Explosive New Emails Surface ~ Ep. 1369 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

From the Dan Bongino Show's description of this episode in his Show Notes (a.k.a. Newsletter!):

In this episode, I discuss the explosive new revelations about Joe Biden’s foreign corruption. This will shake and rattle the campaign. I also discuss a shameless assault by The NY Times on the election.

If you haven't voted yet, and you are still not decided on who to vote for yet, this is going to be an episode that you will want to see.  

The story about Hunter Biden's dealings in Ukraine have been around for awhile.  Some people called them wild conspiracy theories, even though there is a video with Joe Biden bragging to some folks at a Conference on Foreign Relations forum about pressure he put on Ukraine to fire a prosecutor looking in on Burisma activities that may have been criminal in nature.  Joe Biden's son Hunter was getting paid quite a bit to be on the Board of Directors of Burisma, even though he had no experience in energy or anything else that would have made him qualified for that position.  That position was given to him around 2014, while his father Joe was Barack Obama's Vice President.  Well, gawleee, maybe having a dad in a high position like that has it's fringe benefits?  

Forget for a moment that sounds really shady.  Oh, wait...  Never mind.  It does sound really corrupt.  And in the last two days, the New York Post published a two part story about it (click here for first installment on 10/14/20), with physical proof found on a laptop computer apparently belonging to Hunter Biden, with some very damning evidence on it.  Dan discusses the first part of the story which came out yesterday (Wednesday), and how the mainstream media is trying to keep the story from becoming too wide spread.  Oh, no, too late.

In the rest of the episode, Dan shows a little about how Judge Amy Coney Barrett is doing in the Senate confirmation hearings, totally running circles around some of the Demonicrat Senators with her very sound intellectual abilities.  And following that segment in the show, Dan crushes it on his commentary about an article in the New York Times by Davey Alba, who tries to blame Conservatives for violence that is threatened by left wingers following the election, a "street fight."

That's all I have for now.  Enjoy the show!

 

I know, Dan Bongino would prefer that I embed the Rumble.com video here. However, I'm a little hesitant when it comes to using Rumble's java script embedding code in my blogs, so that is why I'm still using the YouTube embedded video of the episode so you can see it here on this page. That being said, here is the link to the video of this episode so that you can watch it on Rumble.com.  

Be sure to see the SHOW NOTES for Episode 1369 for related news stories.    

Looking for news? The Bongino Report brings you the top conservative and libertarian news stories of the day, aggregated in an easy to read format to assist the public in getting accurate information.

The Battle Lines Have Been Drawn ~ Ep. 1269 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

From the Dan Bongino Show's description of this episode on youtube.com/Bongino or in his Show Notes:

In this episode I address the insane “defund the police movement” and I debunk liberal myths about policing which are being used to fuel rage. I also address the inside story of the NYPD chaos and the Secret Service’s political fights.

So, there is this little piece of advice that Dan Bongino has for those out there that want to defund the police.  This is being discussed in liberal cities, like in Minneapolis, Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York.  And it isn't just stopping at defunding the police. In Minneapolis, they actually voted to dismantle the police force.  I really think that they should reconsider that proposal.  Doing away with the police force is not going to lead to any great civilization with no crime.  Actually, it would have the exact opposite affect.  Yep, just my personal opinion, based on what I know is true.  There are still unbelievably evil sociopathic people out there, and without any type of law enforcement, it would be total chaos and anarchy. 

There are three big reasons for having plenty of very well trained law enforcement officers:  The police are there to possibly prevent crimes when possible, stop crimes while they are occurring, and investigating crimes that have already occurred.   In this post, I want to focus on explaining and exploring each of those elements, which should help people understand why defunding the police is a really horrible idea. 

In the case of crime prevention, there's a thing called deterrence.  I'm sorry, but anybody that thinks that the criminal thinks about what happens if they get caught, prosecuted and found guilty, and incarcerated, is a deterrent, I would have to say they are wrong.  I know that seems hard to believe.  I couldn't even fathom the thought of being locked up in a cell, for any amount of time.  Of course, now, people are being let OUT of jail because of the Wuhan Coronavirus, so even the thought of incarceration isn't going to deter many of the hardened criminals.  The REAL deterrent to keep a crime from occurring is a police presence.   Police patrols in the squad cars, plainly marked and obvious to the criminals, and even the walking beat patrols, DO deter crime.  Defunding the police would greatly reduce the manpower needed for this element of fighting crime:  Prevention by deterrence.

The next element is very critical to your safety in this world.  Being able to call 911 when a crime is being committed, and having officers arrive soon enough to possibly save your life, would be very beneficial for your health and safety.  Of course, they can't always get to you in time, but they will try their hardest:  Lights, sirens and the whole nine yards.  But throw in a huge manpower shortage, and large gaps in coverage, and you're going to have a very serious problem.  Sadly, there are areas that would see much less coverage than is needed, and that would be in the rougher neighborhoods.  They would suffer the most.   Like Dan talks about in this episode, the police come to emergencies sometimes just to protect the fire fighters and/or the EMTs.  And who is going to direct traffic in the case of accidents on the freeway, to keep everybody safe, including you?

Finally, there is the third element for the need for plenty of funding for the police.  It always seems to be a problem when a crime has been committed, and that hopefully somebody will investigate it.  That could be you, someday:  Wanting justice for a crime that hurts you or a loved one.  Now think about it, if police departments are defunded, and they don't have the personnel to investigate, you'll be left in the dark, with no recourse (except for being a real life Charles Bronson "Death Wish" vigilantes, which you DON'T want!).   Of course, with a lack of funding, and many officers leaving the police departments, you then lose the experienced officers you would want as investigators.  There is only so much they can do.  And yet, you will still want the crime solved, and not become a cold crime.  But no, your police department was defunded, and all the good investigators went elsewhere. 

Now, when I was watching this episode, I heard Dan say that when a crime is being committed, "Who are you going to call, Ghost Busters?"  That hit me on two different levels.  First of all, that is the perfect description of the ignorance of the Liberals, and tells you how little they have thought through their suggestion that the police can be defunded or eliminated.  But the second level, one that I care about, and might mean nothing to you, is my question in the back of my mind:  Is Dan Bongino reading my blogs or tweets?  Just wondering.  I'd be honored if he was.

Please watch this episode if you haven't already.  Let me know if you think I am right, which you can do by sharing the link and tweet(s) I do to promote this wonderful episode.  Thank you, Dan Bongino, for all that you do, and have done in law enforcement.

SHOW NOTES for Episode 1269

• Why Socialism Sucks. An Interview with Dinesh D’Souza ~ Ep. 1268 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

Don’t Fall For The Trap Coming ~ Ep. 1226 ~ The Dan Bongino Show®

From the Bongino Show's description of this episode on youtube.com/Bongino or in his Show Notes:

In this episode, I address the stunning, new, declassified information which will have John Brennan in a panic. I also address new information about the troubling origins of the Wuhan Virus. Finally, I address The NY Times attempts to rewrite their own story about troubling allegations against Joe Biden.

More than ever, I know I need to keep chatting about this show and sharing it here.  I do not think that a lot of this information would be available if you didn't know where to look.  What the Deep State and the people of the Swamp were doing to stay in power, and then what they did when they lost power, is troubling.  I thank God that we have Dan to explain it all to us!

And of course, there has to be another good example of retconning, not to mention having different standards for Republicans and Demonicrats for deviant behavior.  The New York Times was caught red-handed in changing a story about Joe Biden.  It's a definite bagel baker.  I suggest social distancing yourself from the legacy fake news, it's totally gross.

I'll take you right to the really good news in this episode here.  I am sure that one of the reasons that our President is loved by so many patriots is because he shows that good positive attitude, that things are going to be better, soon! He knows that the fabric of this great country is made up of men and women that have the "can do" abilities and work ethic to turn things back around. President Trump understands how devastating the Wuhan Virus Pandemic of 2020 has been, not just for the tragic loss of lives and illness we've experienced, but also the serious devastation of our economy in a very short amount of time.  I truly believe that he will help us regain the hope and inspiration, and that yes, WE WILL BUILD IT AGAIN!  President Trump, you're right, and we will get 'er done.

Some of Dan's News Picks from the Show Notes:

• The fake news NY Times stealth edits a Joe Biden story about an alleged sexual assault.

• This 2018 Jeff Carlson article has some interesting information about John Brennan.

• There are some golden nuggets in the declassified FISA IG report footnotes.

• Did the Wuhan Virus come from a Chinese lab?

Nunes drops a bombshell, reacts to reports of Russia trying to help Trump ~ Video ~ Fox News Channel

Rep. Devin Nunez (R-CA) is on The Breaking Story on Fox News Channel, and reacts to the reports of Russian election interference. It was reported that Rep. Nunez had gone to the White House after the classified intel briefing, which proved not to be true. However, somebody had leaked, supposedly, to the NY Times and Washington Post, that Russians were already trying to interfere with Election 2020.

Here's the story: Either somebody leaked classified information (could maybe Rep. Adam Shifty Schiff be a suspect?) to the media, or, the Washington Post and New York Times are knowingly reporting disinformation. Probably directly from the Russians? Hopefully, Rep. Nunez can find out which is true.

And before you even watch this video, be sure to think about who the Russians would want to help: President Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders?

The Media Fell Right Into the Trap ~ Ep. 1181 ~ The Dan Bongino Show® ~ Video

In this episode, I address the bombshell Spygate article dropped by The NY Times and the subsequent head-fake interview given by Attorney General Barr. Don’t fall for the nonsense, Barr knew exactly what he was doing.

I started off this post with the description (quoted above) of this video I'm sharing with you here. Just don't be fooled by Dan Bongino's humble way of describing a video that must be watched. I'm not going to give you too much of a spoiler clue, but in this episode, Dan really hits it out the park, about a very scary person running for President. Not to mention, somebody that was a previous President. "They're all connected, they all know each other, they all have things to hide." Bongino's words, and I am understanding it more and more, as I watch each episode.

If you don't watch this video from beginning to end, you're missing out on some very special information. I promise you. The more you learn from Dan, the more you will understand.

Bundy-Times sting: Worse than I thought ~ By Joseph Farah

I did get one thing right, however. I explained it wasn’t really Bundy the New York Times was out to get. It was his supporters – especially elected officials who denounced the heavy-handed and militaristic way the Bureau of Land Management went after Bundy and his family.

It’s called guilt by association – something “progressives” formerly denounced. But, in this case, there was nothing to feel guilty about, because Bundy didn’t say anything racist.

Meanwhile, the guy who I suspect is the mastermind of the efforts by government to make an example of Cliven Bundy yesterday showed his own hand.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called on all of his “progressive” friends to form a “united front” against Bundy.

I greatly appreciate and respect Joseph Farah's honesty. Like Joseph, I also felt the need to back up from my initial belief that Cliven Bundy was a racist after the story came out on Thursday, Apr. 24, 2014.

Many of us, even some of the biggest Bundy Ranch supporters originally, were swept up in the initial reaction.   And there are many of them that are still caught up with tearing down Cliven Bundy for his "racist remarks."  But, in light of the new information that has come out since Thursday, exposing the New York Times for making editorial adjustments in the original video of Cliven's statements, why haven't there been a few more apologies and retractions? That is a question that I have that I haven't been able to find an answer to. 

But, as time goes on, I'm sure that the scam perpetrated by the New York Times will eventually get around.  Cliven Bundy may never live down his poorly articulated racist sounding statements, but I am still sure that given his age and two black supporters that came to his defense, he'll be forgiven.  I'm hoping that others will understand what has happened, and this is why I'm so happy to let you all know about this column by Joseph Farah.  Let's go back to discussing Dirty Harry Reid's apparent corruption, and how it relates to what happened when the BLM invaded Bundy's Ranch.  Ya think?  Just sayin'...

RELATED STORIES:

• April 27, 2014 ~ CNN Goes Bundy-Trolling on Racial Issues & Gets Retort from Black Bodyguard They Don’t Expect ~ By Kyle Becker

• April 26, 2014 ~ VIDEO: Cliven Bundy goes racist! (Or, did he?)

• April 24, 2014 ~ New York Times sting entraps Bundy ~ By Joseph Farah

*    *    *    *

Bundy-Times sting: Worse than I thought

Joseph Farah

By Joseph Farah

Friday, April 25th, 2014

From wnd.com Commentary

First of all, let me begin by making an apology to Cliven Bundy.

In a slapdash column yesterday, I gave the New York Times more credit and credibility than it deserved.

I assumed, inappropriately and incorrectly, that the former newspaper of record had actually recounted the words of the Nevada rancher accurately and in context, given that there was an actual recording of the comments.

I was wrong.

After the Times smeared as a rock-ribbed racist through the use of selective quotes the new hero of resistance to tyranny in America, there was a new development: The video recording of the actual remarks emerged.

~~~ READ MORE on wnd.com Commentary ~~~

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

Video: The Enemy of the Press.... Finally?

I'll need to set up this video for you. I'm sure this was not a front page story in your local newspaper. As Andrew Beaujon wrote in a column on Poynter.com:

Nope!  Definitely not in this newspaper!

New York Times reporter James Risen, who is fighting an order that he testify in the trial of Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA officer accused of leaking information to him, opened the conference earlier by saying the Obama administration is “the greatest enemy of press freedom that we have encountered in at least a generation.” The administration wants to “narrow the field of national security reporting,” Risen said, to “create a path for accepted reporting.” Anyone journalist who exceeds those parameters, Risen said, “will be punished.”

Now, all you have to know, is that Obama has his ways to silence dissent.  But it doesn't just happen to Conservatives.  Maybe the liberals will finally get the idea that violations of the First and Fourth Amendments can affect them too.  You don't have to be a Conservative to be an enemy of the State or that Obama could be an enemy of the Press.  Just sayin'...

Please note:  To see the following video, you must be logged in to Facebook.

Post by Johnny2k's America.

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse!

Please note:  To see the johnny2k’s America videos on this blog, you must be logged in to Facebook.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

N.Y. Times edits truth of Climategate ~ By Jack Cashill

Commentary from WorldNetDaily

By Jack Cashill Posted: December 10, 2009 ~ 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 The respective investigations into the 1996 crash of TWA Flight 800 and into climate change have something very specific in common beyond the corruption of results for political ends. That is the role of the New York Times, in particular Times' environment reporter Andrew Revkin, in enabling that corruption. In both cases, Revkin and the Times would pick sides in a scientific controversy, cozy up to the side picked, champion its counterfeit data, and marginalize the opposition. As to "Climategate," the e-mails hacked from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit show Revkin very much an active participant in the information flow. What they reveal is an insecure reporter working hard to ingratiate himself with the world's most influential global-warming advocates. In one relatively benign e-mail to "dear all," for instance, Revkin addresses a specific "bone of contention with a lot of the anti-greenhouse-limits folks." Although the issue is too dense to explore here, Revkin concludes his e-mail with his trademark sycophancy: "hoping to show a bit of how that works.thanks for any insights. and i encourage you to comment and provide links etc with the current post to add context etc." Incredibly, after Climategate broke, the Times' editors allowed Revkin to continue covering the scandal even though he himself was central to the story. His subsequent reporting has drawn intense heat from critics, especially since his instinct has been to cover for his friends. "The evidence pointing to a growing human contribution to global warming is so widely accepted that the hacked material is unlikely to erode the overall argument," Revkin wrote at the scandal's outset. READ FULL STORY>>

Obama Death Threats Falsely Reported by CNN's Sanchez, Says Secret Service Director

From Associated Content

By J.C. Grant December 04, 2009 On August 28, 2009, CNN correspondent and left-wing extremist, Rick Sanchez, reported that death threats against President Obama are 400 percent higher than during previous administrations—something Sanchez invidiously attributed to anti-abortion groups. And then, on October 18, 2009, The Boston Globe, a self-described "progressive institution" and subsidiary of The New York Times, also reported that President Obama is a mark for more death threats than his predecessors—a circumstance The Boston Globe imputed to Americans opposed to a large federal government. According to Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan, however, both of these left-wing media reports are patently false. In fact, according to Director Sullivan, death threats against President Obama are no greater than those leveled against Presidents Bush and Clinton. During a CNN Newsroom report on August 28, Rick Sanchez delivered the following melodramatic report: "A CNN source with very close ties to the U.S. Secret Service confirmed to me today that threats on the life of the president of the United States have now risen by as much as 400 percent since his inauguration, 400 percent death threats against Barack Obama—quote-- 'in this environment' go far beyond anything the Secret Service has seen with any other president." (emphasis added) Similarly, The Boston Globe, in its article of October 18, wrote in material part: "The ... threat is ... growing, fueled ... by Obama's election as the nation's first black president .... Obama ... has been the target of more threats since his inauguration than his predecessors." (emphasis supplied) Quoting a study by known left-wing organization, The Southern Poverty Law Center, The Boston Globe continued on: "A key difference this time is that the federal government ... is headed by a black man." (emphasis added) READ FULL STORY >