphasis on "gaffes," gotcha questions and time devoted to trivial nonsense – and everyone knows the process only became further detached from relevance this week as the media published anonymous, ancient, vague personal allegations against me.

Once this kind of nonsense starts, the media's rules say you have to act in a certain way. I am well aware of these rules. And I refuse to play by them.

There are several reasons for this. One is that, lest anyone forget, we actually have serious matters to talk about. Since the media went bananas over this so-called story, my schedule has not changed in the slightest. I have continued to make all planned public appearances. I have continued to answer questions about my 9-9-9 tax reform plan. I have continued to do everything else that our strategy prescribes.

READ MORE on WND.com

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

Newt is not the answer in 2012 ~ By Joseph Farah

I liked Newt Gingrich at one time, back when he was the leader of the Republican Revolution in 1994. But I agree with Joseph. Newt isn't the guy that we would want as President, especially now. Because of the commercial he did with Nancy Pelosi, which you will see below, I hope that NO Republican of a Right mind would ever consider him - even as a dog-catcher. Just sayin'...

America needs real change today, and that does not mean looking backward for yesterday's failed leadership.

I believe we have better candidates who may not be as well known as Gingrich.

It's time to start talking about them.

I've given you an example of one ticket I like. It is certainly not the only one. But I wanted to illustrate that there are good people available in 2012.

It's just that none of them are named Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney.

By Joseph Farah

Posted: May 24, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

Newt Gingrich is out there campaigning for the presidency in 2012 with a new book, "To Save America: Stopping Obama's Secular-Socialist Machine."

I won't tell you I read the book.

I don't feel I need to do so after reviewing Gingrich's political career through the 1990s.

It's not that Gingrich isn't smart. He is.

Gingrich had his moment. He did an amazing job in 1994 leading the "Republican Revolution" and becoming speaker of the House.

But Gingrich lost his way during the Clinton years. He became part of the problem. Do I really need to remind Americans he resigned the speakership in moral disgrace?

I was among the first to call for his resignation then. I sure don't think he's the right man to succeed Obama when we need a radical approach to reversing unconstitutional initiatives and policies.

Gingrich was a revolutionary until he got power. Then he became the politician, again. Ask most members of the freshman class of 1994 who betrayed the "Republican Revolution" and they will tell you Gingrich did.

He sold out his principles. He accommodated. He appeased. He fought harder to get in the front of Air Force One to chat with the president than he did to subvert that president's agenda.

Now we're to believe Newt is the fiery revolutionary, once again.

I'm sorry, I don't buy it.

Everything Gingrich says about Barack Obama's administration is true. But he's really a Johnny-come-lately to the party.

For instance, his battle plan calls for stopping the energy tax. That would be cap and trade – Obama's answer to the phantom problem of climate change.

But, not long ago, Gingrich was helping Nancy Pelosi and others sell climate change to the American people. In case you forgot, I invite you to watch the happy couple in the TV commercial on this subject:

Nancy Pelosi and Newt Gingrich Agree on Climate Change

Video provided by WeCanSolveIt

Do you really expect President Gingrich will fight to stop cap and trade after serving as an advocate of the phony climate-change scenario?

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Profits derived from your purchases
will help me to attend tea party rallies,
(especially the one in Las Vegas, on July 15-17)!

Don't cry for me, Arizona ~ By Burt Prelutsky

Burt reflects the opinion of many people across this land that support the new Arizona immigration law. In this column, he goes after the critics of the law that seem to be able to say whatever they want to, many of them that use race-baiting, hypocrisy, and lies about what the law does.

In my opinion, it should be a criminal act for anyone to compare the new law in Arizona in any way, shape or form to what took place in Nazi Germany. Hitler, in case it slipped your mind, was arresting, torturing and murdering Germans for no other reason than that they were Jews, Catholics, gypsies, invalids and homosexuals. Members of the Gestapo weren't simply asking to look at green cards and sending non-citizens back to Poland, France and Holland. They were sending them to Auschwitz.

Ironically, Article 67 of Mexico's Immigration Law states: "Authorities, whether federal, state or municipal, are required to demand that foreigners prove their legal presence in the country." In spite of which, President Calderon had the gall to compare our border fence to the Berlin Wall. Nobody bothered pointing out to the jackass that there's a world of difference between building a barrier to keep illegal aliens out and erecting one to prevent one's own citizens from escaping.

By Burt Prelutsky

Posted: May 07, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

When you're a right-winger living in California, you tend to envy people who live elsewhere. For a long time, I've envied Texans. For one thing, judging by my e-mail, most of my biggest fans seem to live in the Lone Star State. But, also, aside from an occasional cretin like Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, Texans seem to elect more than their share of stalwart conservatives.

Another state I came to admire was Oklahoma. That was after discovering that it was the only state in the Union in which Obama failed to carry a single county in 2008.

Now, of course, I've lost my heart to Arizona. At last, a state has sounded the alarm about illegal aliens. Sure it was a long time coming, but at least Gov. Jan Brewer and the Arizona Legislature have finally stood up for the law of the land. Even John McCain, who has spent years sounding like an immigration lawyer, jumped aboard the bandwagon.

On the other side, we have virtually every hack politician with a Hispanic last name ready and eager to display his ignorance, bigotry and lack of patriotism. I mean, really, is there an uglier, more disgusting sight than a bunch of dunderheads complaining about racial profiling when their own actions and statements are based solely on race?

Arizona has been overrun by at least half a million illegals who have placed unbearable burdens on its schools, hospitals and emergency rooms. They have made Phoenix the kidnap capital of North America and turned its countryside into an open sewer for drug smugglers. It took the cold-blooded murder of an elderly rancher before the good folks of Arizona said, enough is enough.

We keep hearing the same stale propaganda that these sneaks are the people who'll do the jobs gringos won't. Well, I have a news flash: With unemployment hovering at 10 percent, if those jobs ever existed in the past, they don't exist today. Besides, why should they get the jobs that could go to people waiting patiently for their names to be called in Ghana, Poland and Vietnam?

The only people who oppose Arizona's new law – a law based, by the way, on our own federal law – are members of the Catholic Church hierarchy who are anxious to fill church pews; drug lords who want to maintain a steady flow of product, users and salesmen; President Calderon, who wants those American dollars to continue flowing south to keep the Mexican economy afloat; American politicians with names like Hernandez and Gomez, who want to increase their power base; and punks like Mayor Gavin Newsome who represent places as left and loony as San Francisco. We shouldn't overlook the DNC, an organization so corrupt that Mafia dons attend their seminars to pick up tips from the likes of James Carville and Rahm Emanuel.

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Profits derived from your purchases
will help me to attend tea party rallies!

GOP: It's sink or swim in 2010 ~ By J. Matt Barber

Commentary from WorldNetDaily

By J. Matt Barber Posted: January 15, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern © 2010 Pop quiz: Kyle and Christina – casual acquaintances fresh out of college – are interviewing for the same job. It's a position each desperately wants and needs, so competition is intense. While waiting in the lobby, Christina offers Kyle a bit of advice: "Kyle, when you sit down, the first thing you should do is tell Ms. Flumptard that you can't wait to work for such a smokin' hot boss; and be sure to mention that, while in college, you regularly used pot. Oh, and tell her that, from time-to-time, office supplies will make their way home with you. She'll appreciate your candor." Kyle follows Christina's advice. Kyle is: a) likely to get the gig because "flattery will get you everywhere"; b) to be admired for his courage and honesty; c) a liberal; d) a bumbling dolt; e) both c and d. (Bear with me. This is going somewhere.) Now try this one: Republicans and Democrats are applying for the same job. Leadership is something they both desperately want and need, so competition is intense. Tim Kaine, chairman of the Democratic National Committee has a bit of advice for his Republican counterparts. He suggests that, to succeed, Republicans should run "moderate" candidates, kick conservatives to the curb and offer voters "Democrat Lite" instead of Reagan Republicanism in 2010 (you know, kind of like in '08 with John McCain). In a statement addressing the ouster of liberal Florida Republican Chairman Jim Greer, Kaine fretted aloud – genuinely, no doubt: "[T]he GOP's biggest liability this year will be its right wing that sees November's elections as an opportunity to purify the Party – at any cost." Kaine warned that the "unrelenting drive towards a smaller, narrower Republican Party" would "cost the GOP dearly." (Thanks for the heads-up, Timmy. How thoughtful.) He further lamented that conservatives have begun a "quest to purify the Republican Party, eliminate moderate voices (read: liberal voices) and enact an extreme right-wing agenda (read: conservative agenda)." Republicans should, therefore: a) follow Democrat Kaine's advice and drive the GOP further leftward; b) ignore Kaine altogether; c) do exactly the opposite of what this crocodile-teared partisan hack suggests, moving – post haste – to "purify the Republican Party, eliminate [liberal] voices and enact a [conservative] agenda." If you answered "b" and "c," then Cornhusker Kickbacks to you. To both take and implement the advice of those who seek your political destruction is a fool's errand. In many states, such as New York, Florida and elsewhere, the Republican establishment seems to get that. They're responding wisely to an unprecedented grass-roots groundswell (a "tea party," if you will) that demands both a return to the GOP's conservative roots and adherence to the Party platform. READ FULL STORY >

Obama's eligibility baggage just a coincidence? ~ By Marylou Barry

From WorldNetDaily

Posted: September 17, 2009 ~ 1:00 am Eastern By Marylou Barry © 2009 Recent revelations make it increasingly likely that the Democratic National Committee was aware of Barack Obama's eligibility problems before certifying his nomination for president. But has anyone considered that perhaps the choice of a compromised candidate for that office was not accidental but deliberate? "In politics there are no accidents," Franklin Delano Roosevelt once said. "If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." Sorry to sound conspiratorial, but like most voters I've never been invited into the proverbial "smoke-filled rooms" where nominations actually take place, so I can only speculate as to what occurs behind the scenes. With so much for so many depending on four years of American foreign policy, though, I sure have trouble believing nominations actually originate in the DNC or RNC. If they did, surely another smooth-spoken, left-leaning, Islam-supporting, black Democrat could have been found to sub for the eligibility-impaired community organizer from Chicago. This should have been the obvious path for the DNC – or whatever shadow entity it is that controls nominations of the two major parties. Why wasn't it? To answer that question, I hearken back to a 2007 article by columnist, terrorism researcher and Vietnam War veteran Patrick Briley. Briley's article, entitled "Using Terrorists to Establish World Government," calls into question the actions of not just Democratic but also Republican higher-ups, including George W. Bush, in pandering to Islamic interests. Apparently, both Anglo globalist politicians and Muslim power brokers want world government and differ only as to which of their two groups should be at the top of the pecking order. In the symbiotic relationship that ensues, each side imagines it is using the other to achieve its goals. But in the final analysis, only one side will be able to prevail. [CLICK HERE TO READ MORE] [DIGG STORY]

Hunting donkeys ~ By Doug Powers

By Doug Powers Posted: July 06, 2009 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 Sarah Palin added to the weekend fireworks by announcing on July 3 that she'd be resigning as Alaska governor effective in about three weeks. I know what you're thinking: "South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford is busted with a Venezuelan mistress, and Sarah Palin resigns?" Those looking to Palin's resignation as a signal of some sort of as yet to be exposed "wrongdoing" on her part don't know politics. In politics, the guilty are the ones who stick around – that's why we're in so much trouble. After Palin's announcement on Friday, the rumor mill began buzzing even louder than usual. Theories ranging from claims that Palin is about to be charged with embezzlement, to she's pregnant again, to she's running for president, to my own theory that Palin quit to become the host of her own game show called "You Bet'cha Life!" There were also the expected tasteless jokes about her kids under the guise of "satire." One of these sensitive, caring liberals wrote that Palin is "the first politician to actually try to increase the population of retarded people." And all along I thought that was ACORN's job. Predictably, those who seem to have devoted their lives to being Sarah Palin's sworn enemies were, in exceedingly generous gestures, the first out of the gate to offer Palin post-resignation career advice. [CONTINUE READING]

Steele is No Token - By Kevin Jackson

By Kevin Jackson at The Black Sphere

I am a huge Michael Steele fan, and I echo Michelle Obama "patriotic" comment that, "…for the first time in my adult life, I am proud to be an American". Just kidding. I have been a proud American since birth, and I see no real story about Michael Steele being the first Black head of the RNC, unless we are talking about the anecdote in history. Steele is eminently qualified to run the RNC. He is an ex-Lieutenant Governor, politically astute, smart, good-looking, articulate…and of course clean. But the mainstream media will spin this as "Republicans finally break with their racist past and elect Steele." Or something like that. [Continue reading at The Black Sphere]

digg story, submitted by RedOctober007

The end of the constitutional republic? - by Alan Keyes

Alan Keyes explains the current Obama constitutional crisis very well. Should popularity supersede the constitution? Every elected official across the board is sworn to uphold the constitution including the electors. This is a must read by everyone and especially for those in the Office of the President Elect and the DNC.

read more | digg story

What I Saw At the Discombobulation - by Michelle Malkin

Michell Malkin writes her column from DENVER:

Never was so much hype created by so few to simulate the appearance of so many. The hard-core left vowed to turn out 50,000 protesters for the Democratic National Convention this week. They pledged to "Re-create '68" and cause the kind of tear-gas-infused revolutionary havoc that marked the DNC in Chicago four decades ago. Police prepared for the worst riots. Media from around the world anticipated the best pictures. But when rhetorical push came to real-life shove, the nostalgic, Marx-adoring organizers of Re-create '68 seem to have mustered no more than, oh, 68 bodies. Their presence here is dwarfed by the massive show of police, press and camera-toting looky-loos. You can't take a picture without someone else taking pictures of everyone else taking pictures of not much else getting in your frame.

read more | digg story