Treason: Obama's 'Gitmo Five' ~ By Matt Barber

Updated June 14, 2014

Merriam-Webster defines “treason” as, “the crime of trying to overthrow your country’s government or of helping your country’s enemies during war.”

Whether Obama is intentionally trying to overthrow his own government is open for debate. But that he has “helped his country’s enemies during war” is a slam dunk.

The amazing thing? This arrogant clown admits to it: “Is there a possibility of some of them trying to return to activities that are detrimental to us?” Obama asked rhetorically of the five terrorists he just cut loose. “Absolutely,” he answered.

Possibility? It’s a guarantee. There is no doubt that Americans will die as a direct result of Obama’s demonstrably illegal actions here – no doubt whatsoever. With most of these monsters in their 40s, they’ve got decades to kill as many Americans as they can get their blood-soaked hands on.

In this column, Matt Barber is saying that President Obama should be impeached.  As you will see in the video below, Judge Jeanine Pirro agrees with Matt wholeheartedly.


Please note:  To see the following video, you must be logged in to Facebook.

Post by Johnny2k's America.

Clearly, there are many that would like to see Barack Hussein Obama impeached.  However, there are major roadblocks to that effort. But, as Matt Barber says:

What will it take for our spineless U.S. Congress to overcome this deathly fear of being called “racist” and file articles of impeachment against Barack Hussein Obama?

For whatever reason, a label like "racist" seems to work. Obama is the Teflon President, but maybe not for that reason alone. There has to be another reason for allowing the insanity continue. There has to be something else, but far be it from me to speculate on what that would be. Just sayin'...

Treason: Obama's 'Gitmo Five'

Matt Barber

By Matt Barber

June 9, 2014 6:55 am

From GOPUSA.com

You were already thinking it.

Treason.

For Richard Nixon, it was a cover-up surrounding illegal wiretapping. For Bill Clinton, it was lying under oath about sex with an intern. Obama thinks he’s untouchable. He believes he’s above the law.

Evidently, he’s right.

What will it take for our spineless U.S. Congress to impeach this tyrant? This is way beyond partisan politics. This is about justice. This is about the safety of the American people. Barack Hussein Obama is America’s biggest threat to national security. He is “an enemy within.”

It’s official. America is no longer a constitutional republic. Under this “progressive” nut, we’ve become a banana republic.

~~~ READ MORE on GOPUSA.com ~~~

*    *    *    *

As an additional feature here on Blogging In Our Time 2 Escape, this blog will be including videos that have been posted on the johnny2k's America Facebook page! Videos can sometimes say more than what can be expressed in text.  Be sure to visit the archive with hundreds of videos to peruse!

Please note:  To see the johnny2k’s America videos on this blog, you must be logged in to Facebook.

*     *     *     *

Don't be afraid!

WE the PEOPLE

are the MOB
ONE NATION UNDER GOD

YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear

*     *     *     *

The boy who cried 'racist' ~ By Burt Prelutsky

Burt explains the one thing that the leftists do that is actually working (99.9% of their ideas NEVER work, but I digress), and it is as he writes, "One of the sneakiest, most despicable things left-wingers do is play racial politics, and when you call them on it, they get to brand you as racists." It seems so true, as we have learned. In fact, have you ever figured out why the Progressives like to call Tea Partiers, or for that matter, anyone that doesn't like President Obama, racist? It's kind of weird, isn't it? How many black people that didn't like George W. Bush were ever called racist? Just sayin'...

P.S. By the way, Burt, I love your new profile picture!

The unfortunate thing is that just as the Communists perverted the meaning of "comrade" and homosexuals perverted the meaning of "gay," the self-righteous leftists have perverted "racist." It no longer means a person who is racially intolerant, who would harm or subjugate another human being because of his skin color, but, instead, denotes someone who really is color-blind and who judges people solely on the basis of their character.

By Burt Prelutsky

Posted: May 21, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

By this time, I'm sure we've all seen those posters of George W. Bush captioned "Miss Me Yet?" I, personally, think things have gotten so bad in Obama's America that I wouldn't be surprised if we begin seeing those same posters springing up with Jimmy Carter's picture.

When I read that Sen. Dianne Feinstein had said, "I've gotten over 90,000 e-mails and faxes on the health-care bill and over 85,000 of them are against it. After all the debate we've had, I can't believe so many people still don't get it," I recall wondering if Obama's arrogance was a contagious disease for which there's no known antidote.

That reminds me that William F. Buckley, Jr., once observed that, "Liberals claim they want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." (emphasis my own)

He was also the conservative sage who once told a left-winger, "I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what you just said." Does a single day go by when most of us haven't wished to say those very words to Robert Gibbs? (emphasis my own)

One of the sneakiest, most despicable things left-wingers do is play racial politics, and when you call them on it, they get to brand you as racists. (emphasis my own)

For instance, affirmative action was created to give racial preferences to blacks to make amends for slavery and Jim Crow laws. But after nearly 50 years, try to suggest it's time to put racial quotas aside, and you will find yourself tarred as a racist.

For the past 30 years, Islamics around the world have targeted Americans, but suggest that they constitute a toxic menace and you're labeled a racist.

For the past quarter century, millions of Mexicans, who were not escaping political oppression, have felt entitled to stream across our border, to take advantage of our schools and hospitals, to fill our streets with drugs and flood our jails with criminals, and if we even complain about it, we're called racists.

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

Profits derived from your purchases
will help me to attend tea party rallies,
(especially the one in Las Vegas, on July 15-17)!

The Democrats' 'nuclear option' ~ By Henry Lamb

Thank God for Henry Lamb, because he has shown in this column something that probably few people would have known, or believed, just how hypocritical the Democrats are! The good thing is that we now have a written record of what Senate Democrats said five years ago about using the "nuclear option" when the Republicans had the majority in the United States Senate. Now look! Gee, those words spoken by then Senators Obama, Biden and Clinton, must not have been very sincere, apparently.

It seems to show the Democrats for what they really are. If they do use the "nuclear option" to pass health care reform, doesn't that say they could care less about what the Founders gave us in the Constitution, and that they honestly could care less about this country? Should anyone be at all surprised if the Republicans regain the majority in the Senate in 2010 or 2012?

The Marxist majority in Washington is determined to take control over health care. They want it all, now. If they can't get it all, they will take whatever they can get now, and come back and back and back again, until they get the entire economy under government control. This is the obvious goal of this administration and of the Democrat leadership. This end justifies any means for these people.


For the rest of the people, this means an end to the arrogance of Democratic power in November.

By Henry Lamb

Posted: March 06, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

A few years ago, the Democrats were in the minority in Washington. They took great delight in using the 60-vote filibuster rule to prevent President Bush's judicial nominations from ever coming to the floor for a vote. The Republicans threatened to change the rules so judicial nominations and presidential appointees could get approved or rejected with a simple majority vote. Democrats went absolutely ballistic. The threat was dubbed "The nuclear option."

Dianne Feinstein said:

If the nuclear option is successful, it will turn the Senate into a body that could have its rules broken at any time by a majority of senators unhappy with any position taken by the minority. It begins with judicial nominations. Next will be executive appointments. And then, legislation. (Senate chamber May 18, 2005)

Then-Sen. Obama said:

A change in the Senate rules would change the character of the Senate forever. And what I worry about would be that you would essentially still have two chambers in the House and the Senate, but you would have, simply, majoritarian absolute power on either side, and that's just not what the founders intended. (National Press Club, April 25, 2005)

It's a different story now that the Democrats are the majority party. Now, however, the issue is not simply whether judicial nominees and presidential appointments should require 51 or 60 votes. The issue now is bypassing the filibuster rule so that the health-care system – 17 percent of the entire economy – can be handed over to the government by a simple majority vote rather than the 60 votes required by the current filibuster rules.

Five years ago, Democrats believed that bypassing the filibuster would destroy the government.

Five years ago, Sen. Schumer believed:

We are on the precipice of a crisis, a constitutional crisis. The checks and balances which have been at the core of this republic are about to be evaporated by the nuclear option.

Then-Sen. Joe Biden said:

The nuclear option is ultimately an example of the arrogance of power. It is a fundamental power grab. I say to my friends on the Republican side: You may own the field right now, but you won't own it forever. And I pray God that when the Democrats take back control we don't make the kind of naked power grab you are doing. (Senate chamber, May 23, 2005)

What irony. If the Democrats proceed with their version of the nuclear option, it will be none other than Joe Biden who will make it happen. As president of the Senate, he is the only person who can overrule the parliamentarian who will have to recommend the removal of all policy matters from the bill. There's wisdom in the old adage "Be careful what you pray for."

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!