Look who's talking ~ By Patrick J. Buchanan

Pat Buchanan weighs in on the NAACP resolution that accuses the Tea Party Movement of being racist. As we all know, the Tea Party is not racist. However, because we don't like big government, open borders (and that we are siding with Arizona), the socialization of health care and our economy in general, and the way the oil spill has been handled, the other side (Progressives) - with the media's assistance - tries to make it sound like we don't like Obama because he is black. "None of these issues has anything directly to do with race," Pat writes. "Jealous and the NAACP are trying to change the subject from Obama's failure to Obama's race, and from the failures of liberals to the motivations of conservatives." 

Of course, as we all know, it is just part of the Saul Alinsky strategy ("Rules for Radicals") to discredit the Tea Party Movement by denigration.

As I like to do when possible, I've included a video that I put up on youtube last week, which is very telling of the double standard of the Tea Party Movement detractors, and the NAACP in particular.

NAACP accuses Tea Party Movement with Racism

Video provided by TheREALjohnny2k

I have news for the Tea Party detractors. It ain't working. And by the way, if the NAACP also had a resolution condemning the NBPP and King Samir Shabazz, why wasn't that reported by the news media? Was the story just buried in the news, or did the NAACP fail to tell anyone (until the segment above on Fox News)? Just sayin'...

By accusing the tea party of harboring racists, the NAACP is, in effect, demanding that the party appear in a court of public opinion to prove itself innocent of an unsupported slander.

Sorry, that's not how things work in America.

Folks here are innocent until proven guilty, and name-calling is the last recourse of exhausted minds, to which attention need not be paid. The NAACP has become what Graham Green called a "burnt-out case."

As longshoreman-philosopher Eric Hoffer observed, every great movement begins as a cause, eventually becomes a business, then degenerates into a racket. Time for the Ford Foundation to pull the plug on its subsidiary, whose time has come and gone a long time ago.

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted: July 16, 2010 ~ 1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

Rescuing itself from the obscurity it richly deserves, the NAACP has found a way back onto the front page: Accuse the tea-party movement of harboring racists.

At its Kansas City convention, NAACP President and CEO Ben Jealous declaimed: "Expel the bigots and racists in your ranks, or take the responsibility for them and their actions. We will no longer allow you to hide like cowards."

Is it not an absurd world we live in?

Here is an organization whose very name, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, pronounces its goal – advancement through affirmative action, quotas, contract set-asides based on race – accusing another organization of being motivated by race.

Jealous might revisit the Sermon on the Mount.

"Judge not that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged. ... Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"

If discrimination means favoring people or opposing people based on race, two questions arise. Is that not pretty much the job description of the NAACP? And when has the tea party advocated hirings, promotions or school admissions based on race?

In the South Carolina gubernatorial primary, the tea party backed a woman of Indian-American descent, Nikki Haley, who was raised a Sikh, over three white men with superior resumes.

In the GOP primary in South Carolina's 1st Congressional District, African-American Tim Scott, with tea-party backing, routed Strom Thurmond's son three to one.

In Florida, the tea party vaulted a Hispanic, Cuban-American Marco Rubio, into so strong a lead over favorite Gov. Charlie Crist in the race for the U.S. Senate that Crist quit the GOP.

And the NAACP?

In the year 2000, the organization ran an ad using the daughter of James Byrd, the victim of a dragging death by white racists, to imply Gov. George W. Bush's opposition to a hate-crimes bill meant that Bush was indifferent to the lynching of James Byrd.

This was as nasty a piece of political advertising as has been run in our time. When or where has the tea party run such a despicable ad?

In the last month, the major story with a racial dimension has been the charge that Eric Holder's Justice Department dropped an open-and-shut case against members of the New Black Panther Party of Philadelphia, two of whom were caught on tape threatening and intimidating white voters in the November 2008 election.

Justice's J. Christian Adams, who resigned to protest dropping the Panther case, testified before the Civil Rights Commission that attorneys in the Civil Rights Division of Justice were told to ignore cases involving black defendants and white victims.

A tape has now turned up where New Black Panther Minister King Samir Shabazz, one of the two charged with voter intimidation, rants before a small crowd: "You want freedom. You're gonna have to kill some crackers. You're gonna have to kill some of their babies."

Perhaps we can hear from the NAACP on the New Black Panther Party in Philadelphia. Perhaps we can hear more from the NAACP on the ugliest form of racism in America, interracial violent crime – which, according to FBI statistics, is largely black-on-white, not the reverse.

Remarkable. In the black community, the jobless rate is 15 percent, the dropout rate is sometimes 50 percent, the illegitimacy rate is over 70 percent, nearly a million black Americans are in jail, prison or juvenile detention – and the NAACP is passing resolutions denouncing some guys carrying signs portraying Obama as The Joker.

READ FULL STORY at WorldNetDaily.com

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!

The dismissal of the Philadelphia Black Panther Voter Intimidation case

Despite an abundance of evidence of voter intimidation in Philadelphia, PA. on November 4, 2008, the Dept. of Justice decided to dismiss the cases. J. Christian Adams and Bartle Bull are interviewed by Megyn Kelly on Fox News Channel about the cases in the videos below.

Assuming the two gentlemen are accurately explaining all that occurred within the Department of Justice regarding the case, I feel that there should be an independent investigation of the DOJ, to find out who actually gave the orders to Steve Rosenbaum and Loretta King to get the case dismissed. Was it for political favors?

Or... is there something deeply and insidiously sinister going on that is even more widespread than just the Philadelphia case? Is this what voters should expect to happen at the polls this November? Just don't forget what you will hear in the 4th video with Bartle Bull (at 2:00): "Now you will see what it's means to be ruled by the black man, cracker."  Just sayin'...

DOJ Lawyer J. Christian Adams who quit over Black Panther Voter Intimidation case (3 Parts)

Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case. PART 1

On November 4, 2008 in Philadelphia, PA, 2 Black Panthers, one armed with a baton were harassing white voters who attempted to go into the polling station. The Panthers stationed themselves in front of the doors and shouted racial slurs at the white voters and were physically intimidating. The threat of violence was implied.
J. Christian Adams was an attorney working on the case and received a Default Judgment when the defendants did not show up to court or file any papers. They "blew it off." On May 15th, he was ordered to dismiss the case against Jerry Jackson, the tall Panther.

Incidentally, Mr. Jackson is also a Democratic Elected official from Philadelphia. The dismissal orders came from Steve Rosenbaum and Loretta King, both political appointees working in the Obama Administration, citing "the facts in the law don't support going forward with the case." This, despite the fact there were witnesses as well as plaintiffs who testified. The other defendant, wielding the baton got a "temporary injunction stopping him from appearing at the polls with a weapon, but only for a few years," essentially a "timid restraint."

J. Christian Adams said "there is pervasive hostility within the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department" regarding victims of racial discrimination, when the victims are white. Because of this failure of the Obama Administration to fulfill it's candidacy promise of transparency and openness, and the flagrant disregard for the Law, Mr. Adams resigned his position in protest.

Video provided by fab4bear

Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case. PART 2

(See description above)

Video provided by fab4bear

Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case. PART 3

(See description above)

Video provided by fab4bear

Bartle Bull reacts to former DOJ attorney on Black Panther case "Obama is a hustler"

Bartle Bull accuses the Obama Administration of corruption in handling the Philadelphia Black Panthers charges of Voter Intimidation in the November 2008 case that was dismissed by Steve Rosenbaum and Loretta King, both political appointees working in the Obama Administration. A lifelong Democrat, and having worked in the Carter Administration, he says he supported McCain because he believes Obama is a "hustler."

Video provided by fab4bear

Be sure to check out
johnny2k's Tea Party Gear!