In this episode, I discuss the astonishing interview of former Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski and the troubling ramifications for the election.
To the many low info voters out there, our freedom really is in peril. Yes I said that, and I'll tell you why it is true, beyond any reasonable doubt... that I would have, anyway. But, it is because I am not a low info voter. I spend most of my days/nights, hunkered down in my mancave office, soaking up information, and learning.
Do you know what our biggest threat to our country and our freedom is? I am sure if you have been watching the Dan Bongino show long enough, you would probably know. But, for those that haven't been, I'll fill you in: The fake news media. The fact that they are all in on dragging Joe Biden over the finish line is telling. Yes, I've seen the old legacy news outlets make editorial opinions that endorse a candidate, that's been going on as long as I've been following politics (since I was six or seven, I think). But now? It's not just an endorsement in the opinion section! It is now a constant onslaught of negative stories about one candidate, and, oh my, nothing about the apparent major corruption involving the other side. In fact, their ideological allies in Big Tech are trying to bury any news about alleged malfeasance on the Biden Crime Family stories, including the interview of Lt. Tony Bobulinski by Tucker Carlson about that little problem.
It amounts to media coordination with the Biden campaign, in order to not allow us to "know" about the things that Biden has done. They are using every trick in the Marxist and Saul Alinsky playbooks to keep the media silent, including intimidation of anyone that tries to tell you about what is going on with Biden Family corruption scandals. But, hey, they sure tried to tell everyone about Russian collusion with President Donald Trump, and the fake impeachment a year ago. Funny how the media excludes any exoneration of the President in the many books, a few by Dan Bongino, from being reported on.
And now, of course, like in 2016, they are so sure that the Demonicrats with Joe Biden being drug across the finish line, that they are again putting out fake news about the polls. Or, I guess that the fake polls are getting out in the news. Anyway, that should be no way for an election to be won. But then, the Demonicrats think that if they gaslight the public long enough, the deplorable chumps will just figure that the President is going to lose, and won't bother to vote. I can assure you all, that isn't going to happen, but we'll let the little trolls in the media keep trying to fan that flame. It's not going to work! Sorry. But, maybe next Tuesday, we'll find out if I'm right.
Just make sure you find the time to watch this episode. We are so blessed to have Dan here to keep on fighting and providing us with great information, and encouragement! Just keep praying for his healing.
I know, Dan Bongino would prefer that I embed the Rumble.com video here. However, I'm a little nervous when it comes to using Rumble's java script embedding code in my blogs, so that is why I'm still using the YouTube embedded video of the episode so you can see it here on this page. That being said, here is the link to the video of this episode so that you can watch it on Rumble.com.
Looking for news? The Bongino Report brings you the top conservative and libertarian news stories of the day, aggregated in an easy to read format to assist the public in getting accurate information.
From the Dan Bongino Show's description of this episode on youtube.com/Bongino or in his Show Notes:
In this episode, I address the real reason that the liberal media wants to stop the Trump rally. I also address the dreadful Supreme Court immigration ruling and why it could give the President an advantage when leaving office. Finally, I address the latest efforts by Twitter to sabotage the Trump campaign.
Finally, time to see this episode, and get started on my blog post for today. Today was the first time we've been allowed to visit my dad at his nursing home, who are doing their best to keep everyone safe. We haven't been able to see him in person for over three months. We could have done some video thing they have set up, which none of us (me and my siblings) were probably able to do. Well, I could, but couldn't get a time of the day for an appointment that fits my night owl schedule. Well, of course, I got started watching the Trump Rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, but then realized I could write now and watch the Trump rally later with my DVR.
One of the biggest takeaways from Episode 1279 was about why the Trump Rally (RALLIES!) frighten the heck out of the Demonicrats. This first segment came just after the Legacy Box spot at the beginning of the show. Yes, when Dan was talking about the liberals and "their liberal media arsenal," he was talking about how the Demonicrats work hand-in-hand with their allies in the lying fake news media. Along the way, he shows a montage of the media talking about the dreaded Coronavirus being spread around like the black plague, and everybody will die, but noting that there is not much discussion about the Pandemic when it comes to the George Floyd demonstrations. Yes, political campaigning: Bad; and protesting, with a little looting and arson going on: No problem!
Well, I noticed that very distinctly over the last 3 weeks or so, whereas somebody that I talked to today, that only watches just a half hour of news per day on ABC at dinner time, ummm.... not so much. For the low info voter, I guess you can put it like this: There is misinformation, disinformation, and actually NO information.
Misinformation is when headlines guide the person to a conclusion that really wouldn't be what the person would get if they read the entire article. Disinformation is when the news story is totally fabricated, and has untruthful sources. That's Fake News at it's worst, or should I say, at it's normal? And if there is a correction or retraction, it is buried somewhere around page 52. And then, you have the worst kind of news reporting (I refuse to call it journalism at all), and that is the NO information kind of news. That's where you bury the viewers with a bunch of anti-Trump stories, for example, and a whole bunch of fluff stories, but totally ignore stories that aren't supportive of their agenda and narrative. Like, the liberal news media surely wouldn't want Americans to know that there is a group called Antifa, who is a designated domestic terrorist group now. The low info person I talked to today, that watches ABC News almost every night, never heard of Antifa. Imagine that. But no, can't watch Fox News, because it is just one sided? I'm trying, folks, really want to get people away from the MSM networks and newspapers.
Okay, I got to hammer this blog home today. Dominos will be arriving soon, and there's a story that needs to be discussed. The headline: "Mayan calendar predicts end of the world today, claim conspiracy theorists." If that's not scary enough for you today, then go ahead and make sure you see Dan's last segment in this episode. Oh, and be sure to read the related story I added, which was in Dan's Show Notes. When you put the two pieces of the puzzle together, it might give you a picture you weren't hoping to see. So, make sure that if he is still with us, that you wish your father a happy Father's Day today. Yes, I made sure to do that. And if we are still around, I'll be getting the interview on Episode 1280 blog up here tomorrow.
And if you would like to, and if you have followed the very good advice of my friend Dan Bongino, please be sure to share this post on PARLER.COM! That would make me very happy if you do!
You can read the transcript here, but these are the points that stood out like a one legged man in a fanny-kicking contest:
Fact: it was the anniversary of 9/11.
Whistle blower Greg Hicks calls Washington to advise that Ambassador Stevens said that he and the Benghazi consulate were under attack. General Carter Ham tells Washington that our consulate is under siege and our ambassador may be a hostage.
Fact: everyone in Washington knew what was going on based on the drones, the satellites, the audio, the real-time phone calls. They attacked with heavy artillery and rocket propelled grenades.
Fact: it was a tight presidential race, Barack Obama campaigning as a war hero - a real commander-in chief, claiming al Qaeda was on its heels. Obama loses all credibility if the nation thinks al Qaeda destroyed our consulate and killed four Americans. So the conspiracy about a grotesque video begins.
Former CIA Director Mike Morell removes the word "Islamists" in describing "extremists." He takes out references to the previous CIA warnings of an al Qaeda attack.
Fact: the joint chiefs and defense secretary say troops couldn't get there in time to save our men on the ground.
The fiction begins. It wasn't al Qaeda, it was an anti-Muslim American-made video. Before our eyes, the terrorists become the victims, and the American victims become irrelevant. The president repeats the fiction on "The View," on "David Letterman," at the U.N.
Of course, Judge Jeanine Pirro's Opening Statement segment which appeared at the beginning of her show last Saturday (May 3, 2014), has to be classified as commentary. However, notice the that in the text above, a transcript of what she said in this segment, had the word "Fact" involved. And she couldn't have been any more blunt in her Opening Statement, unless she was Joni Ernst talking about castrating hogs as a kid or taking aim at ObamaCare if she wins the Iowa GOP nomination for the U.S. Senate! Talking about a smoking gun! (Yep, I said that! Take it however you want!)
It should surprise no one with even half of their brain cells tied behind their back that the Leftists out there will try to disparage what was heard in Judge Jeanine's opening statement. Obviously, this will be so disturbing to them that they will have no choice but to invoke every one of Saul Alinsky's "Rules For Radicals" in order to denigrate everything Judge Jeanine says in this segment. Let them try it! It won't work, because the Judge's great commentary is based on facts that can be, and have been, proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Yep, don't forget, Judge Jeanine was a Prosecuting Attorney AND a judge. She knows how to prove a case.
Hey Lefty liberals, you can keep trying to save Obama's legacy, but you're going to lose your argument. You can no longer defend the Obama administration. Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) is going to eat Obama's lunch with the Select Committee he will probably be heading. Just sayin'...
Please note: To see the following video, you must be logged in to Facebook.
As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text. Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse!
Please note: To see the johnny2k’s America videos on this blog, you must be logged in to Facebook.
I was pretty sure that by now, I'd be a martyr. Not that I intended to be, but I figured that a few of the WIFLI Briefings that I've published this year would get me on some kind of enemies list that the current
White House administration may be compiling. Surprisingly, at least to me, my efforts haven't yet shown up on the radar screen.
It would certainly be beneficial to my purpose if only I were to be disparaged by a leftist writer or organized effort to silence me. But, so far, nothing...
I can only surmise that I just haven't been loud enough. I need a bullhorn, I guess. Or perhaps I should just stay persistent, and try to do my best to expose what the President is all about. America needs to be aware that he is a Socialist and a Globalist, and we really haven't yet seen how far he would go to stay in power. That is what should scare us. That is what should tell you why I'm not afraid to post what I have so far.
Synopsis: Every age seeks visionaries to leave, in the wake of their genius, a changed world - but rarely are they found without a few strikeout also-rans getting a crack first. In 2008, millions of Americans thought they had found the real thing.
Honestly? I have to warn you, do not attempt this at home. It can be pretty darn disconcerting when we realize that our opponents have the financial and political power to silence us at any time... Well, US, as in the citizen journalists writing in favor of We the People and freedom. If any of us hit the wrong nerve, believe me, we could be snuffed out at a moment's notice. That's reality talking there, not sheer paranoia.
It was once I knew what the stakes were that I became a little nervous. If perhaps Barack Hussein Obama has his sites set on leading a global government, who knows what will be done to stop me, or anyone else, from informing the public. Who really knows WHAT could be done to anyone that is in the way of Obama's objectives.
No, I'm afraid that I'll not fear what needs to be said. Fear is not an emotion that I want to ever bow down to if I am going to help wake up some more patriots.
The concept of fear has to be overcome, and the only way to do so is to band together as We the People.
Our best chance of survival as a Free people will be to hang in there together. There is safety in numbers. I'm just sayin'...
UPDATE: JUNE 9, 2012
Don't you get so annoyed when you discover that something you have written or said could be taken differently from how you intended? When I mentioned "hang in there together" above, the following video wasn't what I was thinking of. However, if the scene you will see below becomes our fate, then let me fight for freedom - feet first - rather than being a slave on my knees. Yo ho, haul together, Hoist the colours high. I'm just sayin'...
Welcome to this edition of Time 2 Escape WIFLI Briefing!
What is WIFLI?
You may be wondering what the acronym "WIFLI" means. I started out by calling these issues the Time 2 Escape Daily, but that didn't work out very well. I quickly learned that putting these issues together on a daily basis was a task I was unable to accomplish. To replace "Daily" in the title, I borrowed the acronym WIFLI, which literally means "When I Feel Like It." Putting together a post on this blog WIFLI works much better for my schedule, and for the higher quality of each issue that is eventually published! FAIR USE NOTICE: This edition of the Time 2 Escape WIFLI Briefing may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
* * * *
The Fox & Friends Video News Corp. Doesn't Want You To See From Before It's News ~ By Arlen Williams ~ June 3, 2012, 12:18 pm
Fox and Friends took it this far and what was broadcast was quickly taken down from their Web site. They didn’t even get to the intentional saboteur for globalist Marxofascists part.
And of course, they didn’t get to the fact that many of the very same people who promoted Barack Obama (or Hillary Clinton) have been putting their money and encouraging words behind Mitt Romney – and are once again, getting their way...
Of course, the Obama minions are well trained with the Saul Alinsky techniques as described in "Rules For Radicals." Here is one of the Liberal columnists that I suspect is desperately attempting to explain why President Obama is NOT a Socialist, and discredit those of us that have exposed Obama's connections to Socialism that seem to be found on a very regular basis. Obama a socialist? Many scoff, but claim persists Via BEFORE IT'S NEWS ~ From Charlotte Observer ~ By David Crary, AP Nat'l Writer ~ Posted: Monday, Jun. 04, 2012
NEW YORK When President Barack Obama's re-election campaign unveiled its new slogan, some conservative critics were quick to pounce.
"Forward," they asserted, is a word long associated with Europe's radical left. Its choice reaffirmed their contention that Obama is, to some degree or other, a socialist - a claim that surfaced early in the 2008 campaign and has persisted ever since, fueling a lively industry of bumper stickers and books..
"New Obama slogan has long ties to Marxism, socialism," read a headline in The Washington Times. A column by Russian immigrant Svetlana Kunin, for Investor's Business Daily, said Obama seeks to move America forward to "total government involvement in people's lives."
This is far from a new phenomenon - the use of "socialist" as a political epithet in the U.S. dates back to pre-Civil War days when abolitionist newspaper editor Horace Greeley was branded a socialist by some pro-slavery adversaries. In the 20th century, many elements of Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal - including Social Security - were denounced as socialist. So was Medicare when it was created in the 1960s.
But to many historians and political scientists - and to actual socialists as well - the persistent claim that Obama is a socialist lacks credence.
In America, when it comes to opposing the ground war against our sovereignty, freedom, livelihoods and lives known as Agenda 21, we gratefully follow along with Three Musketeers and one d’Artagnan. Of course there are others also worthy of mention; some we have and will again.
Conveniently, all four have Web sites and since they do, rather than expound we will show you videos featuring each. We Citizens should know their work well and continue to follow them. Here they are, listed in a suggested order of those videos.
Henry Lamb – Chairman of Sovereignty International, and founder of the Environmental Conservation Organization (ECO) and Freedom21, Inc. (sovereignty.net, freedom.org, and freedom21.org, respectively). We publish Henry’s articles.
Sadly, one of the great heroes discussed above has passed on.
His legacy, as you have been made aware of by now, is his valiant battle against the anti-freedom movement of globalism. Henry Lamb was a patriot that we need to honor for his courage. His columns were greatly appreciated by those of us that want to maintain our freedom. He made sure that I was very aware of the dangers of globalism. Part 2 of Vetting Barry will be dedicated to Henry Lamb, with the discussion of the Marxist-based globalist ideologies. Henry Lamb (1938-2012) Led vs. Global Socialism, Silenced by American Media? From GULAG BOUND ~ By Arlen Williams ~ Published May 28, 2012, 5:30 pm
We all have an innate need to find one person and call him leader. As the story many of us know goes, we are made for an intimately dependent relationship with God Himself our Father; but mankind failed to live up to its part and that need became tragically unfulfilled. While God in turn made a Great Sacrifice to meet our need, much of one’s sense of its fulfillment is yet a prospect awaiting its future.
That prospect and Henry Lamb came face to face last Wednesday morning, May 23rd. Now, those compatriots who knew him or at least knew of him must suppress all the more, such desires for an earthly king, or a captain of our vessel. More than ever, all of America’s Sovereigns must each learn to take on his accountable role, to lead our nation securely into its own sovereign future.
Many more than I will say he was preeminent in the work to keep our free and independent nation from returning to its former status of colonization by tyrannical global empire. His chief work was to alert us against the usurpation of our rank and rights via the monstrously insidious “think globally, act locally” strategy of U.N. Agenda 21 and sustainable development.
Several years ago, I made a decision to do my best to educate more people about what is going on with America. Our freedom is threatened. This video explains my attitude that I will keep doing what I can to help more Americans "cross the finish line" - to maintain their liberty - even if it meant that I would be sacrificing any career advancement. As far as I'm concerned, that is the attitude of a true winner!
Welcome to this edition of Time 2 Escape WIFLI Brief!
What is WIFLI?
You may be wondering what the acronym "WIFLI" means. I started out by calling these issues the Time 2 Escape Daily, but that didn't work out very well. I quickly learned that putting these issues together on a daily basis was a task I was unable to accomplish. To replace "Daily" in the title, I borrowed the acronym WIFLI, which literally means "When I Feel Like It." Putting together a post on this blog WIFLI works much better for my schedule, and for the higher quality of each issue that is eventually published! FAIR USE NOTICE: This edition of the Time 2 Escape WIFLI Briefing may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
No, I'm not gone yet. I'm not done yet.
The government hasn't come to take me away, ...yet.
There is an advantage to being just one little citizen journalist, too tiny to see, able to fly under the radar...so far.
I open this briefing with the above words, because I am wondering how long it may be that I have the opportunity to keep paying it forward for the liberty of our children and grandchildren.
No, I had a slight physical affliction that affected my productivity in the last two weeks, and will soon have another medical procedure done on me that will prevent me from doing much here in April (2012). I don't like it much when I can not perform up to the standards that I expect from myself.
I read an incredible edition of Ralph Marston's Daily Motivator during my "down time" that did keep my inspiration high, and at least kept me hoping for a quick recovery. I knew this was a quote that should be spread far and wide in order to keep the love of liberty going:
Most of the work of achievement is done when no one is paying attention. Those who achieve, do the work even though it is difficult, demanding, tedious and far from glamorous.
More often than not, even the most impressive results come from plenty of plain old, ordinary hard work. It’s not extraordinary talent that distinguishes achievers, but rather an extraordinary level of commitment to getting the work done.
It was pretty much an exercise of torture for me, like water-boarding, when I knew that I had so much to say, but was physically unable to just do the ordinary, let alone, the extraordinary. But at least I was able to go through the motions by determining the content I wanted to include in this issue.
Just don't freak out when my next absence occurs in the first part of April 2012. It can't be helped, but I do believe that we will somehow endure another lengthy time of inactivity here on the Time 2 Escape blog. I will, however, have some of "my people" keeping me advised of what needs to be included in the next issue that you will see here. One of those friends has already contributed to this briefing, and I owe a lot of gratitude to that individual.
I also owe some fist bumps to the Anonymous person that wrote a comment on my previous blog post. I don't get a lot of comments here, but one that was written made a lot of sense. It may explain a lot about our culture. and what you will read in this post that Paul Harvey talked about, that we have a short attention span. If that's the case, folks, we're going to lose. We need to focus, even if we can only do just a little bit every day. Just keep in mind the wise words of Ralph Marston, that "the most impressive results come from plenty of plain old, ordinary hard work. It’s not extraordinary talent that distinguishes achievers, but rather an extraordinary level of commitment to getting the work done."
Sometimes, we have to just be happy to take one bite of the elephant at a time. It's a long process. The Commies (Progressives) took just a 100 years to accomplish their goals here in America. I'm just sayin'...
Breitbart.com has uncovered video from 1995 of then-U.S. Attorney Eric Holder announcing a public campaign to "really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way."
Holder was addressing the Woman's National Democratic Club. In his remarks, broadcast by CSPAN 2, he explained that he intended to use anti-smoking campaigns as his model to "change the hearts and minds of people in Washington, DC" about guns.
"What we need to do is change the way in which people think about guns, especially young people, and make it something that's not cool, that it's not acceptable, it's not hip to carry a gun anymore, in the way in which we changed our attitudes about cigarettes."
Holder added that he had asked advertising agencies in the nation's capital to assist by making anti-gun ads rather than commercials "that make me buy things that I don't really need." He had also approached local newspapers and television stations, he said, asking them to devote prime space and time, respectively, to his anti-gun campaign.
Holder 1995: We Must 'Brainwash' People Against Guns
Yesterday, Breitbart.com revealed exclusive video of then-U.S. Attorney Eric Holder speaking to the Woman’s National Democratic Club, stating that he wanted to “brainwash” people against gun ownership.
The video reveals Attorney General Holder’s early, consistent, and strident enthusiasm for gun control legislation. He wanted schools to talk about anti-gun propaganda “every day, every school, and every level."
ATTY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER
Operation Fast and Furious -- in which Holder’s Department of Justice (DOJ) smuggled guns illegally to Mexican drug cartels -- could finally have provided Holder the material for that anti-gun curriculum.
On December 7, 2011, CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson (who is the only one in the mainstream media faithfully reporting this story) shared documents proving that the motive behind Operation Fast & Furious was to implement harsher gun regulations.
Ms. Attkisson reported that Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) officials within the DOJ discussed using the illegal gun sales to justify “Demand Letter 3,” which would require some gun shops to report the sales of multiple rifles or long guns.
Each new revelation pushes Operation Fast and Furious up the chain of command and provides more evidence that it was to be used for more gun control.
The mainstream media tends to trickle out small bits of narrative as a story goes on. However, the first impression is the one that seems to prevail, just like when we meet new people. Our collective sentiment builds up to a point of no return, based on the initial elements of the story that we hear and see, over and over again.
But thanks to the new media - the citizen journalists - you will now find out more about a story which shatters the initial media spin of some kind of aggravated hate crime, where an innocent young black man was shot in cold blood because he was wearing a hoodie.
From this story: "Most media accounts of the story suggest Martin was walking down the street minding his own business when he was shot without provocation by Zimmerman." We learn, though, that it didn't really go down that way. I'm just wondering nowif the New Black Panthers will put a bounty on my head, too, for letting you know about this?
Maybe George Zimmerman did act in self-defense when he shot and killed Trayvon Martin, whose death Feb. 26 in Sanford, Florida, has been the focus of a media and political circus that even included Barack Obama weighing in this week.
TRAYVON MARTIN
An eyewitness to the incident told police Martin was beating Zimmerman before he shot him.
Zimmerman had called 911 to report the suspicious activities of a youth in his neighborhood, telling the dispatcher that he was following Martin.
On the recording of another 911 call, repeated cries of “help” can be heard before the gunshot.
The witness, identified only as John, says those cries were made by Zimmerman who was on the ground being beaten by Martin.
“The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: ‘help, help … and I told him to stop and I was calling 911,” he said.
The White House’s late-week release of an executive order has sent the online community into an uproar, worried that President Obama had secretly provided himself means to institute martial law in America.
In the common practice of dumping government documents on a Friday afternoon, just as the news cycle is wrapping up for the week – a move critics say allows the administration to avoid widespread coverage of embarrassing actions – the White House released an executive order on “National Defense Resources Preparedness.”
Filled with language about “government-owned equipment” and a “defense executive reserve,” among other vague statements, rumors began to spread that the executive order expanded the president’s power to do everything from seizing whole industries to drafting private armies.
A Canada Free Press article titled “Obama Executive Order: Peacetime Martial Law!” spread concerns of gasoline ration cards; while an Examiner article declared the order would “nationalize everything” and “allow for a civilian draft.” Facebook, email and Twitter were suddenly abuzz, and even the extremely popular Drudge Report posted a link to the White House release under the title “Martial Law? Obama Issues Executive Order.”
But are the cries of martial law and expanding executive power justified?
I’m getting really, really sick of these pundits and talking heads on the so-called “right” clucking their tongues at the unwashed masses and telling us that we’re crazy and paranoid to be the least bit concerned each and every time the Obama regime takes another stride toward totalitarianism. And it is EACH AND EVERY TIME.
Let me break it down for Ed Morrissey, and all of the other pundits in that social circle so that you can get your heads around this. We are concerned and even, dare I say it, panicked, because we can see the big picture of the Obama regime for what it is. We can take the totality of the dataset and draw not just a logical, reasoned conclusion, but a conclusion that is supported by centuries – nay millenia – of past precedent.
We are, as Patrick Henry put it, “willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.”
Why is the 3/16/2012 Executive Order worthy of grave concern? Simply put, because of the man and the regime who issued it... [EMPHASISMINE]
They used to say, “He is not a Communist!” Now they say, “What’s so wrong with Communism?”
I got this email from my 28 year old friend “Al” yesterday:
We aren’t living in the 1950’s anymore. Why is there a fear of the communist bogeyman? Isn’t creating and perpetuating this fear just another form of propaganda?
Obviously, this boy has been brainwashed. I was so frustrated a cartoon cyclone came out of my head and ears. Then I wrote him back:
We aren’t living in the 1950′s anymore…so, suddenly communism works?! Which country is it working in?! (I wanted to say ‘you idiot!’) North Korea, Russia, Cuba? Are people flocking there to live? Risking their lives on rafts to get there?
The liberal Miami Herald today had an article about tourists visiting Cuba. They hated to admit that the place is a falling apart poverty stricken mess. They didn’t use the “c” word of course to explain why it suddenly went bad when Castro took over. All they would offer was, “…There’s no way tourism alone can prop up a system so enfeebled by the weight of government bureaucracy, market controls and limits on personal freedoms.”
“…a system enfeebled by the weight of government bureaucracy, market controls and limits on personal freedoms…” sounds like the Obama administration.
28 year old – do you want America to look like Cuba? Than stop defending communism!
The “utopia” of communism killed 94 million, according to The Black Book of Communism.
... Finally, Trevor Loudon makes it simple. Why should young people hate communism?
... READ MORE ...
* * * *
OUTSIDE of the BOX
This is the part where I put it all together. I hope you have been paying close attention.
Paul Harvey, in 1965, tells you about what the evil soviet empire wanted to accomplish, and how they would accomplish their objective. This will be followed by a video that tells us how Saul Alinsky helped the goals along the way. Now, all you have to realize is that the President studied Alinsky's tactics. I think you'll see how so many pieces of the puzzle now fit together.
Glenn played some incredible audio this morning on the radio program of radio commentator Paul Harvey from 1965. Glenn knew Harvey, and described him as “absolutely inspired of God.”
Last night on GBTV, Glenn explained to viewers that America has crossed over into new territory. “The progressives, I believe, have realized their dream. They have taken those baby steps,” Glenn said. “It is time to stop studying progressives.”
Glenn challenged those that don’t think the progressives have accomplished their goals to “listen to the prophetic words of radio commentator Paul Harvey.”
The audio is of Paul Harvey explaining how he would destroy us [America] if he were Satan…
“If I were the devil, I wouldn’t be happy until I had seized the ripest apple on the tree—Thee. So I’d set about however necessary to take over the United States. I’d subvert the churches first—I would begin with a campaign of whispers. With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve: “Do as you please.” “Do as you please.” To the young, I would whisper, “The Bible is a myth.” I would convince them that man created God instead of the other way around. I would confide that what is bad is good, and what is good is “square”. And the old, I would teach to pray. I would teach them to pray after me, ‘Our Father, which art in Washington…’
And then I’d get organized. I’d educate authors on how to lurid literature exciting, so that anything else would appear dull and uninteresting. I’d threaten TV with dirtier movies and vice versa. I’d pedal narcotics to whom I could. I’d sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction. I’d tranquilize the rest with pills.
If I were the devil I’d soon have families that war with themselves, churches that war that themselves, and nations that war with themselves; until each in its turn was consumed. And with promises of higher ratings I’d have mesmerizing media fanning the flame. If I were the devil I would encourage schools to refine young intellects, and neglect to discipline emotions—just let those run wild, until before you knew it, you’d have to have drug sniffing dogs and metal detectors at every schoolhouse door.
Within a decade I’d have prisons overflowing, I’d have judges promoting pornography—soon I could evict God from the courthouse, and then the schoolhouse, and then from the houses of Congress. And in His own churches I would substitute psychology for religion, and deify science. I would lure priests and pastors into misusing boys and girls, and church money. If I were the devil I’d make the symbols of Easter an egg and the symbol of Christmas a bottle.
If I were the devil I’d take from those, and who have, and give to those wanted until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious. What do you bet I could get whole states to promote gambling as the way to get rich? I would question against extremes and hard work, and Patriotism, and moral conduct. I would convince the young that marriage is old-fashioned, that swinging more fun, that what you see on the TV is the way to be. And thus I could undress you in public, and I could lure you into bed with diseases for which there is no cure. In other words, if I were to devil I’d keep on doing on what he’s doing. Paul Harvey, good day.”
“That is unbelievable,” Glenn said after listening to the audio.
The truth is that, throughout history, the vile left has never been interested in lifting people up. Instead of focusing on income inequality, their focus should be on setting people free – to be on their own! – to go as far as their talents and hard work will take them.
Robert Ringer's column titillated my sincere desire to make sure that his writing is read by as many people as possible. This is about We the People knowing that the President is wrong about what needs to be done to help the American people, and Robert reinforces our knowledge of what has been going on in this country since President Obama came on the scene four years ago. We really wish more people had been aware of what then candidate Obama told "Joe the Plumber," that he wants to "spread the wealth around."
The scariest thing is that not only were people not listening and staying informed, but that they ignored the warning signs of what was to come in Obama's first three years. President Obama and his Marxist minions are of the belief that government can solve all of our problems. Conservatives believe that individual responsibility with laissez faire free market capitalism ultimately does better in the end: Every time. Why would anyone want to change how we do things that has helped America prosper in the past few centuries?
But as I read through the column several more times, I discovered another two paragraphs that influenced me to say something about what We the People can do to prove the President is wrong, and Robert Ringer is right:
No civilized person wants to see those who are seriously health challenged or mentally challenged suffer, so the question is not whether or not such people should be helped. The question is, who is best equipped to help them – politicians, whose chief aim is to perpetuate their own power, or free individuals, who have a genuine desire to be charitable to those who are incapable of fending for themselves?
If the scam of politicians taking from those who produce and giving the stolen loot to those whom they deem to be "in need" worked, the poverty rate would not be about the same today (14.3 percent) as it was when the Great Society was launched back in 1965. What Lyndon Johnson's "generosity" proved is that it doesn't matter how much of other people's money you give away, it does nothing to lift people up. The hard evidence shows that it is government's redistribution-of-wealth policies that have not worked.
No, we do not really need the government to be our nanny. And being that this is the Christmas season, this is the opportune time to make this proposal; there is never a better time to display the great generosity of the American people. YOU, not the government, can reach out to give less fortunate people assistance in many ways.
Hopefully, you have heard about the "pay it forward" events where people pay for the meal at a fast food establishment for the person in line behind them. It also recently came to the attention of the media that there have been anonymous donors that help out people that are trying to pay off a layaway purchase at various retail establishments.
We are aware of all the people with the financial capability that give large sums of money to many of the various charities and "causes." We even help out orphans around the world by funding or adopting them. America is still the most generous nation on the planet.
But, there is still the possibility that we could actually go a step further.
It is my belief that if every one of us that has the financial means, the time, and the opportunity to help out one other individual or family that is struggling along, there probably wouldn't be a need for government agencies to step in and spend the taxpayer's money on the many programs that have been instituted in order for us to gain some type of "collective salvation."
We the People really can prove that Robert Ringer is right, and Obama and his Marxist minions are wrong. We the People can make a concentrated effort to help lift up those that really could benefit from our assistance.
Between now and next November, and that really isn't too long from now, it is time to re-educate the American population, and counter all the lies that have been fed to the masses by those on the left in the schools, unions, the media, and most of all, the government. If We the People step up, we can make a very positive impact on what - or who - less fortunate people expect to come to their assistance.
Isn't it time that we start thinking about others? Our friends, our relatives, or our neighbors? Can you do something to help out somebody? I am sure you can. Even moral support can help. Let's take this country back from those that keep their power because they can take from those that have to give to give to people that don't have. WE the PEOPLE can do a much better job! I think that we can show that "You're-on-your-own economics" has worked, and always will.
It's time to learn and teach that is better to love your neighbor rather than the government. I'm just sayin'...
Oops! The presidential pretender went and did it again. A lot of red ink has passed over the socialist dam since he unthinkingly told Joe the Plumber that he wants to "spread the wealth around."
Or since he told Charlie Gibson that "It's a matter of fairness" when Gibson repeatedly asked him to explain why he would want to raise the capital-gains tax when the historical evidence proves that higher capital-gains taxes actually decrease government revenues.
Of course, there have been endless not-so-subtle clues as to Obama's impeccable collectivist credentials since then, but, on the whole, he tends to choose his words carefully so as not to awaken the sleeping frogs. One must always be mindful not to let the water get too hot.
But last week Obama let it all hang out in a speech at a Kansas high school when he said, "[T]here is a certain crowd in Washington who, for the last few decades, have said, 'Let's respond to this economic challenge with the same old tune. The market will take care of everything,' they tell us. If we just cut more regulations and cut more taxes – especially for the wealthy – our economy will grow stronger."
Moving in for the kill, he went on to say, "And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. But here's the problem: It doesn't work. It has never worked. … I mean, understand, it's not as if we haven't tried this theory. We simply cannot return to this brand of you're-on-your-own economics if we're serious about rebuilding the middle class in this country."
That's right, folks, capitalism had nothing to do with the United States becoming the most prosperous country in the history of the world. It had nothing to do with millions of ambitious people starting with nothing and becoming millionaires and even billionaires. And it has nothing to do with the fact that "poor people" (as defined by the Census Bureau) in the U.S. live better than middle-class people in most other countries.
Now, you tell me, which type of leadership is going to win us back the White House: one that rallies the country or divides the house?
With totally certainty, I can say that Chuck Norris undoubtedly hits the nail on the head in this column, and it is the most important column I've read so far in this election cycle.
While you need to read this column in full, beginning to end, I need to give you one more quote that is of vital importance, one that is of total relevance to defeating Barack Hussein Obama in 2012:
Every conservative I know agrees that any GOP candidate will be better than the leadership we currently have in the White House. I firmly believe their positive attributes definitely outweigh any of their negatives.
With about three weeks to the Iowa Caucus, it's high time that we quit allowing the left and even our own preferences and prejudice to polarize us any further. It's time we lay down our egos and our innate bent to tear down and fight to unify for our republic's sake. If we are going to win the war for the White House, it's going to be solely in our ability to rally together and keep our scopes on the current occupant of the White House, not by aiming at one other.
Before I read Chuck's column, I read what Herman Cain had to say in his column on the same day. Here is part of my commentary about what Herman was saying, and it is perfectly relevant to the wisdom of Chuck Norris that you will read today:
As to this coming election in 2012, the major effort still needs to be focused on defeating Obama. That could possibly mean nominating a squishy RINO Republican candidate. Whatever it takes, right? If that is the outcome, what Herman Cain has suggested in this column will become even more significant, as you will read. We the People need to be able to put the pressure on whoever wins the White House and Congress!
Now, it is time for me to make a request of you, the reader. I know you are one that cares about our future and our freedom, so I'm assuming that you will understand this request is not just so I can promote this column or my blog. What would really help would be if you were to disseminate this column, this blog post, to as many of the GOP Presidential candidates, Conservative columnists, bloggers and talk radio show hosts as possible. WE the People need to spread the word, far and wide!
This election should be up to you, and not the media outlets - Conservative or Progressive. It is time for WE the People that want to avert the loss of our liberties as given to us in the Constitution of the United States. We need to have a little faith right now in what WE the People can do when we unite. The Tea Party Movement is STILL a movement that allows us keep us unified, if we allow it to. Along with this great column by Chuck Norris, we have been schooled on the abilitiy for us to keep spreading the hope for freedom that will still be here for our children and grandchildren!
You've heard of "Peace through Strength" before, right? Well, this is "Strength through Peace" amongst our candidates and the pundits. Let's quit giving the enemy the ability to divide us, alright? I'm just sayin'...
Charles Dillon "Casey" Stengel, the early 20th century baseball legend who played on five teams and managed four, said, "It's easy to get good players. Getting them to play together, that's the hard part."
What's true in sports is definitely true in politics, but even more so.
Many say, 'tis the season for GOP rivalry, but when does inference turn to infighting? When does public debate dismantle our conservative solidarity? When do campaign commercials compromise our unity to fight together? And when does friendly bantering turn into friendly fire that is fuel for our foes?
I know we are in a GOP presidential race. I understand the tactics to win a regular election, but this is no typical run for the presidency. There is a progressive insurrection underway, and at the heart of their political warfare is the disunity of conservative consensus.
In this unique presidential race, I would propose at this particular point that our infighting is, indeed, not only the recipe for the president's petroleum but also a major strategy in the progressives' plan to keep their incumbent in the Oval Office.
Former House Speaker and GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich told an audience in Iowa last week, "President Obama is legitimately and authentically a Saul Alinsky radical." I completely agree, as well as the majority who truly understand Obama's origins and political philosophies. Even the New York Times back in August 2009 wrote, "Saul Alinsky, the Chicago activist and writer whose street-smart tactics influenced generations of community organizers, most famously the current president …"
Alinsky's bible for community organizers is "Rules for Radicals," the principles of which can be viewed in almost every action of the left, including the present White House. For example, in the chapter on "power tactics," the fourth tactic is: "Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules." While conservatives regard congruity as commendable, Alinsky considers it an opportunity for raising disdain among the public and infighting among enemies, because no one can perfectly live up to his or her own message.
This is where Alinsky's fifth rule follows and applies: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." And the best missile in that arsenal is the friendly fire (ridicule) caused within the enemies' own camps.
Thirty years ago, I could perhaps see young conservatives having certain doubts over liberals' claims that it was preposterous to think a cyclopean, socialist state was in the offing – but not now. Thirty years ago, I was one of those young conservatives, and I had already seen and experienced many of the evils progressivism had wrought. How much more human suffering have Americans endured at their hands since then?
And how much awaits us in the future – when people such as Obama attain the kind of power they really want?
Victoria Jackson: THERE'S A COMMUNIST IN THE WHITE HOUSE!
Erik Rush confirms Victoria Jackson's statement that there is a communist in the White House. Erik goes one step further. He tells of a New York Times article on March 10, 2011 that says, "Mr. Obama has told people that it would be so much easier to be the president of China." And why is that such an incredibly scary statement to be made by the President?
As one blogger put it, "Of course it would. Then he could just slaughter those disruptive Gadsden flag-waving tea partiers," pointing to how that hero of Obama cabinet members, Mao Zedong, slaughtered 70 million people to get the other 700 million to fall in line. How wonderful it would be if Obama could only operate entirely without restraint!
Should the commie-in-chief happen to win re-election in November 2012, by appearing to move to the center to nullify the worries of many Americans that may be thinking that Victoria Jackson is correct, he would then have free reign to do what he wants to without having to worry about re-election in 2016. (Or, then again, maybe NEVER worry about re-election! One of those things Obama could do with one more term would be to follow in the footsteps of his Venezuelan mentor, Hugo Chavez, and virtually become President for life. By hook or crook, Obama would just need to get the 22nd Amendment repealed.)
Of course, some people that read my comments above or Erik's column will think that this is all very far-fetched. I would disagree. There are honestly too many things that we really do not know for sure about Obama, just for the fact that he refuses to allow certain records become public record. However, we do know who he has surrounded himself with, not just while in the White House, but during his entire life, as Erik mentions. Many of his actions as President so far would also give us a clue, too. At least I know that I am not the only one who believes that the speculative projection of Obama's future actions, to the detriment of America, are plausible.
Our Creator gifted human beings with moral freedom (that being the ability to choose between good and evil) with good reason. Those reasons were His own, but since they would initiate an entire theological discussion, I won't get into them here.
America's founders reasoned that establishing a nation that observed the sanctity of that freedom would be of the highest moral good. This is why the American system of governance, though not perfect, is superior to those that have come before or since, and why this nation has enjoyed so many blessings. It gave rise to social, technological, industrial, economic and, yes, spiritual advancement and the ability to share those blessings with the rest of the world.
Up until about 40 years ago, this was also the conventional wisdom among Americans.
Those who find fault with the premises concerning the motives of God and the founders will, of course, disagree; likewise for those who subscribe to the propaganda of America's ideological opponents, which maintains that the United States has simply prospered through predatory, opportunistic associations with less technologically developed nations and our imperialistic designs. This line of reasoning is inane and was originally part of the doctrine of our foreign enemies. Once progressive elites did away with classical education and critical thinking, the inane was readily adopted by wayward Western minds – including those of millions of Americans.
This is, by the by, the worldview with which President Barack Obama was raised. An avowed communist mother and father, a card-carrying communist in mentor Frank Marshall Davis, communist employers in the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and others, and assorted Leninists and Maoists in such people as Van Jones, Valerie Jarrett and Anita Dunn in his employ pretty much verify Obama's political alignment.
Obama didn't even spend his formative years in the U.S.; his teenage years (in Hawaii) were whiled away under the tutelage of Davis, who hated America and was a Communist Party operative in both in Chicago and Hawaii. Obama attended Harvard and allegedly Columbia, and ultimately moved to Chicago to learn how to "be black" and pursue Saul Alinsky's Marxist model of community organizing.
This, from his earliest days of social consciousness, had always been his objective.
Posts
