Ted Cruz: The Democratic party is defined by Trump hatred ~ Fox News | Video

The subtitle should be: Demonicrats Can't Get Their Act Together In Iowa. It's embarrassing, and I guess I could say, it sucks to be them. We still don't know who won the Iowa Caucus nearly 24 hours later! Not a good start for the Democrat Party in this election cycle.

And then, Fox & Friends asked Senator Cruz about the "shampeachment" and how that would affect the Demonicrats next November. Asked who the Senator thought that Rep. Adam "Shifty" Schiff was swaying with his ignorant closing remarks, Ted Cruz says, "Nobody..." That should tell us something right there!

Of course, the final thoughts were about tonight's State of the Union address from President Donald J. Trump. Sen. Cruz suggested that the President should stay on a very positive note tonight, about accomplishments with trade and a booming economy, moving the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and military victories, and stay away from the politics of the impeachment, even though the U.S. Senate will exonerate the President tomorrow in the vote.

Meanwhile, a side note, it has been reported that Rush Limbaugh will be at the State of the Union tonight. From Simon Conway in a tweet: "We also found out that as soon as next week @POTUS will present Rush with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Completely deserved! Prayers for Rush and his family."

Brian Williams: The Palace Guard ~ By Joseph Farah

This was a warning shot by Williams to Boehner: It was a signal that you better not mess with this issue of eligibility. You can have fun with health care. You can argue about taxes. You can read the Constitution all day long in the House. But just don't actually take the Constitution seriously when it comes to Article 2, Section 1.

Joseph Farah discusses the attitude of the mainstream media about Barack Hussein Obama's Constitutional eligibility, and what they expect from Speaker of the House John Boehner when it comes to that subject, as made clear by Brian Williams, the "Palace Guard," but not clearly a true journalist. As Joseph mentions here:

I've been in the news business for more than 30 years. What have I learned in that time?

Lesson No. 1: "Politicians lie."

Lesson No. 2: "Politicians cover up their lies and mistakes."

Apparently Brian Williams never learned this lesson. The only alternative conclusion is that he reveres Barack Obama so much that he is willing to serve as an unofficial member of his palace guard, betraying his professional duty as a journalistic watchdog on the high and mighty.

Brian Williams: The Palace Guard

JOSEPH FARAH

By Joseph Farah

January 08, 2011 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2011

With at least 58 percent of the American public now questioning Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as president – and still only getting ridiculed by the major media – some are turning to civil disobedience in one form or another.

Thursday, a passionate young woman who has been demonstrating outside the White House for months about the issue interrupted the reading of the Constitution in the House of Representatives when a member got to Article 2, Section 1, which lays out presidential eligibility requirements.

"Except Obama!" she shouted. "Except Obama! Help us Jesus!"

Meanwhile, a distinguished Army surgeon, Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, is serving a prison sentence for simply asking for proof of Obama's eligibility before being deployed to a foreign war, again, under his command.

Attorneys who have brought lawsuits demanding proof Obama is a "natural born citizen" as the Constitution requires have been fined for following the legal remedies. Several U.S. citizens who have brought lawsuits have been told they don't have legal standing to challenge the president. The handful of journalists who have pressed the issue have been caricatured as conspiracy theorists because they simply want to see the documentation that will prove Obama eligible or ineligible.

Then along comes Brian Williams of NBC News on Thursday.

Evidently, Williams sees his position as a member of the White House palace guard.

In an interview with new House Speaker John Boehner, he showed no concern for the majority opinion of Americans – only concern for protecting Barack Obama's birth secrets. And well he should since he is a part of the media establishment that failed miserably in getting answers to these fundamental questions of American governance through journalistic malfeasance.

Now, Williams and his colleagues in the establishment press have a vested interest in stonewalling on Obama's secrets – almost as much as Obama himself does.

Can you imagine how much egg will be required to cover the faces of the entire media elite if and when Obama's dirty little secrets are unveiled publicly?

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Newt is not the answer in 2012 ~ By Joseph Farah

I liked Newt Gingrich at one time, back when he was the leader of the Republican Revolution in 1994. But I agree with Joseph. Newt isn't the guy that we would want as President, especially now. Because of the commercial he did with Nancy Pelosi, which you will see below, I hope that NO Republican of a Right mind would ever consider him - even as a dog-catcher. Just sayin'...

America needs real change today, and that does not mean looking backward for yesterday's failed leadership.

I believe we have better candidates who may not be as well known as Gingrich.

It's time to start talking about them.

I've given you an example of one ticket I like. It is certainly not the only one. But I wanted to illustrate that there are good people available in 2012.

It's just that none of them are named Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney.

By Joseph Farah

Posted: May 24, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

Newt Gingrich is out there campaigning for the presidency in 2012 with a new book, "To Save America: Stopping Obama's Secular-Socialist Machine."

I won't tell you I read the book.

I don't feel I need to do so after reviewing Gingrich's political career through the 1990s.

It's not that Gingrich isn't smart. He is.

Gingrich had his moment. He did an amazing job in 1994 leading the "Republican Revolution" and becoming speaker of the House.

But Gingrich lost his way during the Clinton years. He became part of the problem. Do I really need to remind Americans he resigned the speakership in moral disgrace?

I was among the first to call for his resignation then. I sure don't think he's the right man to succeed Obama when we need a radical approach to reversing unconstitutional initiatives and policies.

Gingrich was a revolutionary until he got power. Then he became the politician, again. Ask most members of the freshman class of 1994 who betrayed the "Republican Revolution" and they will tell you Gingrich did.

He sold out his principles. He accommodated. He appeased. He fought harder to get in the front of Air Force One to chat with the president than he did to subvert that president's agenda.

Now we're to believe Newt is the fiery revolutionary, once again.

I'm sorry, I don't buy it.

Everything Gingrich says about Barack Obama's administration is true. But he's really a Johnny-come-lately to the party.

For instance, his battle plan calls for stopping the energy tax. That would be cap and trade – Obama's answer to the phantom problem of climate change.

But, not long ago, Gingrich was helping Nancy Pelosi and others sell climate change to the American people. In case you forgot, I invite you to watch the happy couple in the TV commercial on this subject:

Nancy Pelosi and Newt Gingrich Agree on Climate Change

Video provided by WeCanSolveIt

Do you really expect President Gingrich will fight to stop cap and trade after serving as an advocate of the phony climate-change scenario?

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Profits derived from your purchases
will help me to attend tea party rallies,
(especially the one in Las Vegas, on July 15-17)!

Please don't resign, Nancy! ~ By Joseph Farah

Posted: May 19, 2009 © 2009 By Joseph Farah I disagree with those calling for Nancy Pelosi to resign as speaker of the House. I want her to stay right where she is – the poster girl for Democratic Party dishonesty, duplicity, hypocrisy, vacillation, finger-pointing and the inability to distinguish right from wrong. Really. Why would anyone who wants to see the Congress turned upside-down in 2010 want Nancy Pelosi to step down? It doesn't make sense. I want her to stay where she is until the next election. I want Harry Reid to stay where he is in the Senate. I want Barney Frank to get as much face time as possible and continue in his leadership role for the majority. Don't dump Nancy, please! Just think of the opportunities she presents for challengers in 2010. I can envision her very name working its way into the permanent political lexicon of the nation. In the future, when someone tries to say one thing and do another or backpedal from previous policies or have his cake and eat it too, we can just respond simply: "Don't you Pelosi your way through this one …" Her name may well find its way into dictionaries in the future: "Pelosi – verb – to argue a point while ignoring relevant facts and defying logic and reason." Headed into the 2010 elections, I love the idea of having a Democratic House speaker who is a known fraud – someone who represents herself as being opposed to waterboarding terrorists captured on the battlefield, but who never lifted a finger to stop it despite being in her position of power for three years. She may have trouble holding her own congressional seat with a record like that. I wouldn't be surprised if Cindy Sheehan takes her out in a primary. At the end of the day, Americans appreciate politicians who mean what they say and say what they mean. They appreciate politicians who stand on principles and don't waffle. They appreciate politicians who don't lie as a way of life. [Continue reading]

digg story ~ Submitted by lookingforHim